Check out the video linked on the following page. It's awesome!
What do all of you think?
Hitler Panics Over Rossi's Energy Catalyzer
A parody compiled by Hank Mills has Hitler bemoaning: If cold fusion
technology
hits the market place the oil industry will lose BILLIONS of dollars in
Hello Everyone,
On the following page a person details how Rossi stated he would publish their
paper, but then did not do so. The person theorizes that the paper might have
not been published due to the fact he mentions CARBON as a possible catalyst.
I find nothing strange about this report.
So what if he sold the building. He kept the reactor, and has produced hundreds
more since then. Defkalion has proceeded to build hundreds more. Defkalion has
actually built their own units, tested them, and they work great.
What I find strange is that
That is obvious in my opinion. He pushes his Widom Larsen theory on everyone,
and anyone who dares oppose it he attacks. It is obvious he has a vested
interest in proving Widom Larsen theory. I think since Rossi denied his
technology has anything to do with with Widom Larsen theory, Krivit
It is an outright lie.
Krivit is doing everything he can to attack Rossi.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement
Alan J Fletcher
Do you have something to back this up, or are you just trolling again?
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 3:27 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi and Defkalion Split-up?
Hold the presses.
Full Story at 5.
There are rumors that Rossi and Defkalion have split up. However, no evidence
has been presented.
If you have evidence, present it.
Otherwise, this is just rumor mongering.
- Forwarded Message -
From: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2011 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Defkalion Split Up RUMORMONGERING - You got
evidence, post it!
It is obvious Defkalion knows about the catalyst
a big disclaimer on it when you post it, so people will know that it
has not been confirmed as being legit.
From: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2011 1:38 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi
What if the opposite is true?
What if Defkalion had advanced the technology beyond what Rossi had been able
to achieve, and they really did not need Rossi any longer.
Remember, Defkalion claimed that the Greek govt were going to do performance
and safety certification testing of their products
I think it is obvious they have the catalyst.
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2011 10:41 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Defkalion doesn't need Rossi's catalyzer
Dear all,
I haven't seen any announcement from
What do you think the catalyst is at this time?
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Another Defkalion statement on PESN
Ever since one of our number “noone noone” posted
The thing is Widom Larsen theory (which I do not think is valid) does produce
nuclear fusion.
When a proton and electron pretending to be a neutron enter an atom's nucleus
releasing energy and causing transmutations, it is FUSION!!!
The Widom Larsen folks are absolutely out of their minds
Krivit and other worshippers of Widom Larsen theory do not make any sense. The
reaction is not a weak interaction, but a fusion reaction. The neutrons are
supposed to be protons and electrons that become virtual neutrons.
Basically, Widom Larsen worshippers want people to believe if a proton
Inspired by Krivit's nonsense.
Krivit has been out to try and discredit Rossi for a long time. He truly is a
snake.
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: [Vo]:PhysOrg reports on
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
pca pierre.carbonne...@gmail.com wrote:
Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
I wrote:
It's much better for Rossi to have licencee(s) build a few large
electricity-generating units in
Jed,
I emailed you. Please respond.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011 8:17:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a longer duration black box test would prove issue without
disclosure
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I don't think there is any RF generator.
My understanding of how the process works is this
First, the nano sized powder is cleaned of impurities by being baked and
perhaps
exposed to chemicals.
Second, the nano sized powder is bathed in chemicals and baked repeatedly. This
makes it able
I found this comment.
Dear Pierre,
Thank you for your important questions, here are the answers:
1- the Ni powder I utilized were pure Ni, no copper . At the end of the
operations in the reactor the percentage of copper was integrally bound to the
amount of energy produced. A charge which has
He admits on his website that they have not tried components from other
suppliers.
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, January 20, 2011 10:37:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Krivit relents
On 01/20/2011 09:57 AM,
Then why does BLP not produce a product?
They seem to have had a rock solid easily to replicate technology for a decade.
