I plan to duplicate the 1998 Focardi Ni-H cell as per
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSlargeexces.pdf except for the
water jacket and confirm or not his reported results.
I have a really nicely fitted out workshop with toys like lathes, mills,
pulse welders, medium and high vacuum
Yes I have read that. But first I plan to try to duplicate the 1998
Focardi cell as closely as I can. I have emailed Focardi and asked for
the dimensions of the cell and construction material and informed him I
plan to replicate. I'm just a power system engineer and not a
physicists, so I do
I have read Focardi did heat treat the Ni rod, which I also intend to
do. I also understand there can be problems with the Ni rod becoming H
loaded and producing heat when there is no external heating applied. I
do note Focardi does show a vacuum supply that can be applied to the
cell and with
Focardi has disclosed some data on how the Ni rods were prepared which
seems doable:
In order to compare samples having the same surface but different
bulks, the metal
rods used in the experiments described here (stainless steel for cell A
and nickel for cell
B) were coated with a thick (
Thanks for the link and references. I can see I have a lot of reading to
do. I it seems my replication efforts are for a Piantelli cell
(according to his patent application) and not a Focardi cell?
I should be able to borrow the high vacuum and other pumps needed. My
patent attorney, who is
Overall I do agree with you, especially as cell A was a Ni plated
stainless rod and it produces more power than did the Ni plated Ni rod.
However I do plan to replicate the original Piantelly / Focardi cell
design as closely as I can and how they produced, processed and H loaded
the Ni rods.
This is very interesting. Thanks for sharing. Will soon be able to share
our data as well. I also note mention of better results with
electropolished Ni. Any comments on that?
On 11/8/2011 6:11 PM, kulintsov wrote:
Sorry, industrial secret, ZOG's pursuit, no comments.
By the way during my
Nice list you put together Peter. We will try to get all the papers and
have them translated. It should not take too long for a patent attorney
to obtain those papers or do have a source of them translated? If so
care to share? You see, I don't like re-inventing the wheel and those
papers
Yes, thanks to you Peter, I do now understand the Ni-H cell design is
Piantelli. Before I start changing anything, I will attempt to replicate
his design as described in the Focardi and Piantelli paper in 1998 and
in the Piantelli patent. I'm an old and cautious engineer, who has
learned not
Dr. Focardi talking in Italian on TED.
http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/TEDxBologna-Sergio-Focardi-LE-c There is
a nice shot of a early prototype E-Cat reactor sitting in a red plastic
bucket, during his presentation plus a few more, which gives me a lot of
hope to replicate a Piantelli LENR
I do like the idea of the Ni tube and putting the heater element inside
for all the reasons you listed. This could result in a very simple to
make cell as thermal heat, H2 and vacuum only needs to be applied to the
inside of the tube. Using a stainless tube with Ni electroplated and
I'm on my 2nd read of the Piantelli patent application WO 2010/058288
Al. I'm starting to understand the nuclear process he is describing. Is
this for real? To me it seems logical and simple to understand but then
I'm not a physicists. Has this nuclear fusion like exchange of
Piantelli's been
As I soon (4 to 8 weeks) will hopefully be doing my own calorimeter
measurements, Robert will you please assist my learning curve by
pointing how the 6 Oct E-Cat thermocouple input and output heat
exchanger measuring points were incorrect and how they should have been
done properly so I don't
These is a very descriptive write of of the Piantelli process in the
patent application I referenced. Link here:
http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2010058288recNum=1docAn=IB2009007549queryString=ALLNAMES:%28piantelli%29maxRec=1
Is this the latest?
AG
On 11/9/2011
Thank you Axil, that is my understanding as well and explained much
better than I could. I have been told that Piantelli has confirmed each
step is correct.
AG
On 11/9/2011 3:52 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
**
*Hydrogen Ions are protons and are positively charged.*
**
**
*The Piantelli theory
Some more inside shots
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3295952.ece/BINARY/w468/kall_fusion_rossi_sprattad_lada_1_468_320.jpg
that can be done to reduce cost and improve performance,
which is exactly what a engineering in a hurry would have built.
AG
On 11/9/2011 12:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Some more inside shots
http
I have spent some time on working out what is what in the Exposed E-Cat
photos.
What can be seen is boiler scale on the reactor heat radiation fins,
external conduits and assembly bolts which seems to indicate water and
steam occur in the outer box as the Higgins drawing suggests and not
Guy E-Cat wrote:
I have spent some time on working out what is what in the Exposed
E-Cat photos.
