RE: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

The video can be found at the following link: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/06/announcement-demonstration-of-steorns-n ever-die-orbo-power-cube-battery-in-dublin-pub-starting-friday/ or http://tinyurl.com/oqkfp3x Just scroll down a couple of screen fulls. Regards, Steven

[Vo]:SEP 11 LENR NEWS

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/09/sep-11-2015-lenr-news.html Rossi says, Axil says Very interesting things will come in the next 3 days. (or not!) Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:5-Million-Degree Plasma 'Tornado' Rages on the Sun (Video)

Latest from the Solar Dynamics Observatory: http://www.space.com/30498-solar-tornado-nasa-sdo-video.html That's one helluva dust-devil! -mark

[Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

Some of this info is almost a month old, but still... First I've ever heard about it. It would appear STEORN may soon be getting ready to market a cordless charger for your cellphone. Gets its energy from... who knows. http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News=article=3650

Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > One gets the impression the device is pretty close to being ready to be > boxed and sold commercially to the public. > That is my impression from the announcement. I doubt this device is real, and I doubt we will ever hear of

Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section

Why the strong force behaves this way - repulsion at close distance, and then switching to strong attraction with very short fall-off - is a core mystery of quantum mechanics and nuclear theory. That having been said, Don Hotson's analysis of the Dirac's equation as a TOE (theory of everything)

RE: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson Ø It would appear STEORN may soon be getting ready to market a cordless charger for your cellphone. Gets its energy from... who knows. Given the lack of technical acumen at Steorn, and given that are showing a commercial product (at a Pub, of

Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > I find Hotson's analysis of what Dirac's equation implies to be very > compelling. It really throws conventional quantum mechanics back on its > heels! I have his papers, but there have been links to them several

Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

Not sure, but this is the latest T-shirt design, from CEO Shaun McCarthy's Facebook profile: https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtf1/v/t1.0-9/11896090_10153129810703977_2701005192849534586_n.jpg?oh=98d0448fa86fc22274063d089c6d744f=56A41575 On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Orionworks

Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section

If we have something that quantum mechanically entangles two dissimilar atoms, then these two atoms become the same combined atom at the same location in space. Will their nuclei combine in a fusion reaction? https://www.sciencenews.org/article/everyday-entanglement In the Lugano test, it looks

RE: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

Jones, always presenting the Vort Collective with the perception of the quintessential cynic spiced with a well-researched conspiratorial slant! And Jed, countering much of that spice with a more practical no-nonsense POV. Both POVs, I find valuable. Agreed, the probability that this latest

[Vo]:David French's analysis of Rossi patent

See: http://coldfusionnow.org/analysis-of-rossi-us-patent-9115913-issued-25aug15-part-1/

Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section

Does anyone know why this interaction varies as the sixth power of separation? The electric field varies as the second power of distance if single charges are present, such as the repulsion between two electrons. I believe this is assumed to be true due to the electric flux expanding into

Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:15:44 -0700: Hi, [snip] >To confuse matters, the supercapacitor (sometimes called ultracapacitor) is >electrochemical like the battery but with extreme capacitance at low voltage >(~1.2 v) dictated by chemistry. These bridge the gap

Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

It's probably explained here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3JogbHX8yo

Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:15:44 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Plus – we should remember that capacitors technically do not “store >charge” Instead, charge is segregated and transported via the external >circuit as EMF and stored as energy in the electric field between

RE: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

From: Frank Acland … this is the latest T-shirt design, from CEO Shaun McCarthy's Facebook profile: “The battery is dead” Which is News to a genuine entrepreneur like Elon Musk. Yet, it is true that semantics is blurring the distinction between battery and capacitor, or between those two

Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:47 AM, David Roberson wrote: Does anyone know why this interaction varies as the sixth power of > separation? Just to clarify -- the nuclear force is the one that drops off with the sixth power (per Robin). The speculative relationship between the

Re: [Vo]:time, separation and neutron tunneling cross section

But why does the force fall off with such a high power relationship with respect to separation? If there are more than 3 spatial dimensions then some of the acting flux might leak off into those mystery regions. Otherwise, I am having a difficult time visualizing why it is not limited in a