Call me fastidious, but I like all my file types to be the same in one
folder. That is, the styles folder should have only stylesheets, images
should have only images.
When it comes to Flash I tend to put these in a folder called media for
some reason
R :o)
--Original Message --
One
Sorry Vlad - Ithink I'm with Lachlan on this one...
Docs can be edited or re-written but if they're obsolete, you don't need to
delete them - just don't link to them...
If there's a conflict in nomenclature, like having a file called logo.gif
for a company logo and you've a logo for one of
Message -
From: Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: Website Directory Structure - Best Practice
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Sorry Vlad - Ithink I'm with Lachlan on this one...
Docs can be edited or re-written
Hi Vlad,
In the case of the products - why not simply have a page saying Product X is
no longer available. Remember I'm not talking about document santity where
you're not aloud to touch it, but rather the idea that you don't need to
delete files - which also avoids 404 errors...
Branding -
I think this article pretty much cover it and seems to be the 'best
practice' method.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/urls/
This accommodates eliminating the extension - which would please our
Grandaddy Tim Berners-Lee
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
as well as avoids dumping
Ummm, mickey - just spotted the fact that you have multiple identical
IDs
How does this work? Certainly won't validate..
R :o)
- Original Message -
From: Micky Mourelo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG]
venerable peers :o)
Now just have to figure out a way to style the legend properly.
Cheers,
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Micky Mourelo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantic Form - Person's Title
To Richard
Here's a potentially naive response ... does it matter?
As long as the (x)html is semantically marked up, does the rationale behind
your css code make a difference (taking into account the fact that it should
look the same on all browsers)?
The ONLY function of css is the control of the
This may sound silly but what about the tabindex attribute?
AFAIK it's still part of the standard and should do what you're after...
R :o)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hey John,
I think you're right on both counts...
Yes, in order for this to be effective the more professionals who
contribute, the better it will be.
And yes, absolutely, it's not about stating this is the ONLY way you can do
this but presenting a set of choices.
I look forward to seeing the
Hey John :o)
Martijn van Welie's been hacking away at something like this for a bit -
check it out :o)
http://www.welie.com/patterns/index.html
R
- Original Message -
From: John Allsopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:34 PM
Actually, it would be great if we could have something like this which would
form a 'toolkit' of sorts where we can take 'developer-authorised' code
snippets and put them in our pages. Such as finally having a collection of
code so we don't have to ask: What's the most semantic and valid way of
I don't know, Sam...
I mean, we're not forcing someone to use these patterns. But let's face it,
they're patterns because lots of people use them.
For example:
previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next
look familiar?
Google and almost every multi-page set of results uses this. I'd call it a
In answer to your actual original question...
Wouldn't it just involve setting the paragraphs container to
padding: 0 3em; text-align: center;
and then in the paragraph have something like
text-align: justify;
where 3em is the space on either side of the para to make it look centred.
style
Patrick's got a good point ... but isn't this conversation just about at its
end?
We seem to have two camps: those for and those against.
How much more do we need to talk about this stuff???
R
- Original Message -
From: Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
There's also the idea that legal documents are often split into sections
which continue numbering but are infact separate documents (addendums,
etc...) .
At the moment, legal docs can't be semantically marked-up (at least in OZ)
because:
1. any electonic version of a legal document MUST
This seems to be a great way to illustrate one of the key points of the
whole standards compliant, semantic web concept.
Basically,
XHTML - Content (what it says)
CSS - Form (what it looks like)
JavaScript/DOM - Behaviour (what happens when I do this ...)
The Fisheye example looks
Actually James, I think this is
more a Usability concern rather than an Accessibility concern.
Whatyou might say instead is:
"I can't view the site on my
browser and even if I could, the text is samll and I can't change
it!"
Or
"Why does this site tell me I need
to have _javascript_
I think another part of this is also the fact that web development is moving
towards being a more respected industry and escaping the 'techno-mysticism'
that surrounded it in the late 90s when we were all meant to be snowboarding
designers or propellorheads.
Having standards (and using them!)
Also - the Nokia browser on my phone doesn't support JavaScript. And even if
it did, where the heck would I change the settings?
Device independence is a big part of Accessibility, IMHO.
R :o)
- Original Message -
From: Donna Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
I think it's important to NOT expect users to know how to do this or even be
vaguely technically literate.
Doctors, for example, shouldn't have to be IT experts. They fix people not
machines. It's simply not their job or responsibility to be forced to learn
the HUGE amount of stuff that as
Good point, Andy.
