From: James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the functions of this list and group is to implement best
practices
using W3C standards based development. These conditionals you talk
about are
a Microsoft addition to workaround bugs in their software (what
happened to
fixing the bugs?), like
James,
I can see where you're coming from, and I'm all for the programming
purity you're advocating, but I want to stick my hand up in support of
Thierry's position here. In fact, I was in the process of assembling
all these filters myself when he posted his link to this list, so I'm
Thierry
In what arcane alternate reality do comments drive code? You are still
talking about a hack. How is using this different to parsing a User
Agent string? different method but same result.
Adding to this, it's not a valid way of writing your code, as
mentioned on another thread. The
Hi James,
Adding to this, it's not a valid way of writing your code, as
mentioned on another thread.
AFAIK, the discussion you're referring to didn't take us anywhere. It has
been said that Michael Landis summed up the thread pretty well saying:
I think we're getting very close to a debate on
On 10/9/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's totally irrelevant. If 2 days ago you knew your article was flawed
then why posting a link to it?
I only mentioned it because it was published exactly 365 days earlier
on a very similar topic (linking CSS to html files). I was amused
Thierry -
Umm... the first result:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=conditional+comments+are+evilbtnG=Searchmeta=
is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Apr/0027.html
One of the functions of this list and group is to implement best
practices using W3C standards based
James Ellis wrote:
One of the functions of this list and group is to implement best
practices using W3C standards based development. These conditionals you
talk about are a Microsoft addition to workaround bugs in their software
(what happened to fixing the bugs?), like coloured scrollbars
James,
One of the functions of this list and group is to implement best
practices
using W3C standards based development. These conditionals you talk
about are
a Microsoft addition to workaround bugs in their software (what
happened to
fixing the bugs?), like coloured scrollbars and DirectX
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
On 10/8/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make sense at all. Or is there an
important detail I'm missing? ;)
Yes, you're missing the part where this was written over 12 months ago
That's totally irrelevant. If 2 days ago you
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I have yet to see a good browser with solid CSS support, so
solid doesn't mean flawless. I am not that naive ;)
I don't think we can say completely no to CSS hacks anytime soon. But
of course; this depends on how we define hacks, so it's well worth
trying.
That
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
That sentance leaves too many doors opened so I won't go there, but
FWIW, I don't agree with you ;)
Should there be a 'dis' in that sentence? Or? :-)
;)
I like the chaotic mess we get when all doors are opened. Leaves me
with a lot more options.
I know. That's
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
IMO, hasLayout is a tough concept to grab. I think experiencing the
result of the implementation of this fix is enough feedback for most
people. It works or it doesn't.
You sure got that wrong. Please, don't repeat it to others - they may
believe you.
AFAIK,
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
On 10/7/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
Sure, but I'm in a hurry so please excuse me if I'm a bit short with
my reponse :)
media=all is a
On 10/8/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make sense at all. Or is there an important
detail I'm missing? ;)
Yes, you're missing the part where this was written over 12 months ago
by someone who had only built 3 sites and wanted to try and help other
Hi Andrew,
With due respect for your article (everything gets outdated status
pretty fast on the Internet... no) you was the one brought your article
into the debate ;)
Peace
Kim
It's all well and good to say that's so outdated, what the heck were
you thinking and you're right -- I don't
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
The idea is good, but it's a bit incomplete at the moment.
I have yet to see a good browser with solid CSS support, so I don't
think we can say completely no
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
On 10/7/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/branching.asp
Sure, but I'm in a hurry so please excuse me if I'm a bit short with
my reponse :)
Congratulations! Now your file is ready for
: Andrew Krespanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 7, 2005 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Say no to CSS hacks with branching techniques
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
On 10/7/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate your feedback so I can improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
