I've been using the latest nightly builds (not currently set up for SVN),
currently running 03/09/08. On both my test site and my main which is using
the latest 2.5, the upgrade fails with the following:
Downloading update from http://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/akismet.zip
Unpacking
I haven't been seeing any thumbnail images at all in the Manage/Media Library
since the following change was made on March 3rd, 2008:
http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/6074
Once this change was made, all the thumbnails in the above media Library (the
next nightly build) became much much larger
.
--
From: Andy Skelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:33 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Thumbnails in Manage/Media Library
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been seeing any thumbnail images
The classic blue looks a lot better with the new colors but how about trying
that light yellow color for the Right Now bar instead of that
orange/red(?) color.
I think it would blend in a lot better with the classic and light blue look
of the Dashboard.
Just a suggestion but that off red bar
--
From: Matt Mullenweg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:52 AM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: WP caching / performance
deliciousdays wrote:
no one has done any performance testing on 2.5?
Mullenweg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:00 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Re: WP caching / performance
Kirk M wrote:
Oh, BTW, I'm new here although I've posted a few times already. I should
have
done this ages ago. Really enjoying myself
like I've done below.
So no carriage return, hit the delete key!
HTH
Dawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk M
Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2008 7:44 a.m.
--
From: Matt Mullenweg [EMAIL
.
Does Microsoft Windows Live Mail have a reply option that formats like
my and Matt's emails?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of :
From: Matt Mullenweg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:00 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re
--
From: Andy Skelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:50 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Media Manager
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jim Stitzel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can upload an
--
From: John Blackbourn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:05 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] Plugin list visibility
+1
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Dave Allyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I'm also strongly in favour of putting the
upgrade stuff
into a plugin. It really doesn't have to be in the core
from a technical
point of view. And it's much too unstable due to the lot
of different
FTP servers and PHP setups out there. I know that it's
quite late in the
Mr. Awesome wrote:
Matt Mullenweg wrote:
Until we do the release, would it be possible to get this debug stuff
in core to help people out? This is the part of 2.5 I'm most worried
about.
I would go ahead and add the debug stuff to the core a while. There's
a some-what broad range of folks
Paul Gregory wrote:
Does it add the kludge if you upload a file that doesn't have a space in it
(and therefore wouldn't need renaming)?
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Image Name: insomnia 2.jpg
Uploaded image name changed to:
windowslivewritertesteye
Joseph Scott wrote
I found out that it was due to Windows Live Writer not recognizing
the Wordpress configuration itself. To solve it I updated to the
last revision at that time and then updated the weblog
configuration in WLW and things went back to normal. In short, it
was a combination of
Peter Westwood wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I have created some new views in trac which some of you may find useful
when looking for things to test or work on.
The new views are:
http://trac.wordpress.org/report/23
Release blockers - serious bugs on large new
In the Manage/MediaLibrary, when selecting a any link in the Media
column brings up the selected image's edit page as usual, Settings,
Plugins and Users disappears from the top right of page and the
following warning is displayed at the bottom of the page:
*
Warning*: Cannot modify header
Kristin Andrus Pishdadi wrote:
Strange,
I downloaded the theme you mentioned to test because it was not showing up.
It worked,
then i switched back to my theme and the page templates showed up.
It seems like it's not looking for them on the fly, but only when you
activate the theme, so if
Jennifer Hodgdon wrote:
I just tested it in a version of 2.5 I downloaded last Thursday, and
there is no problem. When I create a custom page template, it shows up
on the Page Edit screen. No cron jobs. No problem. No delay. No bug.
--Jennifer
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:24:40 -0400, Kirk M
Christopher Weddell wrote:
I think I spotted this in Beta 1, and took up challenge to join this
list with Matt's post today about RC1...