From: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, January 20, 2011 10:30:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Deuterium kills
states for absorb abd desorb are different?
From: francis froarty...@comcast.net
To: thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, January 20, 2011 7:28:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction?
Hi noone
noone said on Thu, 20
before
becoming a very important source of energy. My best friend Mike Carrell who has
also worked for long years -electrotechnics, advent of elctronics also sees
Randy's technology as The Solution
Peter
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Then why does BLP
Hello Everyone,
I am not a scientist. But I have been following alternative energy for a while.
For the past week I have been digging for hours trying to find additional
information about Rossi's technology and comparing it to BLP's effect. I have
came to the conclusion from what we know right
It is in the same forum.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=62
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 1:03:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Removing All Doubt
After some digging I think I got close to the
Do you have Skype, MSN, Yahoo, etc? Would you like to chat?
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, January 21, 2011 1:51:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Removing All Doubt
On 01/21/2011 01:43 PM, noone noone wrote
He does not use protium. He uses ordinary hydrogen. In the cell some of it is
broken down into atomic hydrogen. That is what interacts with the nickel.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=62cpage=2#comment-273
I said ‘eventually’ because it is exactly what happens. Of course you know
(READ HIS BLOG)
On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:06 AM, noone noone wrote:
He does not use protium. He uses ordinary hydrogen. In the cell some of it is
broken down into atomic hydrogen. That is what interacts with the nickel.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=62cpage=2#comment-273
I said
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 6:55:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Removing All Doubt (READ HIS BLOG)
On Jan 22, 2011, at 2:06 AM, noone noone wrote:
He does not use protium. He uses ordinary hydrogen. In the cell some of it is
broken down into atomic hydrogen. That is what interacts
Dear Mr Brian Robertson:
I again want to return on your comment, because it is very important, and I
forgot to say a thing that I deem important too.
The same Professors of the University of Bologna who made the test of the 14th
of January, had made a preliminar test, closed doors, on the
: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 9:09:28 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Monday Update to Release Information on Self Sustain Mode
Dear Mr Brian Robertson:
I again want to return on your comment, because it is very important, and I
forgot to say a thing
on Self Sustain Mode
Please indicate when you are quoting and when you are writing original
material. The style you have been using indicates that all that you post is
original material, which is false.
On 01/22/2011 09:09 AM, noone noone wrote:
Dear Mr Brian Robertson:
I again want to return
I think it is a very good development.
It is even more evidence that the reaction is real and robust.
Safety is NOT the big issue here. The biggest issue is if this works.
If the NRC has a problem with this technology I think that Rossi should just go
to African nations, China, or India and
On the contrary, some of Rossi's messages indicate that safety is a big issue,
and it is not assured.
Safety is an issue, but it is not the big issue. The big issue is proving to
the
world this technology works. If it is proven this technology works then it will
be implemented around the
If the powers that be try to get in the way of this technology being utilized
then I think Rossi needs to offer the technology to China, India, North Korea,
or some third world nation and vow to never license it to the USA.
From: Jones Beene
The issue is not if global warming is happening, but if we are prepared for the
challenges facing us. There are changes coming. Nothing ever stays the same.
Sooner or later we will face significant global warming, a mini ice age, a
solar
flare, an asteroid impact, or some other issue that
on Self Sustain Mode
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am sure they [NRC] know it exists. They might not be taking it seriously.
Why are you sure they know it exists? Have you been in contact with someone in
the NRC who says it exists? (You need not reveal the name of your contact
I can't believe you are talking like this right after you suggested the NRC
shut
down Rossi's factory and force him to spend 100 million dollars on testing.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, January 22, 2011 4:41:26
Fusing Fear and Science - Lets stick to Nickel and Hydrogen
Humans fear the unknown. If they do not understand something their first
reaction is usually to run from it or attack it. Certain parties that
understand
this can use that fear to their advantage. There are examples of this
I think there will be even more data posted Monday
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/01/report-ufficiale-esperimento-della.html
I think that Cold Fusion technology will totally change the world.