However, I think there actually *is* a benchmark we can use as a guide to
work from in terms of the user's technical ability. I'd start by looking at
'default behaviour'. The ability to operate a machine/software using ONLY
its default settings.
For the web, this would be
This sounds like it's going to turn into another let's all figure out how
to use the address tag thing so let me pre-empt that.
I think the bigger question is can someone proivde an example of when best
to use the br / tag in general?
What type of content semantically requires a line break.
OK so someone pointed out that pre would be better for poetry and I agree
but with some reservations.
pre does a nice job of handling the visual side of things but from a
screen reader's point of view, how do they handle a line break through pre
as opposed to br /. Do they pause or say new
However, there is an argument that
has the logo in the CSS particularly for branding purposes. Hear me
out...
You put the logo in the CSS. Nice
and big and branded etc...
Then you make a special logo for,
oh I don't know, mobile devices. Small, crisp, pixel perfect.
Now your users can see
Subject: *SPAM* Re: [WSG] Placement of company logo
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Doing it this way IS good branding.
It's also about controlling HOW you want your logo to appear in
certain context. Anyone that's written a Corporate Style Guide will
know what I'm talking about...
Good point
: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:58 PM
Subject: *SPAM* Re: [WSG] Placement of company logo
Richard Czeiger wrote:
That way you don't get clear.gif going in your otherwise
semantically nice mark up :o)
... but that way you don't get a clickable logo ;)
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
I dont' know how it works in the big leagues over at the W3C but I imagine
that there's a fair amount of discussion internally about every single
little bit they put into their specs.
Also, I have a stong feeling that our little mailing list here actually is a
significant player into what the
wouldn't make sense
R
- Original Message -
From: Christian Montoya
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Avoiding the evil br
On 10/9/05, Richard
Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK
so someone pointed out that pre would
I'd have to agree with Andreas here.
Wile for Ranking purposes they're not terribly important, at least
Description is still sometimes used by Search Engines.
Plus there's the added notion that Meta Tags *in and of themselves* are a
good thing to put in a page (as any librarian will tell
Nice attempt Russ, but I'm with
Andreas here.
If the the link takes you to a
location whose purpose is to execute a function (apart from reading/viewing)
then why not state that.
I've exempted reading and viewing
as they're pretty much what you *have* to do on the web for every page - so
Hey Damian,
Very valid point! It's not too difficult to turn a verb into an adjective.
Somehow, though, reading your example I get the feeling that it's a very
passive voice to read in.
It almost *feels* like:
Here's the Registration Form (which by the way you can also fill in).
What else
Wasn't this question asked not long ago?
Shouldn't people at least try to check the archives first?
R
- Original Message -
From: Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 5:27 PM
Subject: [WSG] teaching students developing to web
Umm, sorry Bert, Kenny's right. Totally unpredictable behavious of the
object tag in IE6.
Sometimes won't load, sometimes throws up a script error, and any JavaScript
that I have can't talk to it.
:o(
Any other suggestions?
R
- Original Message -
From: Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone remember on this list an example someone put together of an
XHTML/CSS page feature a picture of a mobile phone where you could 'click'
on the buttons (which were positioned via CSS)?
Tried looking in the archive, but can't find it.
Cheers :o)
Richard
I think it's also important to bare in mind that there might be very good
reasons for putting a ul inside a div. The most obvious one I can think
of is the need for two background images. I think once the next standard
incorporates this and browsers support it, there will be even less need for
Maybe a lack of coffee but in XHTML 1.0 Strict, what is there that replaces
iframes?
I vaguely remember once being able to add the SRC attribute to a
div but that's not up to spec.
What's out there thatdisplays the contents of a URIand
validates?
Cheers :o)
Richard
Ah - ok ... now i get it .. sorry ... firday ... going home now :o)
r
- Original Message -
From: Peter Williams
I think confused. I took this to mean that:
- you create a standards compliant site
- a visitor with an older browser visits and sees mush
- a page explains why the page
Hi all :o)
Have a client whose text size in IE is set to Largest (like my Dad).
Just wondering if anyone knows of a resource out there that maps out the
percentage of users that:
a) know about View Text Size, and
b) actually change it and if so, to what?
Any help would be good and, I
Thanks Donna - Nice to hear from a
usability professional.
I guess this raises the question:
If we're all going hell-for-leather making fluid siteswith relative fonts
for increased usability / accessibility and no one knows about it or how to use
it, then:
a) Is it worth the effort?
Hi Terrence,
I agree that its not our domain,
but I don't think that makes us completely free of responsibility.
Additionally, if no one knows about
it - why bother. Shouldn't I just go back to to pixel-perfect font
control.