What can be seen is boiler scale on the reactor heat radiation fins,
external conduits and assembly bolts which seems to indicate water
and steam occur in the outer box as the Higgins drawing
Krivit produced no references for his statements. And you would believe
him why? Especially which his very public anti Rossi stance, which I
believe is not justified by anything Krivit had or has not published.
Just by 2 pence worth. Maybe time to pass the buttered popcorn?
I'm pro Rossi's
I will read your information. I do apologize for assuming you were a
LENR denier. But mate, values in the inside box to do a fraud? Maybe a
bit much.
AG
On 11/9/2011 7:21 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Mate I'm not a physicists
Rossi has said that each of the 107 E-Cat reactor boxes in the 1 MW demo
had a individual control system. Running in self sustain mode, with the
heater not being activated, the only other wires going into the reactor
box are those called RF as per the attachment. One would then assume
these
. I suggest that you look over a the
detailed, smooth graph of T2 versus Time using all of the data
points. If you do, you will see a treasure trove of data to mine.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 9
I might suggest that the 2 RF wires maybe multicore shielded cable. If
it was just 2 wires, why would Rossi need 2 penetration in the outer and
inner box? Way too many holes to seal against leaks. One cable may be
input and the other output, which are separated into 2 cables to reduce
cross
Seems someone did manage to click a few photos anyway.
AG
On 11/10/2011 9:38 AM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
2011/11/10 Horace Heffnerhheff...@mtaonline.net:
(it was not mine
impression, but my impression is based on indirect conclusion made
that I do not remember anyone saying seen such a large
What if the patent theory is wrong and Piantelli or W-L is right? Would
he then be left with no protection other than trade secrets?
I do note he is seeking non disclosed uni research help as he tries to
get them to help him understand how his reactor really works. I don't
envy Rossi, knowing
I have been thinking about what should be inside the inner box as the
heat transfer from the reactor core to the fluid is no longer done
inside the door knob like reactor.
Rossi says there are 3 cores inside each module and that is all he says.
I would suggest he may have encased all the
ran for such a long time.
It has been apparent that Rossi has made a serious effort to disguise
the real data by his actions. I suspect he wants to keep doubt alive
so that the 'war' does not start until the last moment.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e
not start until the last moment.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 11:41 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Inside the inner box
I have been thinking about what should be inside the inner box as the
heat transfer
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
Comes up account suspended. WTF?
rossilivecat.com
http://rossilivecat.com is also
non-functional.
Peter
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
Comes up account suspended. WTF
Ok a good call. No micros inside. When Rossi's tech was getting ready to
open the module, he wipes away a lot of white powder that was sitting on
top of the top metal plate. Do you think the powder might have been
powered Boric Acid placed all around the E-Cat as a neutron shield?
AG
On
The white powder was between what looks like 2 sheets of lead directly
on the top of the top pate of the reactor box. Start watching from 11:00
minutes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-5cFOsisAofeature=player_embedded#!
AG
On 11/10/2011 6:57 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
I cannot say
/10/2011 11:52 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-11-10 03:15 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Ok a good call. No micros inside. When Rossi's tech was getting ready
to open the module, he wipes away a lot of white powder that was
sitting on top of the top metal plate. Do you think the powder might
These guys (NI) know what they are doing. No BS with them. It works, it
works right and it works all the time. Brilliant move.
AG
On 11/11/2011 12:04 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Bravo!
I hope it is true.
This is exactly the right thing to do. You have to hand it to Rossi.
He has good
Simple to fix. Just paint a big E-CAT logo on the side of the container
and on each module. ;)
AG
On 11/11/2011 5:56 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
http://www.ni.com/legal/trademarks/
Rules for usage, excerpt:
# Do not display any NI Trademark more prominently than your own trademarks,
Rossi has stated each E-Cat module has it own control system. There are
2 wires / cables connected to each module in addition to a earth wire
plus the 2 heater power wires. I doubt the 2 non heater power wires are
there for show. Additionally it has been disclosed that Rossi and NI
have been
http://www.leonardo-ecat.com
I find this very interesting. Where is there a scam here?
http://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/Products/1MW_Plant/index.html
*Purchase Terms*
* Price: 2,000 Euros per kilowatt.
* 1 MW plant. Only under approved circumstances will smaller sizes be
considered, but no less than 100 kW.
* Full
Site says 100 kw min.
Rossi gets nothing until the unit meets specifications.
AG
On 11/12/2011 10:23 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I find this very interesting. Where
The money goes into a escrow account. You understand what that means?
AG
On 11/12/2011 10:34 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Site says 100 kw min.
Rossi gets nothing until
.
