WISPA list server check
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
I carry a very high deductible (like $10K per incident). I keep
insurance strictly for liability coverage and for catastrophic
coverage like if our office burns down or a tornado comes through and
wipes everything out. My rates are low and I do not plan to ever make
a claim. Insurance companies
,
John Scrivner
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
Dear Valued Customer,
Tranzeo went through the cupboards and did some spring cleaning. We have
the following surplus stock of NEW radios and are offering them at an
incredible one time Savings
Here is the quick answer:
802.16d is a fixed only technology (no mobility) which performs quite
well for delivering broadband to homes and businesses. Highly
available. Secure. More expensive, more scalable and somewhat higher
latency than similar fixed technologies based on 802.11 and other
Cell radius= 30km
The point is for a TCO, that's one tower site to cover a
20km radius, meaning less leases per month of 1k or more, so isntead of 4
tower sites to cover this area ( and pay 4k per month )
So...how are you breaking the laws of physics with this system? Unless
you are
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment Daniel, but please God, let's not have anyone
thinking they can build a 30 km radius cell with our stuff or anyone's
stuff in WiMAX. I don't care if you can see your dog running away for
three
?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:32 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors
On Thu
No.
Scriv
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Chuck Bartosch
ch...@clarityconnect.com wrote:
John,
Is this with diversity antennas?
Chuck
On Apr 23, 2009, at 4:41 PM, John Scrivner wrote:
I was not saying you CANNOT possibly do that distance. It was being
referenced as a typical cell
Use a standoff bracket to mount an omni.
Scriv
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Adam Goodman a...@wispring.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to set up 2 antennas (East and West more or less) but
will not get more than 30 subs between the 2. I would like to connect
both antennas to one AP.
I would suggest taking this up with your attorney.
Scriv
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote:
I recently set up an AP on a nearby village's water tower and they are now
sending me income tax papers saying I need file with their village. Our
office is not
This is almost certainly multipath interference where reflections are
cancelling out the signal. Diversity is the only solution I know of
for this.
Scriv
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Jason Wallace supp...@azii.net wrote:
Everyone,
I had trouble during an install today regarding
Shielded Cat 5 and Ferrite Beads are your friend. I have been where
you are and this fixed it all for me.
Scriv
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
I have an odd situation, I have 2-2.4 180* sectors MT RB411 and 5-5.8 StarOS
War1 backhaul radios and a RB600
Sorry Stuart... I could not resist telling the WISP world it is your
birthday today. I wish we could all get together and make beer floats with
your ice cream. Hahaha!Have you ever done that? I might actually do
that with a Guiness I think. I am a little bit twisted though!
:-)
Scriv
I need a Waverider CCU today if possible. Lightning damage and our spare one
is not working. Will drive to you to get it. Old or new model CCU will work.
Call me asap 618-237-2387.
Thank you,
John Scrivner
WISPA
for that
matter) then email me offlist please and let me know quantity and price for
those.
Thank you,
John Scrivner
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, John Scrivner j...@scrivner.com wrote:
I need a Waverider CCU today if possible. Lightning damage and our spare
one is not working. Will drive to you
if
anyone had seen anything else cause this. We have had limited success in
dealing with interference in 900 MHz previously so we are hoping there is
something else we can try before completely bailing on the band in those
locations. Any ideas are appreciated.
John Scrivner
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Tranzeo 900 Latency
We have a couple of sectors of 900 MHz Tranzeo which were running fine
previously but seem to experience
I am searching for spare gear. Lightning just took another old Waverider
CCU. If any of you have some collecting dust I am buying. Hit me offlist
with subject line of Waverider CCU.
Thanks guys,
Scriv
WISPA Wants
. It
almost appears they want us to fail.
John Scrivner
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Patrick Leary ple...@apertonet.com wrote:
Regardless of your tech choice -- Moto, 802.11-based, WiMAX or other, I
am interested to know what are the greatest barriers to growth and why?
Some possibilities
Years ago I looked into what it would take to sell access to the
school. erate is set up so that one company provides all telecom needs
to the school. Voice, data etc. The only companies that can do that
are the ilec or a clec.
This is not true in Illinois. We have what is called a SPIN
The unfortunate dialog below is a perfect demonstration of why Matt was
correct in saying this document should have never been circulated
outside of WISPA until it was in its final form.