Using RC1 fresh install with no plugins - When I create a new Post or
Link, then assign it to a new category (created on the Post or Link
'page'), the Save
Lloyd Budd wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the post you linked. It seems that user has Mac. I get this error on
Windows. I also don't know what the Bad Behavior plugin is. I did goto the
website, but far as I know I don't have any
Using the Aksimet 2.1.4 plugin and by changing the plugin's version# to
2.1.0 I decided to run 5 concurrent upgrade attempts and record the
results. All plugins were deactivated. They were interesting to say the
least:
WP 2.5 RC1
Apache version2.2.8 (Unix)
PHP version5.2.5
MySQL
Ryan Boren wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Frank Helmschrott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/3/21, Ryan Boren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Background on the lost connection error.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/gone-away.html
ok - read over that. Though the server
Just a suggestion for the 'Manage/Media Library'. I've noticed that when
editing images in this version of the Media Library that after saving
the edits the browser returns to the same image editing page (Firefox
2). Now if that image resided on page 18 of the media library I now have
no way
I haven't had time to peruse around the latest tickets to see what was
you folks did with the plugin auto updater but whatever it was, it works
like a charm for me so far. In fact, when I did a test update of Aksimet
I happened to blink when I clicked on the auto upgrade link and it was
done
Burhan Khalid wrote:
Probably as a safeguard in those situations where rewrite support
isn't available.
___
I also see this same problem on my online test site and my main site
(r7502) where the new sample permalink suggestion also has index.php
Ryan Boren wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Burhan Khalid wrote:
Probably as a safeguard in those situations where rewrite support
isn't available.
___
I also see this same problem on my online
Ryan Boren wrote:
Does your host disable phpinfo()?
We'll have a fix shortly.
Ryan
No it doesn't in fact I was just looking at the read out. I don't mind
sharing at all. Here's the url if you want to take a look for yourself.
I can't say as I know a whole lot about what I'm looking at.
Ryan Boren wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Boren wrote:
Does your host disable phpinfo()?
We'll have a fix shortly.
No it doesn't in fact I was just looking at the read out. I don't mind
sharing at all. Here's the url if you want
Matt Mullenweg wrote:
sewpafly wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Daniel Schoonover
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd like to find out is how do you actually get this working?
Is this
something you have to edit the theme to implement? Would I still
need one
of the gravatar plugins
Mr. Awesome wrote:
Peter Westwood wrote:
This message is from the nonce check code but no nonces are used by
WordPress here.
The previous poster found it was caused by a contact form plugin.
Please try with all plugins disabled.
Just curious Westi, are there more plugins that use the nonces
Brent Logan wrote:
I get this behavior even when I deactivate all plugins.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Rick Beckman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Okay, I've solved my problem! The user-agent Shockwave Flash is in
Bad Behavior's blacklist, but that's the user-agent that the new
WordPress
The upgrade instructions [1] no longer recommend deleting the old set of
WordPress files.
So should the instructions be changed, or can old files be deleted as part
of the upgrade.php procedure?
[1] http://codex.wordpress.org/Upgrading_WordPress
MichaelH
Michael,
This is just my
SecFilterScanPOST Off
I'm not sure what it does, but it works.
-Brent
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Brent. I missed seeing that it was Rick Beckman that stated that
it was Bad Behavior and not you. :)
___
wp
Matt Mullenweg wrote:
Kirk M wrote:
I personally removed this next line as well. I never understood why
that was there in the first place (but that's me):
Wordpress,// malicious software (yup! It's there)
This is probably because they capitalized it wrong.
Matt,
I dare say you
Hey all,
We went over this before but it probably got lost in all the hard work
going on.
Under the Manage menu, when editing a tag or media, after the edit is
saved the UI should return the user to the page the tag or image was
listed on in the first place rather than page 1 in the case of
Rick Beckman wrote:
Kirk: Way ahead of you. I blogged the solution here:
http://rickbeckman.org/wordpress-25-bad-behavior-20x/
I'm not sure why Wordpress is listed, but it's conceivable a bot would be
masquerading as the software we all know and love. I left that line as it
didn't seem to be
Rick Beckman wrote:
Kirk: Replied to your comment on my blog. My post left a ping on the Bad
Behavior blog for the release of 2.0.15; hopefully, the author sees it.
