Another strange possibility to consider – with which to account for lower than 
expected performance on the active side, and in fact the null side being 
slightly warmer for a unexpected proportion of the time is this: the null side 
could be active as well in a lower temperature range.

 

Otherwise, both sides should be almost identical. If hydrogen, even in trace 
amounts, collects on the so-called null side, and if the SPP modality is 
playing a role in excess heat, then both sides can be gainful under different 
parameters - since a metal catalyst per se is not needed – or stated another 
way, the dielectric/gas interface on the null sides functions as the catalyst 
for SPP formation. 

 

This possibility becomes far more relevant if there was anomalous radiation, as 
seems to be the case.

 

From: Craig Haynie 

 

Here is a video, queued to the time shortly after the green (active) 
thermocouple became hotter than the purple (control) thermocouple. The control 
had been running a couple of degrees hotter, previously. The change-over 
occurred shortly after raising the power to the point where the temperature 
went above 1020c. The timing couldn't really have been much better. This 
occurred at 2016-04-16 02:00 UTC.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyWnN--u7M 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyWnN--u7M&feature=youtu.be&t=13188> 
&feature=youtu.be&t=13188

Craig

On 04/16/2016 11:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote:

This temperature differential is more meaningful than it seems since some of 
the excess heat on the active side goes to heat the null side.  

 

The basic concept of comparative calorimetry is good, and this ceramic is not a 
great conductor of heat, but there is a conductive pathway between the two 
sides, which could possibly have been made less in an improved design. Actually 
the heater wire itself could be part of the heat transfer problem. 

 

From: Craig Haynie 

 

The optical imager is typically reading between an 18c and 20c difference.

Craig

Eric Walker wrote:

Interesting.  I hope a post-run calibration shows that when the fuel is 
removed, the active and null outside temperatures return to one another to 
within experimental uncertainty.  This will be critical to show before 
concluding anything. 

 

Eric

 

 

 

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:

60c on the latest...

https://youtu.be/VLK19pllG9g?t=6278





On 04/16/2016 10:53 AM, Eric Walker wrote:

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

I have to say.  This one is pretty fascinating.  At 1000+C they had a delta T 
of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for hours, until I gave 
up.

 

At what time in the video did you see this?  When I skipped through the video, 
I always saw the "Outside heater active" (the green line) slightly lower than 
the "Outside heater null" (purple line).  Perhaps you're referring to a delta 
between different numbers than these?

 

Eric

 

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to