At 05:14 on Tuesday, 16 Nov 2004, Nick Lo wrote:
By the way it can be solved by adding padding to it's container:
div#content { margin-left: 190px; margin-right: 200px; padding-top: 3pt;
}
However I'm still not clear why.
I'd imagine this might explain:
At 03:52 on Tuesday, 16 Nov 2004, Chris Stratford wrote:
Wow, that is something I didn't realise existed!
That is great!
Thanks a lot Natalie!
- Chris Stratford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Natalie Buxton wrote:
Armit
You can force a page break before an image using css.
page-break-before: always;
Hi Guys,
This is my first post here, i am gradually getting into web standards
and CSS based design. But i am having problems with a simple layout at
the moment.
If you take a look at this page:
http://www.burninthespotlight.com/topics/page1810666.html
(this page has no design yet, i want it to
Hey Joey,
On first inspection I think your problem is setting the width to 100%. The
three overflowing divs within the ctpost have settings that have the width of
the parent element and are then shifted 175px to the right, hence the overflow.
Try just using margin-left: 175px (no need for the
It wont do that unless he puts the CSS in the img {}. You can do it
inline for a specific image, paragraph, whatever, or in a span
specifically for that purpose.
You dont have to specify it globally for all images.
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:29:35 -, Tony Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Damian,
Thanks for that info, i have ammended my CSS file as you said, and voila!
http://www.burninthespotlight.com/topics/page1810666.html (Page with
problem)
http://www.burninthespotlight.com/styles/layout3.css (CSS File)
It fixed some of the overflowing, only problem i have now, is that
At 11:30 on Tuesday, 16 Nov 2004, Natalie Buxton wrote:
It wont do that unless he puts the CSS in the img {}. You can do it
inline for a specific image, paragraph, whatever, or in a span
specifically for that purpose.
You dont have to specify it globally for all images.
sure, but then you have to
Hi All,
I joined this group a couple of weeks ago and already have learnt lots of
stuff. But, like all new folk to xhtml/css, I'm struggling to accept some of
it. I've used CSS for a couple of years now, but only recently have moved
to full CSS (no tables etc). The thing that worries me most is
From: designer
Clearly, the use of ems is just a nightmare, esp when you have several
images and have to guess what the em dimensions are,
Images should still be specified in pixels, imho, as pixel size is an
intrinsic property of raster images. I'd posit (but admittedly it's my
personal
The best way to work around this is to make a fluid layout.
Somethings will always not fit with your design.
But the user would be more than used to websites breaking if they
constantly need massive text on screen...
designer wrote:
Hi All,
I joined this group a couple of weeks ago and already
designer wrote:
I joined this group a couple of weeks ago and already have learnt lots of
stuff. But, like all new folk to xhtml/css, I'm struggling to accept some of
it. I've used CSS for a couple of years now, but only recently have moved
to full CSS (no tables etc). The thing that
Hi,
I'm having rendering issues with the navigation at the following:
http://working.ckimedia.com/index.php
in firefox 1.0 MAC OS 10.2.8 all is well, in safari 1.0.3 the padding
on the bottom border is inside the tabs. Would some one assist?
___
Knowing is not
I'm producing a small video, and per request, he wants it in wmv format.
What's the extent of apple/linux guys being able to view this format?
are their codecs for non-windows systems?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Original Message
Subject: [WSG] video standards?
From:brian cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Tue, November 16, 2004 11:40 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
VLC http://www.videolan.org/vlc/ is a player that handles (most) wmv
movies and is available for a large number of platforms.
I'm not a video expert, but heres my understanding of the market:
1. wmv files are a MS propriety implementation of MPEG4.
2. Generally the files are considerably smaller
--- brian cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm producing a small video, and per request, he wants it in wmv
format.
What's the extent of apple/linux guys being able to view this format?
are their codecs for non-windows systems?
There actually is a version of Windows Media Player
Link?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:20:04 +1100, James Gollan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a small issue on the home page with the hover state in firefox/win.
On the link to the help page the hover state underline is pushing the
content box and footer down by 1px creates a little
I dont know a whole lot about video stuff but I agree with Terrence
and though Windows media is available for Mac OS, very few would
install in let alone use it! .mov is a better way of going about
surely.
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:28:34 -0800 (PST), Edwin Horneij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
Hi,
If the client is at all flexible, I would suggest looking into .flv.
The flash video fromat is taking off like wildfire, and with the flash
player penetration, it is a stable solution:
http://www.flashstreamworks.com/
C
On Tuesday, November 16, 2004, at 09:40 AM, brian cummiskey wrote:
I'm
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
If the client is at all flexible, I would suggest looking into .flv. The
flash video fromat is taking off like wildfire, and with the flash
player penetration, it is a stable solution:
http://www.flashstreamworks.com/
Looks great- But i don't have flash, nor have even
Within QuickTime there are are many codecs available, including AVI, MPEGs 1
2 and MPEG 4, etc. This is what I've found (the hard way) when dealing
with video:
AVI is an old MS codec that they haven't supported in years that thrill
Windows users because of the small file sizes. IMHO, the
.mov is QuickTime and Windows users are as likely to download and install that
as Mac users are to install Windows Media Player. And even if you use Windows
Media Player, the issue of codecs remains - not all codecs are available for
the Mac and some do not play at all or play the video with no
Brian,
.mov is both platforms (don't know about Linux, but don't doubt it's
there too) more so than .wmv. And iMovie is cheap and also a piece of
cake to use, if not more so. ;)
Also, to Chris's point, there are more people with Flash than
anything else (both platforms included, again not up
Well,
I guess that was the end.