--
Rick
Rick,
One can always hope. :)
___
wp-testers mailing list
Matt Mullenweg wrote:
Matt Moore wrote:
The new way is terrible. Every single post has a category or a tag,
and putting the input for them off the screen makes for too many
posts in 'uncategorized.'
I'm going to buy you one of those little new-fangled mouses with the
wheels in the middle.
Musing Minds wrote:
I use the default category of Musings so at least I don't end up with
uncategorized and musings fits with the title of my blog... I would like
the category near the top too, I was just coming up with a solution for
uncategorized which I personally dislike...
-Original
Michel van Helden wrote:
Is it true I can't put tags on pages??? In my opinion this should be a
choice of the author!!
Wait for the new version of Simple Tags to come out which
incorporates tags for pages. For the most part tags aren't normally used
for pages since in most cases at
Matt Mullenweg wrote:
We haven't talked about it much, but 2.5 introduces a much-improved
taxonomy system which should allow you to register new or existing
taxonomies (like tags, but also people, places, things) on to content
types including pages, posts, attachments, links...
I'm going to
MichaelH wrote:
Using 2.5-RC3 (R7561) on both a Xampp and a shared hosting environment.
For the life of me, I cannot get a post to Publish when I use the
Insert/edit embedded media tool on the visual tool bar. When I try to
Publish I get the Are you sure you want to navigate away from this
Just MichaelH wrote:
On 3/28/08, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just so you don't have to wait for an answer you need to include in your
info the OS and browser(s) you are using when this problem occurs. The
dev's will ask you this anyway. OS's and browser's can make a difference
in what
Musing Minds wrote:
I'm going to have to try to come up with a users' manual for new users /
upgraders.
I might want to collaborate with you on that or at least help out as I
can (Disabled vet prone to flare ups yadyada). I used to write tech
manuals and operating procedure way back when.
Annie wrote:
Thanks George.
What's WP 2.5 gold? Sorry if this is another daft question. ;-)
Hi Annie,
That just means that it's the final release. WP 2.5 is done finally.
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
To everyone,
Congratulations for a fantastic job! Personally, I have never seen so
much work and testing go into a new version of WordPress since I started
blogging. You folks have done an amazing job!
You may now pass out. :)
Go have a beer (or whatever).
Musing Minds wrote:
I'd be happy to work with you. I'm also a disabled vet prone to flare ups -
this week's been pretty bad pain wise... I've written quite a few
software/policy/procedure manuals for co-workers as well.
Sounds good. I already sent you a short email (using email addy from
George Pearce wrote:
I’ve just made a post with images in it, and the links didn’t go to it’s own
extra page, it went directly to the gif file where it is stored.
Is this a bug that anyone else has picked up, or it just me messing around
with it?
The links are working in the manage media
Martin Espericueta wrote:
When I run ANY auto plugin updater on 2.5, I get this:
Upgrade Plugin
Downloading update from
http://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/all-in-one-seo-pack.zip
Unpacking the update
*Fatal error*: Cannot
After upgrading to WP 2.5.1 I noticed that although I can drag an
existing sidebar widget up and down the column of existing (existing
meaning already assigned to my sidebar) widgets and the other widgets
make room properly, once I drop the widget I'm dragging it ends up on
some other random
Musing Minds wrote:
Eww, that's ugly. I can get them into the order I want with some
nudging, but the experience is definitely poor. Working on it.
I can confirm this happening as well. Used Firefox browser while doing
the widget moving, but yeah, I got the same thing happening on
Matt Moore wrote:
To change the db_version you browse to
http://example.com/wp-admin/options.php, don't change it in the actual
file on the server.
Well what do you know...massive brain flatulence! I forgot all about
this. I must be getting old I think or maybe I don't.
Thanks for the
Ryan Boren wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After upgrading to WP 2.5.1 I noticed that although I can drag an existing
sidebar widget up and down the column of existing (existing meaning
already assigned to my sidebar) widgets and the other widgets
DD32 wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:51:34 +1000, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Moore wrote:
That fixed it, thank you.