I think that NOTHING will be considered impossible again.
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, January 23, 2011 1:16:22 AM
Subject: [Vo]: The tides have
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Levi%20and%20Bianchini%20Reports.pdf
Hello Everyone,
We have been on here talking about Andrea Rossi's cold fusion technology for
about a week or so now. It seems to me we still have a lot of questions. I have
a proposition.
Why don't we as a group organize a list of questions and have a representative
pass it along to Rossi
The 1 MW reactor is composed of 125 10KW units
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, January 25, 2011 2:52:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Times of India reports on ICCF16 and Rossi
As noted, the gadget is reported as 20 kW in the
He is very jealous. From what I hear, he has only been able to produce small
amounts of output (perhaps 10-50 watts). Rossi has produced a technology that
generates huge amounts of output. Rossi once stated that a 50cc reactor core
has a maximum safe output of 10 kilowatts. The problem with the
I think that there are a group of competitors that are working together to try
and bash Rossi, so they can slow down the commercialization of the E-Cat until
they can make their systems produce 1/10th as much output. For the time being
they are putting aside their differences.
I agree that hot fusion was the biggest boondoggle of the 21st century.
Cold fusion is going to make everyone realize how the mainstream scientific
community kept us in the dark ages.
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
I think the answer is simple. He is jealous. In one breath he claims that Rossi
is producing excess heat and wants him to share information. Next, he is making
skeptical remarks. It makes it clear to me that he wishes he could produce the
same output Rossi can. So instead of admitting that, he
Hello,
Congrats on being able to test an E-Cat.
I would like to request that you utilize two, single modules in the test. One
with hydrogen, and another without hydrogen. The one with no hydrogen would be
the control. You would input electrical power into the control just like you
would the
Please ask for two E-Cats to be tested. One with hydrogen and one without
hydrogen.
In all the tests that have been done so far, there has not been a control
used. A test with a control would blow away the thermal inertia hypothesis.
It would also confirm beyond a doubt that the E-Cat with
This guy is obviously very desperate.
I think Larsen is jealous that Rossi has been able to build practical cold
fusion systems, and he has not.
He is so desperate he has Krivit helping him attack those who do not support
his theory.
When the E-Cat technology is powering the world, Larsen
I think this is very good news.
If he can create electricity even moderately efficiently, this technology is
going to change the world -- BIG TIME!
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional technologies
will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one megawatt
I would like to start this thread as a place where details about the deal
between the US military and Andrea Rossi can be discussed. In my opinion, it is
a very big deal that a very experienced engineer not only validated the
technology on Oct. 28th, but now the military is purchasing an
The fact Rossi is telling the truth is clear and obvious at this point.
Your irrational skepticism is what is mysterious. When the E-Cat technology is
powering the world I hope you will reveal your true identity, and admit to the
fact you trolled forums across the net trying to attack it. Of
In my opinion, Piantelli's work is meaningless. He was not able to do anything
with Ni-H fusion.
Piantelli is like a person who discovers heavy crude oil. Andrea Rossi is the
person who was able to refine it into high grade jet fuel, and use it to power
an aircraft.
Anyone who thinks that
A tax on cold fusion devices?
The last thing we need is another tax!
Our government wastes billions of dollars as it is.
They could save billions by ending hot fusion research, and bringing our troops
home from around the world.
The ITER needs to be abolished.
I think what we need to do is convince the world that the E-Cat works, and then
promote a peaceful uprising of the people to force the patent office to grand
Rossi's patents.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday,
I don't agree with the government using tax dollars to pay cold fusion
inventors.
In my opinion, the government needs to be forced (peacefully) to grant Rossi's
patent.
When the government tries to fix a problem they helped create, 9 out of 10
times they make it worse.