AG
On 11/12/2011 10:34 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Site says 100 kw min.
Rossi gets nothing until the unit meets specifications.
Right. Steorn said something like that too
Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does
the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to
create the web site or who the web site was created by or who it is
administered by?
I suggest the sales and payment conditions has just totally taken
the station and is gathering speed.
Next announcement is?
AG
On 11/12/2011 11:36 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi but what the heck does
the validity of the E-Cat have to do with the software that was used to
create the web site or who the web site
Nothing wrong with old programmers and old engineers. Cut by first code
on a 8008 system that I designed and built. Had a whole 256 bytes of
ram. Put the program in with switches. Now that is old code.
AG
On 11/12/2011 11:56 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com
. Rossi's payment conditions and his selected customer base has seen
to that.
AG
On 11/12/2011 12:25 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice to see the web site is registered to Rossi
You mean this:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=svsl=svtl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oru.se%2FKalendarium%2FStartsida-Kalendarium%2Foffentliga-forelasningar%2FOffentliga-forelasningar-Morgondagens-karnkraft---blir-den-kall-eller-varm-%2F
Should be interesting but I expect more news to surface
For us Aussies, yesterday was Remembrance Day:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_Day
Whole country stopped for 1 minute to remember fallen mates. :(
AG
On 11/12/2011 12:39 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
... Today has been declared National Corduroy Day since 11/11/11/
looks so much like
Please tell me how Rossi can scam a engineering firm E-Cat sales
customer with his payment terms? He can't. Everything else you say has
no real meaning or value. Rossi knows the meat in the sandwich is the
meeting the claimed COP 6 performance. No one really cares who is or who
is not on the
that you can not
hide behind a internet alias. The courts do have the ability to peal
back the internet layers and find out who you really are.
AG
On 11/12/2011 1:06 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e
You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop making up
statement that you may wish to be real.
BTW to engineers, he has proved the E-Cat works and that is all he needs
to do. Why? Because his customers are engineering firms who do know how
to measure the heat the E-Cat
On 11/12/2011 2:08 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
You claimed Rossi may have scammed investors. Prove it or stop
making up statement that you may wish to be real.
You're making stuff
, because you are creating a
strawman for Rossi. Thus, you are helping with the mess around here.
2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Mary you just do not get it do you? You can't go around saying you
think Rossi may have scammed investors
.
2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Ka? I never said Rossi was looking for investors or had any. From
what I have read he doesn't need them and has self funded this
project.
AG
On 11/12/2011 2:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote
cannot say that is defamatory if there is no investors.
2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
I cautioned that making statements of scamming investors, when
those statement can not be proven, is defamation. My statements in
no way give
reputation with something it doesn't exist.
2011/11/12 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Defamation is the act of making a false statements with the intent
to cause loss of reputation plus a few more. Suggesting to someone
that the statement they just
http://www.leonardo-ecat.com/fp/News/Upcoming/index.html
Next Few Months
* New customers of the one megawatt E-Cat plant reveal their identity
publicly.
* Location of first E-Cat factory in the United States revealed.
The web site belongs to Leonardo Corp. It matters not who wrote the
words as long as they are the words of the web site owner. You again
attempt to cast into doubt credibility of Rossi and statements made on
the Leonardo web site by involving the credibility of an unknown writer.
Mary you do
Here we agree Mary. Both Sterling and Rossi must wear the cost of this
stuff-up.
AG
On 11/13/2011 2:59 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Latest Rossi-ism:
*
Andrea Rossi
November 12th, 2011 at 8:57 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-117146
WARNING: THE
Like everything I build it was a work in progress and was continually
evolving. The switch panel went when I got an old teletype. Was so
excited that I had a printer and real keyboard. The system code was then
about 1 k. The last work I did on that system involved designing in a
video terminal
It matters not who the web site administrator is or who typed the text
on the pages. The web site is owned by Leonardo Corp, it is their
official web site and any pages there are approved and binding on that
corporation.
So stop with the Sterling references. It does not matter and has no
While considering the fabrication of my Ni-H cell, several points
concerning the Door Knob Rossi LENR reactor have come to light.
1) Rossi used a wrap around external heater to bring the core up to
operational temperature.
2) This external heater could not be the source of the necessary
I believe Rossi or someone said the genset was rated at 300 kva and they
had a spare on site, in case the prime genset failed.
AG
On 11/13/2011 4:44 PM, Berke Durak wrote:
After watching the available footage and looking at the pictures of
the Oct. 28th demo, I have
just drawn a diagram of
That is interesting as I'm sure I read / heard they were both 300 kva
gensets. There should be power and control cables going into the E-Cat
container.
