Axil - That is an interesting point and it is worth following up on - since muon decay is so energetic that even a tiny anisotropy could amount to the small differential on the null side. However if there is muon decay at all - they should be seeing a signal at 511 keV.
It would be easy to confirm and intensify - since the axial magnetic field is small from the heater windings and could be greatly boosted by placement of permanent magnets (if positioned in such a way that they did not overheat) From: Axil Axil @Jones This possible heat production by the dummy is a interesting and not well appreciated complication of Muon production. If muons are produced by the active reactor, they could be producing heat in the dummy reactor. The heater could be producing a axial magnetic field the pushes most of the muons into the dummy reactor. This is how I beleive that the mouse/cat configuration works for Rossi. The dummy might well require complete isolation from the active reactor to see a valid delta temperature difference. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: Another strange possibility to consider – with which to account for lower than expected performance on the active side, and in fact the null side being slightly warmer for a unexpected proportion of the time is this: the null side could be active as well in a lower temperature range. Otherwise, both sides should be almost identical. If hydrogen, even in trace amounts, collects on the so-called null side, and if the SPP modality is playing a role in excess heat, then both sides can be gainful under different parameters - since a metal catalyst per se is not needed – or stated another way, the dielectric/gas interface on the null sides functions as the catalyst for SPP formation. This possibility becomes far more relevant if there was anomalous radiation, as seems to be the case. From: Craig Haynie Here is a video, queued to the time shortly after the green (active) thermocouple became hotter than the purple (control) thermocouple. The control had been running a couple of degrees hotter, previously. The change-over occurred shortly after raising the power to the point where the temperature went above 1020c. The timing couldn't really have been much better. This occurred at 2016-04-16 02:00 UTC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyWnN--u7M <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyWnN--u7M&feature=youtu.be&t=13188> &feature=youtu.be&t=13188 Craig On 04/16/2016 11:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote: This temperature differential is more meaningful than it seems since some of the excess heat on the active side goes to heat the null side. The basic concept of comparative calorimetry is good, and this ceramic is not a great conductor of heat, but there is a conductive pathway between the two sides, which could possibly have been made less in an improved design. Actually the heater wire itself could be part of the heat transfer problem. From: Craig Haynie The optical imager is typically reading between an 18c and 20c difference. Craig Eric Walker wrote: Interesting. I hope a post-run calibration shows that when the fuel is removed, the active and null outside temperatures return to one another to within experimental uncertainty. This will be critical to show before concluding anything. Eric On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: 60c on the latest... https://youtu.be/VLK19pllG9g?t=6278 On 04/16/2016 10:53 AM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote: I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for hours, until I gave up. At what time in the video did you see this? When I skipped through the video, I always saw the "Outside heater active" (the green line) slightly lower than the "Outside heater null" (purple line). Perhaps you're referring to a delta between different numbers than these? Eric