Of course they are not like Rossi. They have not designed a paradigm shifting
technology. Instead, they are just searching for some particle, with no idea of
how to make it into a technology.
By the way, Rossi has tested his device over and over again. He is satisfied
the technology works and
I am all for vertical agriculture, but I am totally opposed to a global basic
income. I do not support socialism or communism.
With cold fusion technology, the price of everything will go down. Even a job
at McDonalds will be capable of paying for a nice house, nice cars, etc. We can
have a
I can't wait until the cost of everything has went down dramatically. I think
combining cold fusion with robotics and nanotechnology could allow us to end up
in a world where there is no such thing as scarcity. Everything could be dirt
cheap, and a simple part-time job would allow someone to
I think the election cycle this year is going to be very interesting. Actually,
I think it will be more exciting than ever before!
With the US military satisfied the Rossi technology works, purchasing thirteen
systems, and helping with R and D, I think the politicians are bound to be told
What the heck is stopping someone from taking private money and doing research
in their basement?
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley and other professors can only
Can you describe the first test that is left out of the PDF file?
How many slides were you not allowed to post?
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Private information
Does anyone know where the following paper can be located?
A. Carnera, S. Focardi, A. Rossi, to be published on Arxiv
It is referenced in the following paper.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=53
I think it is a paper that Arxiv rejected.
I think the paper would be very interesting
So where is the data obtained from the mass spec data taken by U. Padua?
Is it in the paper, A. Carnera, S. Focardi, A. Rossi, to be published on Arxiv
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 7:04 PM
All of those big government scientists should be de-funded. Especially all the
hot fusion scientists -- every last one! Unfortunately, the Tea Party has been
corrupted by liberal leaning individuals who want to keep spending tax dollars
unconstitutionally, on projects the government has no
I agree. I want more information.
As I see it right now, we have zero proof that they have built any working
reactor cores themselves. I think it is likely that a long time ago Rossi
loaned them a few cores to test, but I do not know if they have built a
working, practical cold fusion system.
Krivit has doomed his career by his attacks on Rossi and his constant push to
support Widom Larsen theory.The fact is Andrea Rossi has proven beyond any
reasonable doubt that his Ni-H technology works as claimed. When Rossi's home
E-Cat units start going on the market, Krivit is going to have
I find it disgusting how NASA is spewing W L propaganda. Of course it is the
logical theory to adopt, since the last thing NASA would ever want to do is
admit that cold fusion is real. They would rather say little gray aliens are
providing the power, than to admit fusion is taking place.
Does anyone know why NASA mentioned carbon along with nickel and hydrogen?
Is NASA proposing the use of carbon as a catalyst?
Have any of these scientists went into any greater detail?
Hello Everyone,
The obvious anti-Rossi agenda on this list is getting absolutely disgusting.
To address one issue, there is a very simple explanation of why Rossi did not
pay the University of Bologna.
Simply put, he is devoting all of his time, energy, and most likely FINANCIAL
RESOURCES on
What do we know about Steven Krivit in regards to Widom Larsen theory?
It seems obvious that he is eager to push the theory at every opportunity. In
fact, he has went on a rampage against the term cold fusion. What is so
ridiculous about this is that even if WL theory is correct (which I do not
connected with their company. He
gets money to make libelling against us also from other 2 well identified
entities. We will give detailed and throughly information in due time.
Everything in due time, we will get some fun.
On 02/22/2012 03:29 PM, noone noone wrote:
What is his exact relationship
Exactly. I want verification -- not just rumors or guesses.
Due to Krivit's behavior I could guess that he may have some connection to the
originators of WL theory, but I cannot prove it. I have zero proof.
Does anyone here have any proof that actually links Krivit to Larsen, Widom, or
Lattice
But whose technology are they going to be testing?
Possibility #1 -- Their own tech they developed from scratch. (THIS WOULD BE
WORTH CELEBRATING!)