AG
On 11/13/2011 4:55 PM, Berke Durak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe
120,000 TWs reaches the surface of the planet according to:
http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/reports/files/SEU_rpt.pdf
The solar availability at the top of the atmosphere is 170,000 TW, of
which 120,000 TW strikes the Earth (the
remainder being scattered by the atmosphere and clouds).
AG
On
It is not a good state of affairs. I did advise Rossi, via his blog to
take the site off line, which he said he was doing. I can't see how
Sterling can claim this is a work in progress E-Cat web site that is not
authorized by Rossi. As had been pointed out, the URL is owned by Rossi.
AG
On
It just got worst:
http://pesn.com/2011/11/15/9601957_Sterling_Allan_on_the_up_and_down_of_Rossis_approval_of_Leonardo-ECat.com/
The web site is registered to Rossi. Sterling can't just take it over. I
did email Rossi that he should insist the web site be take down it if
was not there with his
I would really like to see what the screen on top of the PLC was
displaying. All the answers to our engineering control questions could
be on that screen. It sure looks like the box was very full of controls
of various types and kinds.
AG
On 11/17/2011 2:30 AM, Rich Murray wrote:
Nice to
Downloaded the document ok. All there.
AG
On 11/20/2011 1:57 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Good news : I found the link.Legacy Image - Scan to PDF
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710004292_1971004292.pdf
Bad news ... the file's corrupted, and only shows about a quarter
It is 11.8 MBs. Sending in the next email.
AG
On 11/20/2011 2:10 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Weird ... can you search for surface tension/drops
(It's probably to big to email ... but could you give it a try. This address)
- Original Message -
Downloaded the document ok. All there.
Sent. Shall I also send to your direct email?
AG
On 11/20/2011 2:10 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Weird ... can you search for surface tension/drops
(It's probably to big to email ... but could you give it a try. This address)
- Original Message -
Downloaded the document ok. All
Send to Vortex failed. Sending directly to your email.
AG
On 11/20/2011 2:10 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Weird ... can you search for surface tension/drops
(It's probably to big to email ... but could you give it a try. This address)
- Original Message -
Downloaded the document
On 11/20/2011 2:30 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
What Rossi could do would be twofold. First, ally himself with some
deep pockets.
Deep pockets? How much deeper can you get but the military? Who Rossi
now claims bought the first and the next 13 x 1 MW E-Cat plants. I doubt
the military would wish to
Thanks for that tip. It is done:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B__Wi_DF2CjJM2Y2Mjc4YTQtNjliNC00OGMxLWI5NTAtNWY0NzUyNWU1MTQ5
AG
On 11/20/2011 2:37 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Send to Vortex failed. Sending
Mary, I have a nice infinite COP device in my pocket to show you. I
produces electricity from no known energy source. That is as long as you
forget about the discovery of the photovoltaic effect in 1839. Ok, I
agree that in 2011 the device will not meet your requirements. BUT in
1838 it would
hand reports, peoples names, history of other tests,
etc. With you all we have is an internet alias and your straw man claims.
AG
On 11/20/2011 3:06 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote
to be anywhere near that cell if it really ran away. 123 kWs is a
LOT of heat. Happy to discuss your ideas and needs.
AG
On 11/20/2011 3:14 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Are you interested in building an ecat? You could help me.
2011/11/20 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e
, is there more than one Mary Yugo straw man on the net?),
instead of putting your money where you mouth is and engaging the
process of ordering a thermal plant from Rossi.
AG
On 11/20/2011 3:34 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
I have just emailed Rossi with my interest in purchasing a 100 kW E-Cat
plant. I do thank Vortex members (on the forum and privately) for
providing the behind the scenes insight into the history of LENR that
helped to make this decision happen. My bags are ready to be packed,
funds locked down
I doubt that would work as the control E-Cat may have been preloaded
with H2, either in the processing of the powder or in the initial
operational testing. I will ask if this is possible.
AG
On 11/20/2011 5:48 PM, noone noone wrote:
Hello,
Congrats on being able to test an E-Cat.
I would
I intend to use a digital flow rate monitor, inserted into the intake
water hose. The data logger will record 16 input and output data points
every 100 ms or finer if necessary. Amazing what GB memories can do.
Thanks for the lower flow rate and use of a bucket / basin for secondary
checking
Well I do hope he will sell a 100 kW plant to me.
AG
On 11/20/2011 5:39 PM, Charles Hope wrote:
Rossi said he'd sell to anybody except the military.