Yourphrase 'removing barriers
to content' got me thinking... The
Hey Donna :o)
Geeky, huh? Very well.
The Accessibility Statement is
fairly generic (an example is here www.aidgc.com.au/accessibility.html ) and is based on an amanlgamation of various
guru's and government's access pages. So the geek factor is probably high, but
for politeness I'll refer
I like the idea of a 'friendly' accessibility page. ve got these 'footer
pages' that I basically copy across sites instead of thinkingn up new
content all the time. My only concern in rewriting this is that some of my
clients prefer very formal language for their sites.
Maybe its a case of
Here that, Donna?
You've been nominated!
I await your masterwork
:oP
R
- Original Message -
From: "Terrence
Wood" I'd
take up Donna's offer to rewrite it for you =)
I thinkeveryone's put forward
excellent arguments, thus far.
It's important to remember that a
lot of the time the 'why are we doing this' questions get asked because we're
after a reasonable justification for both ourselves and our clients. I don't
think it's enough to do something purely
Ummm, if you were a developer would you put a link on your non-standards
compliant site pointing to a page that tells the user why your site is
bad
R (either confused or not catching sarcasm on a Friday afternoon)
- Original Message -
From: Scott Swabey - Lafinboy Productions
I don't know, Lea...
Perhaps there should be two lists - one for discussing
standards/accessibility/best practice and one for how do I fix my
float/site check please.
Personally, the latter tends to just fill up my Inbox, whereas I find the
former really interesting and challenging
Some
Does that mean the best way to go fro ID, Class Names, Variables, etc... is
interCaps (also known as CamelCase or lowerCamelCase) ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CamelCase
R
- Original Message -
From: Ben Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, July 08,
http://www.standards-schmandards.com/index.php?2005/03/01/16-ajax-and-accessibility
http://adactio.com/journal/display.php/20050308163812.xml
- Original Message -
From: Maarten Stolte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 5:55 PM
Subject: [WSG]
Cheat!
Use a styleswitcher to to display your 'text-only' courier-based stylesheet
:o)
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: [WSG] looking for an accessibility reference on why
, June 30, 2005 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] looking for an accessibility reference on why text-only
is bad
On 6/30/05, Richard Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use a styleswitcher to to display your 'text-only' courier-based
stylesheet
We *could* do that... but I'd rather educate the client
Hi tee,
I still think the strong tag is the way to go for you.
In your example you have inline text that you want to make bold and a diff
colour and font.
This *shounds* like you want to strongly emphasis that text. Why not use the
strong element to do it?
You can still apply your styles:
Hi all,
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in ordered
lists (ie: the thing between the list item number and the value of the list
item). For example...
1.
a)
1 -
a:
I need this ability to replicate government legislation and apparently it
has to be an
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS List Separator
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Wondering how we can get CSS to specifity the spearator used in ordered
lists
As far as I can tell, you should be able to define that with the styles
provided for automatic numbering and lists in CSS 2.1
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21
In terms of accessibility and usability...
what's the difference between RESET and refreshing the page?
R
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Boehmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:48 AM
Subject: [WSG] the use of reset buttons on
Would love to, Peter, but this month I have an engagement I can't get out
of.
See you next month...
Richard :o)
- Original Message -
From: Peter Firminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 11:46 AM
Subject: [WSG] Sydney and Melbourne WSG
Maybe we can steer it towards web standards?
Anyone interested in Privacy as a standard should check out the W3C's
Platform for Privacy Preferences
http://www.w3.org/P3P/
This is a W3C Recommendation and has been around for a bit now...
Richard :o)
Perhaps the point here should be:
If you have a Flash Site and an HTML Site, then why not make the HTML Site
accessible?
It takes exactly the same amount of effort and it's not as though your
design is extrameley difficult to be realised in standards compliant
XHTML/CSS.
Why not take a couple of
Hi all ;o)
Requesting a site check as well as design comments/suggestions...
www.vfme.com
Off-list responses encouraged, but if it's an issue you think everyone would
benefit from please post on-list.
BTW: if anyone wants to contribute a recipe, that would be great too!
Many thanks,
Richard
, Richard Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all ;o)
Requesting a site check as well as design comments/suggestions...
www.vfme.com
Off-list responses encouraged, but if it's an issue you think everyone
would
benefit from please post on-list.
BTW: if anyone wants to contribute a recipe
This is a great issue and one where I think the WSG can take the lead and
put forward a standard.