Possibility #2 -- A copy cat of Rossi's technology, using his intellectual
property without permission. (This would be a horrible tragedy.)
hope they sell a billion
Hyperions.
From: Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com
To: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
If the devices work, I think all options are OK. Apple
Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
To: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
from the data they give :
the H2 pressure is higher (50bars)
no radiofrequency
capacity to work much above 400C (600C,900C)
many catalyst tested
breakthrough that will change the
world.
From: Charly Sistovaris charlysi...@gmail.com
To: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
#1 I doubt it
#2 #3 the only tragedy is if ecat's a hoax
.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Possibility #2 -- A copy cat of Rossi's technology, using his intellectual
property without
, so be it.
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
From Jed,
noone noone wrote:
Possibility #2 -- A copy cat of Rossi's
...@hotmail.com
To: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
That's not going to happen. Almost everyone who has made a lot of money off of
new technology has stolen
noone noone sez:
If I invented a billion dollar technology and someone copied
it without my permission, I would not accept a trillion
dollars from a lawsuit.
The only thing I would accept is for the other company to be
forced to re-call all their products. Then I would make money
by selling
other people's lives to be better too. I've not suffered as much as many
people in the world, but I know what poverty is like. Sometimes doing the right
thing means that you have to endure hardship.
From: Jarold McWilliams oldja...@hotmail.com
To: noone noone
to the situation as we need both companies. I personally
think the world needs LENR a lot more than Rossi needs money and I think it is
prudent for the lawyers to argue about IP later as is usually the case.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l
afternoon, so please accept my apologies
for continuing this protracted discussion with noone noone:
The world according to noone noone:
If I invented a billion dollar technology and someone copied
it without my permission, I would not accept a trillion
dollars from a lawsuit.
The only thing I
hope the reality of things are
not as horrible as you portray.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
We
on. There will be plenty of money to go around if this technology
is a go
On Friday, February 24, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
We do not need both companies if one company has stolen intellectual property.
We do NOT know if this is the case. I am
, February 24, 2012 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
It's been a slow-news Friday afternoon, so please accept my apologies
for continuing this protracted discussion with noone noone:
The world according to noone noone:
If I invented a billion dollar technology and someone copied
silly and is most likely someone's idea of a
joke.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Feb 24, 2012 7:02 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
I am not an expert at law, but I would strive to stop
PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
If I did decide to take money (if I thought it was the best way to fight
against the company using my technology), I would let it be known to the courts
that any money awarded to me would be instantly
to stand up
for himself. By doing so, he will also be standing up for all future inventors.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Test day in Greece time
noone noone
This is absolutely pathetic. We have been promised test data over and over
again for over a year, and Defkalion has yet again provide something totally
different. In my opinion, this is an insult to all those who have been
following them. If they wanted to work in the dark they had every
their claims.
It's time for Defkalion to apologize, go black, and do their work in total
secrecy, or provide some hard data like they have promised.
From: Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com
To: noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9
I heard that a long time ago during one of his tests there was a box that was
labeled Tesla coil that had a wire that fed into the reactor. I think Rossi has
probably experimented with multiple types of radio frequency stimulation, along
with electric discharges.
By the way, Cesium cannot be
This is from a posting on E-Cat World.
The Ridiculous Demand for Excessive E-Cat Proof
I enjoyed following the E-Cat saga in the year 2011. Although I still enjoy
following it to this day (things are really getting exciting with 600C steam),
last year was particularly interesting. Just
You should specify that you think the tests were inadequate to show detailed
measurements, but not inadequate to show that large amounts of excess energy
were produced. I agree that many of the tests could have been performed and
setup better, but I think they were all good enough to show
Where does that reference come from?
The closest thing I have been able to find is the following page.
Can you tell us anything more about this replication of the Rossi system?
What catalysts are they using?
Would you please clarify what you mean by 800 watts per liter of powder? Do
they
have to have one liter of nickel powder in the reactor to produce 800 watts.
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