What led to the Senate Commerce Committee position paper idea?
Who is asking for this paper?
What are the
to go into WISPA membership only list discussion areas now and the
topic is closed for public discussion. Topic closed.
Deepest regrets,
John Scrivner
John Scrivner wrote:
The unfortunate dialog below is a perfect demonstration of why Matt
was correct in saying this document should have never been
Testing WISPA list server
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
We have good luck with Linksys. If the customer is a larger business
client or someone who needs higher reliability and better features we
often load up Mikrotik on a Routerboard or WRAP board.
Scriv
Bo Hamilton wrote:
Wondering what routers are all of you using at client installs? What
them say they are the best out there at any
price.
Scriv
John Scrivner wrote:
We have good luck with Linksys. If the customer is a larger business
client or someone who needs higher reliability and better features we
often load up Mikrotik on a Routerboard or WRAP board.
Scriv
Bo Hamilton
Here is a copy of a report from Reuters regarding the latest results on
FCC Form 477 totals. As you can see we are not even mentioned. I guess
those of you who decided we should not fill out the form got what you
wantedobscurity and no credit.
Broadband lines jump 32 pct in new US FCC
Please read below and see my remarks on this feeble attempt to help
Americans.
New spectrum legislation crafted
By Dan O'Shea
Apr 5, 2006 12:02 PM
Five members of the U.S. House of Representatives have announced new
legislation that allow broadband wireless carriers and other companies
to
House Spectrum Bill
and submit a competing proposal that has a chance to do some good.
Respectfully,
John Scrivner
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV spectrum
Please read below and see my remarks on this feeble attempt to help
Americans.
New spectrum legislation crafted
By Dan O'Shea
I cannot believe I have never read about this before. Is it an April
Fool's joke? According to the sources I have seen this was released a
couple of years back. Can anyone confirm or deny the validity of this
information? Does anyone have a link that leads to a description of
exactly what can
Well engineered links with proper installation, lightning protection,
battery backup and good gear will be just as reliable (if not more) as
any land line system in my opinion. The rub is that many wireless links
are poorly engineered, bad gear and not installed well. Garbage
in...garbage out.
Try different radios and/or system OS. You could run Mikrotik or Star OS
on the board for little money. If it is not a motherboard issue then I
think there is something that the OS or radios do not like specific to
that location.
Scriv
rabbtux rabbtux wrote:
All,
we have a 50' tower that
)
*From:* John Scrivner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Fri 07/04/2006 15:07
*To:* Frannie Wellings
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] TV spectrum
I need a copy of this bill right away.
Scriv
Frannie Wellings wrote:
Hey John,
The Inslee bill is a good bill
to 614 MHz. This is a COMPLETELY different meaning than what is
portrayed in your press release and has caused a great deal of
misinformation about this bill. PLEASE correct this so others do not
make the same mistake.
With regrets,
John Scrivner
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
tasks. They’re also upgradeable to run on our
cellular
telemetry system.
Apologies to all,
Dawn DiPietro
John Scrivner wrote:
We have a problem. It appears the press release we read earlier was
wrong. Attached is the exact language of the bill. It is asking for
ALL tv channels
I do not have the link to the proceeding but t is known as 04-186 and a
quick Google should get you to it. It is on the FCC.gov website
someplace. Anyone have a link to it? The power limits are spelled out
there I believe. The public process on 04-186 is complete now. We will
have what we
are to have more influence and credibility in making
policy that helps our industry.
Best of luck,
John Scrivner
I want to keep interferance to a minimum, as well as control costs.
My environment includes lots of desert, and single story buildings.
Lee
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless
I sure thought I saw certs once on their site. I guess maybe you could
call them and ask for the URL to their FCC certs? If you see this then
passing those along here would sure be nice.
Thanks,
Scriv
Jason Wallace wrote:
John Scrivner:
Sadly the best Wifi solutions available do not have
and
not mainstream and there is some division is a real strech. Brad
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
With that said I still think Alvarion
Internet, NO WIRES!
-
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
I
Wireless Broadband Systems
www.wbisp.com
781-566-2053 ext 6201
1-888-wbsystem (888) 927-9783
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 1:58 AM
To: WISPA
I just called them. They are asking $732.00 each for these units. They
are not an integrated antenna and radio as I first thought. They have an
external N connector on them.