DD32 wrote:
I've re-opened the bug with a patch
http://trac.wordpress.org/attachment/ticket/6460/6460.diff
If you remove the slashes, and then force a DB Upgrade
Mr. Awesome wrote:
For some reason, even after having the latest copy of the
wp-contactform... it's affecting the image uploader? I have to disable
the plugin in-order for it to work. What's the BEST contact form
plugin out there? Most secure and easily customizable?
Try this one. I've been
I was searching through the Media Library (both) for a certain image
that was uploaded in December, 2006 and I discovered that the Media
Library's date records do not extend past January, 2007. All media
before that date are not listed in the Media Library(s). This has to be
a bug since I
Andy Skelton wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was searching through the Media Library (both) for a certain image that
was uploaded in December, 2006 and I discovered that the Media Library's
date records do not extend past January, 2007. All media
Now this is a real slick feature and one I know I'd definitely use when
I wasn't posting from an local app. However, I do have to echo Will
Garcia's concern about the database and how much extra pounding it might
take with this new feature. Do you have an idea on how much extra load
it might
when using the plugin via your Admin. Just
a late night thought.
spencerp wrote:
Kirk M wrote:
However, I do have to echo Will Garcia's concern about the database
and how much extra pounding it might take with this new feature. Do
you have an idea on how much extra load it might be on the DB
You're welcome. :D
spencerp wrote:
Kirk M wrote:
Have you tried the WordPress Database Backup plugin for downloading
your database instead of going through PhpMyAdmin?
That seems to work so much better! Thanks again for reminding me about
that Kirk
I'll add a vote for both selective deleting of revisions and an option
for specifying a limit to the number of revisions stored.
Excellent new feature folks!
ProDevStudio wrote:
Hi Everyone,
First of all BIG thumbs up to everyone developing core WordPress.
Like Peter Westwood said I would
This usually means that WordPress is encountering an error in
finding the correct theme when someone(s) attempts to access
your site. In this case WordPress will revert to the Default
theme rather than offering nothing at all to the visitor.
I've encountered this same type of problem in the
So it's going from Crazyhorse's to teaching Yiddish already? So I need
to come to WordPress to learn this? Oy, whaddah bunch of schlameil's.
Nice schlameil's maybe, talented schlameil's maybe but may I suggest you
get back to some serious putzin' around? :D
Doug Stewart wrote:
On Mon, Jun
Hi all,
I don't know if this has been discussed here before (probably has, I may
have missed it) but before the Admin UI makeover, we had a handy place
to put both unused and previously used (disabled) widgets which made it
very convenient if we chose to reuse a previously setup widget again,
something here? :D
Stefano Aglietti wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:36:42 -0400, Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know if this has been discussed here before (probably has, I may
have missed it) but before the Admin UI makeover, we had a handy place
to put both unused
Do my eyes deceive me or am I seeing a due date of July 7th for the
release of 2.6 with a fall back for July 14? Any reason for the
releasing a month early? I've barely setup my test sites figuring I had
a month to go yet. ;)
___
wp-testers mailing
Currently running 5.2.6 on Bluehost although they still offer the choice
between PHP 4.2.8 and 5.2.6 on some of their older servers that had to
be upgrade to PHP 5. Their newer ones run just PHP 5.2.6. I think they
plan on pulling PHP 4 altogether the same time as the end of life is
Hmmm, I just checked the feeds from both my sites, one running 2.5.1 and
the other running 2.6 beta 1 (trunk) and the dates are correct. I viewed
both the raw feeds (via Page info in Firefox 3.0) and the burned
versions. Wondering why some folks are getting this problem and not
others. A
:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Kirk M wrote:
Hmmm, I just checked the feeds from both my sites, one running 2.5.1
and the other running 2.6 beta 1 (trunk) and the dates are correct. I
viewed both the raw feeds (via Page info in Firefox 3.0) and the
burned versions. Wondering why some folks
Ah, okay. I saw that myself except that the comment didn't show at all
unless I refreshed the page. Same thing most likely just manifested
itself a bit differently. Thanks for the info!