To Patrick's comment
'header' is a tricky one and your points about its print origins are very
valid. Perhaps we can take that and still use the print reference by calling
it 'masthead' as this
Are users really *that* impatient? Does the physically disabled site user
not even bother to see if the content on the page is worth-while? As a
developer who believes in validation, would you not bother looking at a page
if you you didn't see a little xhtml link at the bottom?
Should we bother
I accept the point, Russ.
However, on a practical level, the concern that Ben expressed regarding
accessibility compared to the importance of the content on the page is a
decision the users need to make all the time and one that doesn't usually
cost a lot:
Interesting content... I guess I'll
How about plain old form elements?
Example:
style type=text/css
form { font: 65%/1.2 verdana, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 3em; }
fieldset { margin-bottom: 0.3em; border: none; }
label { width: 160px; }
label.radio { width: auto; }
input, select, textarea { font-family: verdana; font-size: 1.0em;
Let's combine a whole bunch of different CSS concepts and hope
it works in everything. :o)
Check out this link:
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/test/test.html
Here's the CSS:
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/test/styles/style.css
On the navigation:
1. The suckerfish drop down on "services" in the
Hi all,
Just wondering if there is a compatibility chart out there for CSS
properties in HTML emails.
We've got charts for the browsers, but what about email clients?
Additionally, what about CSS support in mobile phone browsers?
What browsers are used in which mobile phones?
If anyone has
Use JavaScript to communicate to flash's command and arguments.
Look up how to do this in Google.
:o)
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: [WSG] A HREF around a Flash Object?
Hi
In answer to your question, Sigurd - the asterisk indicates that that
attribute is required for that elements (as opposed to optional).
For example, if you use the img you MUST include a SRC and an ALT
attribute for it to be valid.
Cheers :o)
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Sigurd
great comments thus far, but i think we're getting into the area where
things are being said twice or getting into wy too fine a point.
when exactly does this thread get closed?
r
- Original Message -
From: Paul Novitski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday,
Hi guys,
Here's a little script that might help this issue.
It takes the element with the id of content and adds an extra white space
at the end of a sentence to the existing one.
This way, the code is still clean and you can have your whitespace cake and
eat it too! :o)
function addSpace() {
too true paul
forgot about those nasty little buggers :o)
oh well
R :o)
- Original Message -
From: Paul Novitski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] double space after period
At 03:31 PM 2/9/2005, Richard
nice work :o)
you can get a badge!
http://images.google.com/images?q=w3c+validationimgsz=iconhl=enlr=ie=UTF
-8rls=GGLC,GGLC:1970-01,GGLC:enstart=20sa=N
:o)
R
- Original Message -
From: Brendan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:21
/neerav
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Sure but this only works on, like, two browsers!
Is there a funckier CSS hack kind of way?
:o)
Richard
- Original Message -
*From:* Kevin Futter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Hi all :o)
Just a quick query: we all know that to havre a little link on
the bottom of the page to validate XHTML and CSS we can use a funky URL with the
term "referer" in the address. What about Accessibility validation for Bobby or
Cynthia? The only way I know how to do this is to
Had the same problem with my holiday snaps :o)
Check out http://www.grafx.com.au/dik/region.html?MuiNe-1-21 for an example
of how it's done.
Hope this helps :o)
R
- Original Message -
From: BonusOntwerp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
Hi all,
Trying to find examples, resources that define how StyleSheets
should be organised. There's been dicussion of how to arrange your classes and
IDs and I'm just wondering, what about base generic styles that don't need to be
referenced by class or ID... Does anyone out there start
You can also do this with _javascript_:Here's
the script I use that outputs the following (check out the title
tag!):www.grafx.com.au :: v2 :: scripting :: breadCrumbs.html
// Breadcrumbs Scriptvar path = "";var
href = "">var s = href.split("/");for (var
i=3;i(s.length-1);i++) {path+="a
Ummm.. hate to gripe about this but... YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING!
I don't know about many of you guys, but I'd love my company to be a member
of the W3C.
Considering my company has about 4 members of staff, I'm wondering where we
can dig up the AUD $7765 for membership
Still, it's a good
OK, so maybe I'm a little too bored/geeky for my own
good...
The following code fixes something that's been bugging me for
a while.
Everyone but IE seems to be able to use the "content"
attribute in CSS.
This bit of _javascript_ basically fixes that. Read the comments
in the code and have
Try address/address
style type=text/css
address { display: block; color: etc... }
/style
R :o)
- Original Message -
From: James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject: [WSG] markup for postal addresses?
Hi all
I'm trying to
I think with things like this the KISS principle comes to mind... or if you
prefer:
Be Semantic - Not Pedantic
:o)
R
- Original Message -
From: James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject: [WSG] markup for postal addresses?