The guy I spoke with said that the FCC certs are pending approval and
that the unit is being tested for approval now. I
Hello Patrick, welcome back.
For some of you folks who are new to this list or wireless, Patrick has
been a big friend to the fixed broadband wireless industry for many
years. Patrick formerly held the position of Chief Evangelist for
Alvarion before accepting his promotion to Vice President
Jeff, I read Patrick's post before yours. I am also glad to see you
here. WISPA has been working hard to gain access to spectrum and better
regulatory issues for our industry. We have seen some real successes. We
still have a long way to go but the WISP industry has been making great
gains
Marlon has been asking us for a while to give him feedback on Universal
Service. We have not helped him as much as we should have. He asked for
input from the WISPA membership originally. I am asking everyone,
members or not, if you can help. Marlon has been asked by a member of
the House
I am planning to attend.
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
Is anyone attending ISPCON in Baltimore next month?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
making the call to get the same data.
Scriv
John Scrivner wrote:
I just called them. They are asking $732.00 each for these units. They
are not an integrated antenna and radio as I first thought. They have
an external N connector on them.
The guy I spoke with said that the FCC certs are pending
I know this would be a bunch of work but can you either send us some
screen shots of this in action or possibly give a public address to the
hotspot side so we can see what this feature looks like in action? I
would really like to see the ad feature running and I am having trouble
visualizing
Does anyone out there serve rural Carbondale, Illinois? If you do then I
have a potential client for you. Let me know.
Thanks,
Scriv
begin:vcard
fn:John Scrivner
n:Scrivner;John
org:Mt. Vernon. Net, Inc.
adr;dom:PO Box 1582;;1 Dr Park Road Suite H1;Mt. Vernon;Il;62864
email;internet:[EMAIL
bless you and your efforts,
John Scrivner
-- Original Message --
From: David Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 14:03:00 -0500
Dear Mr. Scrivner,
My name is David Maddox and I am an AmeriCorps member volunteering with
the Louisiana Delta
the job.. The unlicensed 900 MHz technology we are using is an
absolute necessity in making rural broadband options available today in
all of the United States.
John Scrivner
President
Mt. Vernon. Net, Inc.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org
gun.
Good bye,
John Scrivner
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
WISPA works to make sure that when government decides they will be
taking a role in our industry that they do so without harming us. You
cannot lobby anonymously. You CAN stand and be counted or hide and cower
under a rock in obscurity. If you are one of the rock dwellers I am sure
you are not
at least the spirit of
the policy as outlined above. Do we want to continue to allow policy to
happen around us or do we want to start building policy that is forward
thinking enough to empower us all?
John Scrivner
PS. If you are reading this and you have not paid your WISPA dues then
go to http
Replies inline:
Patrick Leary wrote:
I favor substantial use rules and also agree in rejecting squatters rights.
A method of issuing licenses I like is the following:
1. licenses are broken up into regional and local.
Why not license by base station? Then a provider cannot ignore
Check this out from the Pew report. It appears that fixed wireless is
much bigger than what even I thought. According to this report 8% of
all broadband connections in the US are delivered via fixed broadband
wireless. That means you guys! Woo Hoo!
Scriv
--
WISPA Wireless List:
for once it is nice to see us represented in some
statistically important degree. I am not really that concerned about the
exact number of customers. It is just nice to see us making the report
in some meaningful way.
Scriv
David E. Smith wrote:
John Scrivner wrote:
Check this out from
! (That reminds
me...where is that 5.4 GHz band!)
:-)
Scriv
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
We were banned from doing business with them because we requested a
return once. Not kidding.
Scriv
Rudolph Worrell wrote:
Can someone give me their honest opinion about doing business with
www.hyperlinktech.com. They seem to have a great deal of antennas and cable
but I am not sure they
I will pass along these final thoughts I have on the issues I had with
Hyperlink. First of all I do not unduly burden my vendors and I pay for
problems that I bring on myself. I also pay for support from vendors
that I feel is beyond normal pre-sales support. The situation I had with
them for
The plan for any reasonable mesh design calls for mounting mesh nodes on
street light poles with utility company pole attachment agreements and
right of way access from municipalities. OTARD has nothing to do with that.