Gene Steinberg wrote:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Kirk M wrote:
Gene,
What problems are you seeing
Hey Daniel,
Here's something; when I check your feeds using Firefox 3's Page Info
and the via the Feeds icon in the Location Bar the RSS .092 feed
doesn't show any dates at all and the Atom 0.3 feed shows the
_correct_ dates. However, clicking on the Feed icon on the site itself
shows
Aaron,
You can always find the latest Trunk build here:
http://trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk
Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click the Zip Archive link
under Download in other formats and you'll get a Zip file of the
latest build.
Aaron Law wrote:
Dear all,
The nightly
Hi Nick,
I've been checking out the functions of the Simple Tags plugin that I
have installed in two WP 2.6 beta 1 sites and for the life of me I can't
find a problem, the plugin seems to be working fine. Could you let me
know what you're seeing so I know what I'm looking for?
Nick Bohle
Hey Nick,
I took a quick look and found that Simple Tags version 1.5.3 is an old
version. The current version is 1.5.7 (I think it was updated 1 to 2
weeks ago) which works with both 2.5 and 2.6 (both versions included in
simple-tags.php). Not to sure why your Plugins page isn't showing that
In using the latest 2.6 trunk build (r8265) I noticed a rogue search box
on Admin pages that do not normally have a search function such as
Dashboard, Import, Export etc. This search box which just has the word
Search displayed by the search field covers the uppermost right hand
side of the
[spoken with a tremendous amount of irony]
**
I've been testing the first release candidate of Firefox 3.0.1 and guess
what?
Google Gears is not compatible with 3.0.1.
Now guess when 3.0.1 is tentatively scheduled to be released?
How
at 8:13 PM, Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now guess which browser is used by nearly all WordPress users in order to
administer their WP install?
Firefox...
That seems like a bit of a stretch...
Have you made Google aware of this issue
/thread/4db2887cb33a29de
In short: The next version of Gears will support FF 3.0.*, They werent
planning on releasing the next version so soon, but they're going to
push for an updated version to be available.
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:27:22 +1000, Kirk M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my next
mac though.
2008/7/12 Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DD32,
Thanks for the info, saves me the trouble. It simply looks like Google
wasn't expecting a maintenance release out so soon after FX 3.0 hit the
streets. By the way, 2.6's Gears support worked like a charm.
DD32 wrote:
See:
http
compatible and then just
doesn't work. People will just have to be patient.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my next stop, Matt but it's getting near midnight where I am so it
will have to wait till morning. I need to be coherent. I might hear back
from
Upon seeing your comment here I updated my locally installed WordPress
Sandbox to 2.6, upgraded the DB when prompted and the login continued
with no problems, logged in fine. The only things I may have done
differently is that I never overwrite directories and files during an
upgrade with the
This sounds like a needed feature. The option to disable the update
notifications for any single plugin or plugins via the Admin's Plugin
page but definitely not a global option say somewhere in Settings. The
user should not be able to turn it off entirely, it's there for a good
Ghaith,
I know this is sounds like a stupid check but make sure the visual
editor is enabled via the appropriate check box in your User account
(the top section).
I upgraded yesterday and performed upgrades for several friends of mine
and they haven't experienced this problem. For whatever
PROTECTED]
To: Matt Mullenweg
ReplyTo: Matt Mullenweg
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] 2.6 Admin running slower than previous versions?
Sent: Jul 30, 2008 11:14 AM
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:08:22 +0200, Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone had a problem with the 2.6 Admin running slower
Oh good (or not good as the case may be), then it's just not me and a
few others seeing this.And I'm running on Bluehost which is usually up
to speed since they did a massive upgrade to their servers earlier this
years. Also running SuperCache since it came out by the way. Same thing
as you
I had the same idea. I'll upgrade the local install first and then one
of my online sites. Heck, I can fix anything that might break :D.