Hi
As a way to nicely tie up this little thread... :o)
Once you've put your border-left 1 pixel, use the DOM to find the UL
(perhaps through an ID) and remove the first LI's border.
IF JavaScript is turned off - you're no worse off...
function listBorderKill() {
if
Hi all :o)
Would appreciate any comments.
PLEASE NOTE: Mac people - sorry not there yet, so don't even
bother. I've served you up a crappy print style sheet :o(
Here she is -
http://www.grafx.com.au/wip/withPassion/
Thanks in advance :o)
Richard
Thanks Ted and John :o)
The disconnecting text is not something I can change as this design element
was specified by the client.
I've fixed the topNav -10px wierdness - only happened on the home page -
quelle bizarre! :o)
No hover effect on action items (yet)
Top Nav landing pages do not exist
Hi All - I've actually come across this before as well.
But for my machine, this error only happens when trying to validate pages
sitting on my hard-drive.
The link is for the form that checks online pages. Upload your page to a
server and try again :o)
You can get heaps of bookmarklets that
Remember with the W3 Browser Stats that it's mainly developers and geeks who
are checking this site out.
I'm guessing most of the public (and corporate sector that we build sites
for) are more inline with The Counter's results.
:o)
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Timberlake
I assumed these stats we gathered not only from their client base but from
their internet.com suite of sites - surely used by corporate and IT... ?
- Original Message -
From: Natalie Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Microsoft says Firefox not a threat to IE [OT?]
Regarding
Sorry guys - I'm not sure what the issue is here...
According to W3C, 'application/xhtml+xml' is the MIME type to use.
I've put it pages and seen it not only validate, but also display correctly
in IE5.0 and IE6.
So I'm having trouble understanding what the problem with using this is...
or why
: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME
Richard Czeiger wrote:
According to W3C, 'application/xhtml+xml' is the MIME type to use.
I've put it pages and seen it not only validate, but also display
correctly
in IE5.0 and IE6.
If IE displayed the page, rather than prompt you
Hi all :o)
Just thought I'd add this. Don't know if anyone's using something like this
but...
Here's how to add a class to your navigation to make the current page stand
out a bit more without putting it in the HTML.
This also assigns the class to any sublevel nav items in nested ULs.
Handy for
Hi all :o)
Can't find any reference to this little pecularity on the
web...
OK. So I learned that it's better to use numbers rather than
em's or % as numbers are inherited.
BUT! Whenever i have my line-height set to 1.4 (or 140% or
1.4em for that matter), all the underlines of my links
Personally, coming up with links that don't end in click here at the end of
an article or section is something I find really difficult...
The whole Find out more about ... at the bottom of each page looks too
predictable.
:o(
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Boehmer [EMAIL
no secret handshake?! I'm outta here!
;oP
Richard
- Original Message -
From:
Peter Firminger
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:36
PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] how so I stop all the
postings coming to my email box?
Hi Casey,
While
Umm,
Don't know if this is what you guys are after, but you can check out and use
the code here:
http://www.grafx.com.au/dik
All done in XHTML, CSS and JavaScript.
No database, no PHP.
All you need is to use Photoshop's Automate feature and do a bulk rename
in Windows for the images and
Hi guys - having a little problem with the whole external links in XHTML
strict.
Code's below - doesn't seem to be working - can you help out?
a href=http://www.google.com.au/; rel=externalnew window/a
script
function externalLinks()
if (!document.getElementsByTagName) return;
var
Hi guys,
I'm putting together a semantically correct UL of links for my
footer.
I'd like to have them separated by 'pipes' as this is a common
and easily recognised technique.
But the pipes themselves are irrelevant (semantically). So
here's what I've come up with...
ALSO! My one thing is
PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Semantically creating
'pipes' for footer links
For the line wrapping issue, you could
try:whitespace: nowrap;On whatever element is giving you
trouble.Cheers,Kevin FutterOn 5/10/04 11:28 AM, "Richard
Czeiger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,I
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On Tuesday, Oct 5, 2004, at 13:55 Australia/Sydney, Richard Czeiger
wrote:
Thanks for the feedback guys but the problem persists ! :o)
While Neerav's solution puts pipes before the first and after the last
- I
am trying
Nup - collapses in IE :o(
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Fluid Horizontal Lists
just a quick thought that may be completely wrong, but have you tried %
based padding for li ?
I don't know
while parking's a pain, I don't think it would take most folks over an hour
to get there if they leave work at 5:30 ...
R :o)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Reminder,
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