Scriv
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Ever wonder what kind of
There is a Principle Member's list which is made up of WISP operators
who have paid for Principle Membership. That list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] We
only have a couple of Associate members so have not made up a list just
for paid Associate members yet. We are considering other list resources
for
Can you or someone explain what double VLAN is? I have never heard of
such a thing. How can it be used to help us?
Thanks,
Scriv
Yo may want to look at Alvarion. Alvarion does support VLAN. new
Firmware4 supports double VLAN also.
Alvarion used to have one model that was designed to have a
OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-4000 Cell
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:39 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject
guid
e09186a00801f0f4a.html
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 8:39 AM
To: WISPA General List
It is not a clock issue. All the messages that were sent with old dates
were already delivered previously. These are duplicate messages.
Scriv
David E. Smith wrote:
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
I ogt them too...
I peeked at the headers (sorry, that's my schtick) and while the Date:
- From: Ken DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John
Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: 1st draft Spectrum Sharing Test-bed 06-89.doc
Marlon,
Comments in-line, just where
It is not a question of how many customers will want this MTU
adjustment feature. Setting MTU size should be elementary for your
firmware guys. It is an option in any open embedded OS I have seen for
wireless management. I have seen MTU size options on $100 APs. MTU size
is something that is
Can you give more details on the versions that require a license key?
What will they cost? What features will they have specifically? What is
FIPS 197? Could this FIPS 197 service allow for service to medical
facilities also? I would like to be able to approach the hospitals,
doctor's offices,
Please read this note from our friend Frannie from Free Press. She needs
our help right away! We need to call these Senators.
Scriv
Hi John and Marlon,
We have a crucial vote this week in the Senate Commerce Committee. The
Committee will vote on the telecom bill (S.2686) - it's not a good
Check this out. We net'd an increase in dialup over the last week of
plus 2 dialup customers. That's right folks. In this day and age in the
summer time no less. We added more dialup than we turned off. I can't
believe it but I am not going to turn them away for sure. Dialup still
pays a bunch
If you work with your Muni (many of us do) then it can be your life
blood in some cases. We do not use local tax dollars but we do use water
towers, we connect the police departments to cop cars and fire
departments to each other. Stuff like this IS the promise of Muni BB and
it is a great
I guess I will answer my own post again. Am I the only guy who called
these Senators after we all put together the list of every member of the
US Senate Commerce Committee and their phone numbers? You can lead a
horse to water...
Scriv
John Scrivner wrote:
Sorry to answer my own post but I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 4:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Critical Time for White Spaces
I guess I will answer my own post again. Am I the only guy who called
these Senators after
*** This is a paid
advertisement which has been approved by the WISPA Board of
Directors.***
WISP-Training.com will be doing a 4-day
training session covering Mikrotik's RouterOS software. This
training
session will be held in St.
Louis, MO on
Jul 31-Aug 3. Find out more
at
*** This is a paid
advertisement which has been approved by the WISPA Board of
Directors.***
WISP-Training.com will be doing a 4-day
training session covering Mikrotik's RouterOS software. This
training
session will be held in St.
Louis, MO on
Jul 31-Aug 3. Find out more
at
I just wanted to send out my personal thanks to Butch Evans for taking
the positive step of asking how to advertise on the WISPA lists and then
actually following through and paying as he did. We have seen many
attempts by distributors, vendors, etc. to use WISPA resources to their
advantage
Someone had suggested that a Nortel router could be used to provide
failover between two broadband connections. Can you please help me? We
bought one of these boxes and now my sysadmin tells me we have no
ability to use this box because Nortel will not give us access to the
configuration
For some reason Alex is having trouble posting to the WISPA General List
so here is what he was trying to send:
Alex wrote,
I aon't write for this list any longer, but thought I'd drop in some
thoughts that may be useful to you. Perhaps useful to those of you who
are just getting into being
I have seen some degradation of the content of the WISPA list server of
late. A little humor and off topic chatter is ok but we probably need to
improve our signal to noise ratio just a little bit guys please. Let's
all step up the level of professionalism required to keep the list a
vital
Dori,
Please send a copy of MVN's Wireless Subscriber Agreement to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] That address is only paid WISPA Principle Members. I
want to make it clear to all of you that I am sharing this only as a
reference of what I am doing. I do not warranty the use of this document
in any way. I
From what I read all they did was grant the WCAI the right to write a
longer statement than is normally allowed. This is not an award of any
significance that I can see..
