RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

2016 5:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation Bob, This is exactly the type of experiment I had in mind. Add about 10% LAD to the LAH and re-run the series of experiments to see how the XH compares

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Bob, This is exactly the type of experiment I had in mind. Add about 10% LAD to the LAH and re-run the series of experiments to see how the XH compares to plain LAH. You are also correct that this may tell us a lot about what reaction is occurring. It has been held by many LENR researchers that

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

016 10:08 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation You missed my point - and, of course, I could have said it better. The problem is that a failed quasi-replication (Ahern's experiment was FAR from replicat

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

6 6:42 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation From: Bob Higgins Mathieu Valat has some LiAlD4 given to him by Jean-Paul Biberian. I asked Mathieu if he would be willing to send some to Parkhomov

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Bob, I couldn't agree more. Even F & P's experiment produced XH but the academics were looking for tell tale nuclear radiation - and there wasn't any. It should also be a warning to those eager to write off Rossi. He has done thousands of experiments since 2011 and appears to have found out

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

You missed my point - and, of course, I could have said it better. The problem is that a failed quasi-replication (Ahern's experiment was FAR from replication) does not mean the reaction does not work. It means the experimenter failed to adequately replicate variables that were important, about

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

From: Bob Higgins As we have all seen in this field, failed quasi-replications don't mean squat. No at all! On the contrary, quasi-replications mean quite a lot, if not everything. AP had his first quasi-success in performing a quasi-replication of the hot-cat, and he has done little else

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

I think AP's success is more likely due to the pre-treatment protocol and H2 pressure during time of excess heat, rather than just the "fuel mix" or the heater coil fields. Notice in AP's latest reported experiment that the fuel was soaked at 500-600C for about 8 days as pre-treatment. The H2

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

From: Bob Higgins Mathieu Valat has some LiAlD4 given to him by Jean-Paul Biberian. I asked Mathieu if he would be willing to send some to Parkhomov to increase the possibility that Parkhomov would run an experiment with D enrichment to look for increase in excess power. Bob, Brian Ahern

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

of the world. From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 6:45 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation Mathieu Valat has some LiAlD4 given to him by Jean-Paul Biberian. I asked Mathieu if he

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Mathieu Valat has some LiAlD4 given to him by Jean-Paul Biberian. I asked Mathieu if he would be willing to send some to Parkhomov to increase the possibility that Parkhomov would run an experiment with D enrichment to look for increase in excess power. Mathieu was all for that. I also asked

RE: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

??? Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 7:16 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov re

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Bob Higgins wrote: Parkhomov's choice of rain gauge for flow meter is an interesting choice - > fits perfectly with his style. This flow meter is of the bistable conical > cup type. It flops back and forth as each cup fills to a certain MASS of > water: [I am

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Parkhomov's choice of rain gauge for flow meter is an interesting choice - fits perfectly with his style. This flow meter is of the bistable conical cup type. It flops back and forth as each cup fills to a certain MASS of water: [I am inserting a small picture - hope it comes through] ​ When

Re: [Vo]: Q and A with Parkhomov regarding his latest presentation

Great work! Good answers. The parts relating to calorimetry look okay to me, at first glance: What type of flow measurement sensor was used? Can you list the > manufacturer and model of the flow sensor? > A flow measurement sensor was used, a Rain Gauge supplied Oregon > Scientific - Weather