Matt wrote:
Trying checking out the latest 2.6 branch (that'll become 2.6.1), to
see if that fixes your problem.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Kirk M
version any day. I'll wait till the morning and check again but
it looks good so far. A pronounced difference for the better.
Matt wrote:
Trying checking out the latest 2.6 branch (that'll become 2.6.1), to
see if that fixes your problem.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Kirk M[EMAIL
. Re: Question : How to have N blogs in one wordpress
(Stephen Rider)
2. Re: wp-testers Digest, Vol 41, Issue 36 (Christopher Raymond)
3. Re: A blog in two languages? (Pixline ? Paolo Tresso)
4. 2.6 Admin running slower than previous versions? (Kirk M)
5. Re: 2.6 Admin running
Thanks Creamers.
Creamers - (Shamu3) wrote:
He told me plug ins
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
~Creamers
-Original Message-
From: Kirk M[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:36:05
To:wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WP 2.6 running slow
No, I'm afraid not nor did it help on one of my clients sites but thanks
for info anyway. After testing thoroughly, I updated both my sites to an
early branch of 2.6.1 (r8511) a few days ago which apparently fixed the
problem and I have recently upgraded again to 2.6.1 r8524. For all
intensive
://rickbeckman.org/
http://fellowship-hall.com/
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Gene Steinberg[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 2, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Kirk M wrote:
Another thing worth noting was that deactivating all the plugins sped
things up quite a bit with 2.6 however, doing the same
In a more personal test case, without WP SpamFree activated, I have to
sift through 200-300 spamments a day (all legit spams, rarely a false
positive). With WP SpamFree activated Akismet may actually pick up one
or two spamments every 4 to 5 days. Big difference there in my time
spent rolling
Just personal preference here, Gene. Besides, how many WP folks have a
dedicated box (don't I wish) vs the old shared hosting gig?
Here's to peace then,
Kirk M
Gene Steinberg wrote:
I don't worry about resource issues with a dedicated box. But I still
feel that a single solution ought
So this is bad? It just means are working smoothly for once so siddown,
relax and have a beer. ;)
Timothy Howard wrote:
IMO: Its just been a quiet month, and wondering if the list is still
working is the first topic :)
It's looking like that =)
On 13/08/2008, at 7:21 PM, DD32 wrote:
I dont
I'll add my vote for that one. Nice mod.
Jonathan Gabor wrote:
Hey Ronan,
I actually think this sounds like a really good idea! I hope it gets
integrated.
/Jonathan
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Capripot[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I've opened a ticket on the trac, but i
You need to post a comment to Scott's post about the release of
Permalink Redirect 2.0. He's always good with giving advice and
solving problems like this. Just make sure you're specific about your
details of your server and how you changed your permalink structure.
Brilliant minds and all that.
Peter Westwood wrote:
Kirk M wrote:
Trac Roadmap is still showing 2.6.1 with no date set, 62 closed
tickets and 20 still Active. 2.6.2 shows 0 closed tickets and 1
active. Shouldn't 2.6.1's active tickets be ported over to 2.6.2 and
2.6.1 deleted off the roadmap
Strange that you're getting that. I loaded up 2.7 r8780 into my local
sandbox (XAMPP for Windows, PHP 5.2.6) this morning with no problems
although I have no plugins installed or activated. I have tried several
different themes with it though with no problems. Haven't done any
online testing
Oh, now there's a rare occurrence. ;D
Thanks for info, Francesc. Gave me a chance to rib my betters.
Francesc Hervada-Sala wrote:
Hello,
I do not know if this is now worth changig it, but the readme deployed with
release 2.6.2 has the old version number 2.6.1 twice inside.
Regards,
Francesc
Understanding that I've read and reread your message here to make sure
that I understand everything you've done so far, it sounds like the one
of the main directories that WordPress is installed into may have become
write protected. Why this would happen could be many reasons/quirks or
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
