Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Great work! Good answers. The parts relating to calorimetry look okay to me, at first glance: What type of flow measurement sensor was used? Can you list the > manufacturer and model of the flow sensor? > A flow measurement sensor was used, a Rain Gauge supplied Oregon > Scientific - Weather

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

From: Jed Rothwell Someone pointed out to me that at such low temperatures, you would probably use the hot fluid to heat the equipment directly before returning it, rather than going through a heat exchanger. - Jed Didn’t you see the post on NBF from GoatGuy - which nails the easy way to

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

As far as I know, nobody has any idea what was in the customer's equipment. Presumably it started as steam and the condensate was later returned to the 1 MW plant at varying temperatures. The implication is that the customer's side was less than 60C. On 7/3/2016 9:38 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Parkhomov's choice of rain gauge for flow meter is an interesting choice - fits perfectly with his style. This flow meter is of the bistable conical cup type. It flops back and forth as each cup fills to a certain MASS of water: [I am inserting a small picture - hope it comes through] ​ When

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jones Beene wrote: > Basically, in the center of the “reactor shelter” is a box labeled “water > reservoir” which has 2 inlets and 2 outlets. > > Inlet 1, top = tap water from municipal line > > Inlet 2, bot = return from steam condensers > > Outlet 1, top = water to first

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: As far as I know, nobody has any idea what was in the customer's equipment. > Nothing was in there. I.H. and others used various methods to look for heat from the customer site. They found no trace of it. There was no equipment using a detectable level

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

"Itwasclever on Rossi’s part, but the type of cleaverthat can cost him dearly, in the end." Your bias is showing again. Goatguy suggested a possible method to scam the results and then you take it as read that that was done. Really? It would have been easier to fudge the sensors or the

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

There you go again. IH was not allowed in the building but you claim there was nothing there, based on what IH told you. To think that IH could discern anything from an IR reading of the building walls is really pathetic. Jed. "If that were the case, the waste heat would be easily

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jed, You never replied to my request for a reference confirming what you said that IH offered a customer but Rossi turned it down. On 7/3/2016 11:16 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Jones Beene > wrote: Basically,in the center of the “reactor

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

So let me see if I’ve got this straight. It’s not biased to the repeat the fabrications of a delusional career criminal, and to persist with non-stop trolling of this “Rossi says” crap, but it is biased for anyone else to comment on the most likely way he pulled off the latest scam? From:

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

"Your bias is showing again. Goatguy suggested a possible method to scam the results and then you take it as read that that was done. Really?" It is altogether possible that he was not so clever as GG thinks, as Jed suggests, but could have still taken advantage of the design flaw noted by GG.

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

The steam pressure would be closer to 2 psig at 104. What you discount is that the temperature would have been higher if the pressure needed to be higher. It is not unreasonable to assume 2 psi was all that was needed with the outlet pipe size used. Remember that Rossi used a stethoscope

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: Jed, "Correction: With a counterflow heat exchanger, the cold fluid will > be an average temperature somewhere between 104 and 60 deg C." > What cold fluid are you talking about? > The warm fluid and cold fluid in the heat exchanger. Someone pointed

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jed, "Correction: With a counterflow heat exchanger, the cold fluid will be an average temperature somewhere between 104 and 60 deg C." What cold fluid are you talking about? I thought we were told the return temperature to the 1 MW plant varied but was typically ~60C. Because it varied it

[Vo]:LENR is hidden in details

It is already a certainty- LENR is hidden in details. What we don't know: in which details and how it hides there. But we will find out soon! See please: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/07/jul-03-2016-lenr-is-hidden-in-details.html HAPPY JULY 4th to all my US readers! Peter -- Dr. Peter

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

What "fabrications of a delusional career criminal"? You just repeated what Goatguy said without an iota of evidence to show it was true, writing that that was what happened. So no, you haven't "got this straight." On 7/3/2016 12:49 PM, Jones Beene wrote: So let me see if I’ve got this

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

I have no reason to think Dewey Weaver is a credible witness. I don't know what happened and am quite willing to wait for solid facts. The pathological skeptics jump on every wild flight of imagination and state that is what happened, while in fact being clueless. Rossi was right when he

RE: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

From: a.ashfield Rossi was right when he forecast that no test would ever be accepted but it would take the sale of working commercial reactors to quiet the critics. Rossi was right, was he? LOL. That is you informed opinion? Then tell us why the skeptics aren’t they quiet now – since Rossi

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

"I have no reason to think Dewey Weaver is a credible witness. I don't know what happened and am quite willing to wait for solid facts. The pathological skeptics jump on every wild flight of imagination and state that is what happened, while in fact being clueless. Rossi was right when he

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jones Beene, AA "Rossi was right when he forecast that no test would ever be accepted but it would take the sale of working commercial reactors to quiet the critics." JB. Rossi was right, was he? LOL. That is you informed opinion?" AA. Is that really the best you can do? Pray tell me what

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jack, I give Rossi the benefit of the doubt, until proven otherwise. As I said, I don't know, but neither do the skeptics. If you don't think there have been wild flights of imagination you have not been following the story. GG's analysis means nothing: it is just another possible way of

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

I understand Adrian. You give AR the benefit of the doubt, but everyone else gets the doubt. "AR says" carries more weight in your opinion than Jed, the people Jed has talked to who have seen the data, Dewey Weaver, and IH. Multiple sources say the swapped out flow meter was inappropriate, so

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: > But I have reason whatsoever to believe that somebody's idea of how Rossi > could cheat was actually implemented. > Yes, you do have a clear idea. The person who told you how Rossi cheats is Rossi himself. He said refused to allow anyone into his

[Vo]:Article: Paper-Based Microbial Fuel Cell Operates without External Power

A team of researchers from Iowa State University in Ames have demonstrated a proof-of-concept three dimensional paper-based microbial fuel cell (or MFC) that could take advantage of capillary action … http://flip.it/WQ4L9 Sent via Flipboard , your personal magazine. Get it

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

a.ashfield wrote: Jed we have been through this twice already. I do not find anything Rossi > has said shows that he was cheating. > There are none so blind as those who will not see. You have no idea what machinery was in the J M Products' plant although you > also

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jack, " You give AR the benefit of the doubt, but everyone else gets the doubt. " I said I didn't know if Rossi was right. But I have reason whatsoever to believe that somebody's idea of how Rossi could cheat was actually implemented. Even the author didn't say it was. All the recent anti

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

Jed we have been through this twice already. I do not find anything Rossi has said shows that he was cheating. The agreement at the start of the trial was that no one from IH should visit J M Products, nor that anyone from J M Products was allowed to visit the 1 MW plant. Presumably both had

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Bob Higgins wrote: Parkhomov's choice of rain gauge for flow meter is an interesting choice - > fits perfectly with his style. This flow meter is of the bistable conical > cup type. It flops back and forth as each cup fills to a certain MASS of > water: [I am

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Bob— Great communication with AP. It would be nice to get AP to confirm that D does not change the energy generation of the experiment except in so far as the H concentration is reduced. In his answers to your question about deuterium AP seemed to hope it had no effect on the reaction???