C
On Tuesday, November 16, 2004, at 01:40 PM, brian cummiskey wrote:
Looks great- But i don't have flash, nor have even messed around with
it (frankly, i can't stand flash websites),
___
Knowing is not enough, you must apply;
willing is
Our new site uses fieldsets on all of our forms and I've always had a bit of a
struggle with the lengths of legends.
I've tried adding a width to the legend but the browsers seem to ignore the
width declaration.
I'm especially having problems with IE gasp/ which is forcing the div with
the
Hi Ted,
Just a quick comment on legends that are too long.
Modern screen readers like JAWS voice the legend before every form input
label within a fieldset. As a result, some screen reader users might get a
bit annoyed with your form (and the site) if, for example, they have to hear
a whole lot
So, I've been sitting here blaming my legend for the page falling apart and I
think I need to apologize.
I'm sorry legend, I may have been wrong. Do you forgive me?
Well, that makes me feel better, but it doesn't solve my problem. I threw some
borders on my divs and elements and
Hi WSG members,
I've been working on my first -total webstandards- project for some
time now. It's enteing it's final
stage, now only content has to be applied to it.
Would you be so kind to do a little site-check to see if it all works
out ?
I've tested it so far in
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:51:58 -, designer wrote:
- Opera has a beautiful zoom feature which simply magnifies
everything and keeps the design intact, so isn't that the way
browsers should be going, instead of just acting on the text?
I love Opera, but it's not perfect. If you have a layer
Hugh Todd wrote:
I had a listen Frank Casanova's talk, given recently at the CTIA
Wireless IT Entertainment Conference in San Francisco (
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/ctia2004/ ), and was impressed by
the commitment Apple appears to be showing to open standards in video
and audio media.
Try z-index:
http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_pos_z-index.asp
Damian
I am trying to get the graphic logo (CRF logo above) in my header to be
positioned behind the grapic and between (CRF) and This is some text for
testing purposes. Does anyone have any ideas? Thank you.
HTML:
Hi,
excepting the font size in the content,
everything seems to be ok, at least with Opera 6.05 PC,
an old version that always show something different and
i usually use to the final standard check.
The look is very cool.
Manara
Citando Kristof Rutten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi WSG members,
Kristof Rutten wrote:
Hi WSG members,
I've been working on my first -total webstandards- project for some
time now. It's enteing it's final
stage, now only content has to be applied to it.
Would you be so kind to do a little site-check to see if it all works
out ?
I've tested it so far in
Hey Kristof,
First up, it's looking clean, smart and fresh. Just some points that
immediately spring to mind:
- Nav: hard to read white text on light blue button background
- List of links on the left: on IE/Win the buttons don't behave as you'd
expect unless you hover over the text
Matthew,
You make some good points. However:
1) The MPEG-LA (Licensing Authority), as far as I know, is only the
legal clearing-house for the MPEG-4 technology, which has been
developed at the behest of a large number of the manufacturers and
developers in the video market. No one person or
Kristof Rutten wrote:
http://www.sportopolis.be
I've tested it so far in Safari/Firefox/Camino/Firefox on PC/IE on PC
and I see no problems. But hey ;)
Find a UXGA 15 laptop, then show it to your grandparents using IE. They
probably won't be able to read any of your content or links
Hrmm, my Firefox default seting looks just fine to me. Felix, is yours
set to abnormally low values?
Francesco
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:12:58 -0500, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Find a UXGA 15 laptop, then show it to your grandparents using IE. They
probably won't be able to read any
Like many Internet technologies it can be difficult, if not impossible, to
go to a standard, particularly video which has matured enormously.
If you have the resources to offer video in multiple formats (Real, Windows
Media, Flash, etc) good for you (and nothing derogatory meant by that).
I
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:33, Damian Sweeney wrote:
.mov is generally not available for Linux (with the exception of
using Codeweavers wine ($$) to run Quicktime for Windows in Linux).
The Linux mplayer plugin for Firefox [1] will play pretty much
everything I have tested, though some of the M$
Peter,
I think Macromedia's Flash product has a lot going for it,
particularly in
the player penetration stakes. Anything that can make both
publishing and
viewing video content on the web can only be a good thing (unless it
is more
pr0n).
A good argument, though not a standards-based one!
But
ok maybe its just the way u said this but its gotta be the dumbest thing i have
ever read
[quote]I imagined MacroMedia would not turn
out a template that did not work in all browsers on all platforms.[/quote]
i mean come on
if it makes u feel better to pass some blame then blame who it is
Francesco wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:12:58 -0500, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[about http://www.sportopolis.be]
Find a UXGA 15 laptop, then show it to your grandparents using IE. They
probably won't be able to read any of your content or links without a
cumbersome magnifier.
42 matches
Mail list logo