On Nov 19, 2011, at 23:17, Aussie Guy E-Cataussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/20/2011 2:30 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
What Rossi could do
I have always been a Black Box kind of guy and approached problem
solving in a binary divide and conquer approach. That way you make
little assumptions and just go with what the test data shows as the
incorrect or correct pathway.
I fully expect to sign a NDA and to put money into an Escrow
Amazing statements. Again with no basis in fact. Just more straw man
totally negative spin stuff. I've been a power system engineer for
probably longer than you have been alive. I do know how to construct a
test of the E-Cat. I have also been used by several patent attorneys and
investor
I'm happy to replicate the 6 Oct 2011 test setup. In fact I'll insist on
it as then I know what to expect. I'll bring temp, water flow and power
input monitoring equipment, plus the digital cro and the data logger.
I'm not initially interested in self sustain mode but will insist on at
least
Sounds like a war for LENR customers has started and in any war truth is
the first causality. Nothing like competition to quickly bring LENR
devices to the boil, so to speak. Wonder when the Piantelli Group, the
Americans and the Japanese will jump into the LENR pot? I bet not long.
I like the
to Defkalion.
This could be a good match with a diathermic oil based LENR heat
generator:
http://www.ge-energy.com/products_and_services/services/oil_and_gas_services/oregen.jsp
AG
On 11/20/2011 10:26 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 20.11.2011 09:47, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
Amazing statements
More here:
http://radio.rcdc.it/wp-content/uploads/Focardi-english-version.pdf
AG
On 11/20/2011 10:48 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
In this TEDx event:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=eGmgTo2Kw1U#t=564s
Focardi says, that no neutrons where observed.
Gamma radiation /not
on this so far. That would probably only pay for a good
piss-up for the hot fusion guys and a new coat of paint.
AG
On 11/21/2011 1:24 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 20.11.2011 15:23, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
More here:
http://radio.rcdc.it/wp-content/uploads/Focardi-english-version.pdf
Thank you. I
have to reassess their risk. I do agree
with the Hydrogen association. Maybe a middle path is to use metal
hydride storage?
AG
On 11/21/2011 1:59 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 20.11.2011 15:23, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
More here:
http://radio.rcdc.it/wp-content/uploads/Focardi-english
Other papers I have read mentioned non natural Cu isotope ratios.
However you suggestion may be a valid pathway, unless the H2 line is
filtered against such fine metal dust.
AG
On 11/21/2011 2:25 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 20.11.2011 16:43, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
You did read Focardi's
To me this statement made by Professor Levi about the 18 hour test he
and Rossi did is scary:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece
“/*Minimum power was 15 kilowatts, and that’s a conservative value. I
calculated it several times. At night we did a measurement
stream, inside the water hoses but not
touching the inside wall of the water hose.
AG
On 11/21/2011 2:48 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm happy to replicate the 6 Oct 2011 test
COP 6 powered mode. The first test I will request is of a single E-Cat
module and then when the 100 kW plant is ready to roll out, return to do
another test. I expect to learn a lot in the first test and will be
better able to tailor the 100 kW test protocol. We are on the same page
with the
/21/2011 3:06 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-11-20 08:08, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
I have just emailed Rossi with my interest in purchasing a 100 kW E-Cat
plant. [...]
Just to be clearer: have you only asked Rossi that you're interested
in purchasing an E-Cat plant, or has he already replied
It says they had $15 million ready but Rossi did not complete the
contract. That means they never paid Rossi the money and now they seem
to be claiming the technology is all theirs.
- *So the rift between you was not due only to non-payment of first
installment repayment, said Mr. Rossi?*
but it is my $200k and I don't like losing money buying a crappy product.
AG
On 11/21/2011 3:41 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
As I stated, I have sent an introductory and request to purchase
I appreciate your advise and one thing an old engineer learns is to
never reinvent the wheel. I have learned to leverage other peoples
experience and knowledge. If I get to the first test of a single E-Cat
module and Rossi doesn't throw a hissy fit, you are invited but your
costs are yours.
As the purchaser, he who has the Gold, (always remember the Golden Rule,
He who has the Gold makes the Rules) we will issue the purchase order,
with our acceptance test, performance, delivery, warranty / guarantee
and other conditions such as any disputes will be heard in an Australian
court.
24 hours of COP 6 powered mode operation from a single E-Cat reactor,
driving steam into a heat exchanger with 1 second data logging is fine
by me. One engineer in Nasa may not agree but that is his opinion and
not mine. I'm more concerned about shutting down a runaway reactor as
Murphy and I
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