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
AMENDMENT OF PARTS 1, 21, 73, 74 AND 101 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES TO
FACILITATE THE PROVISION OF
http://www.panduit.com/
Find your nearest dealer or become a dealer. They train you for free.
Less than $500 worth of tools and you can terminate fiber forever with
low-cost easy to use parts. Why pay someone to come and put ends on your
fiber when you can do it yourself? I figured it out
I am assuming 2.4 GHz WiFi access? If that is the case then use two 90
degree sectors overlooking the same coverage area. I would try to place
some vertical or horizontal displacement between the antennas if at all
possible to eliminate any noise introduction between APs. (This
displacement is
Peter,
Thank you for passing along this success story for Optivon. They
recently joined WISPA as a vendor member. I am glad to see that their
belief in partnering with WISPs to use WISP platforms for delivery of
VOIP is baring fruit. Thanks again Peter.
John Scrivner
Peter R. wrote
This is the US Senator in my district in Illinois. It looks like he has
been reading my emails maybe. :-) At least he is getting parts of what I
have been saying.
Scriv
*DURBIN INTRODUCES BILL TO ENCOURAGE HIGH SPEED INTERNET ACCESS IN RURAL
AREAS *
Friday, August 4, 2006
[WASHINGTON, DC]
internet that EVERYONE can get) is going to create 61,000 jobs per
year for the next 20 years? If it will create jobs from people doing
more online, then it will decrease jobs from the brick and mortar
businesses going out of business. Am I missing something?
Travis
Microserv
John Scrivner wrote
Nice job on the website Matt Larsen. You rock man! Especially when you
are playing bass guitar!
:-)
Scriv
begin:vcard
fn:John Scrivner
n:Scrivner;John
org:Mt. Vernon. Net, Inc.
adr;dom:PO Box 1582;;1 Dr Park Road Suite H1;Mt. Vernon;Il;62864
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:President
Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message - From: John Scrivner
We are proud to announce that Alvarion has joined WISPA as our newest
vendor member. Alvarion has been key in the development of the
operations of many WISPs over the years. Alvarion is considered by many
to be the premier solution for WISP operations and we welcome them to
WISPA as a vendor
I never read the whole language of the bill. Does anyone have a link to
it? If that language exists then let me be the first to beat up on him
over this. Why is it we see press releases from politicians but rarely a
link to the language of their proposed legislation?
Scriv
Marlon K. Schafer
and
look forward to the work we will all do together to make this industry
better. WISPA has a stronger foundation now with you and Alvarion being
part of the effort and we appreciate your support very much.
Your friend,
John Scrivner
Patrick Leary wrote:
Thanks John, Rick, Matt, Marlon, et al
Try flipping polarities of one of the systems if possible. If they use
point to point yagis, as I have seen often, then setting the water
company to a different polarity to you should be a simple fix. How wide
(in megahertz) is the bandwidth of their system? How wide is yours? I
know Waverider
The answer is base station licenses for those who need / want spectrum
with interference protection and higher power. With this model you
could apply for a base station license (in other words 1 tower location
worth of spectrum in one geographic area), pay an annual fee and have
exclusive use
Thank you Matt. I am glad you took this one. I would have said the exact
same things you did if I was that good with words. I absolutely agree
with everything you said here.
:-)
Scriv
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Calm down kids!!
First of all to JohnnyO - you need to spend a lot more time
The rules state that any radio / antenna combination has to either be a
certified system or that a substitute antenna used would have to meet
the same specs as one used for certification in a system. Many think
that this means anything goes. The truth is that there are almost
certainly a good
or
used?
jack
John Scrivner wrote:
The rules state that any radio / antenna combination has to either be
a certified system or that a substitute antenna used would have to
meet the same specs as one used for certification in a system. Many
think that this means anything goes
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam
[480e].
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.232.162.254]
X-Declude-Spoolname:
I still think we need to keep this discussion going for a bit. I have a
question for you guys. Which do you think is better for all concerned.
Do you think we should portray a false sense of security and anonymity?
Do you think we should tell our customers, Hey do whatever you want
online,
The Military only for now. We will be able to under certain conditions
if the NTIA would ever release the reference standard for developing
testing of DFS and TPC for 5.4 to 5.7 GHz equipment certification. Many
hardware manufacturers have equipment ready once a testing standard is
released.
101 - 200 of 748 matches
Mail list logo