It seems to me that calorimetry is a weak subject to base a defence on. Nether the judge or any of the jury will have even heard the word let alone understand why the ERV messed it up. The layers for the defence will need a expert witness to educate the court on what is good and what is ill in LENR gain measurement. Since you are a sympathetic backer of IH, you may well get the call to teach and convince the court. I will be interested in the show that will come; how you perform under pressure, and how you will avoid ad hominem attack with Ponon and Rossi in the court room. You will face Rossi head to head, mono e mono with a huge $Billion responsibility on your shoulders. Ask for a large expert fee, IH can afford the best.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why did IH allow Penon to remain the ERV if he was incompetent or >> dishonest? Why did IH allow the test to continue with a flawed calorimetry >> plan? Why wasn't the calorimetry design changed to the satisfaction of IH >> early on in the test? >> > > I do not know, but these issues have nothing to with calorimetry. You > cannot use these questions to magically discover what type of instruments > were used, or how they were employed. > > Only one thing counts here. Did the machine produce 50 times input? Or did > it produce no excess heat? The questions you ask will not bring you any > closer to the answer. Only the data can answer that. Without data, you know > nothing, and you cannot being to guess or speculate who is right. You > should not take sides when you know nothing. > > > Did you ash your contacts at IH these questions? What did they say? >> > > Those questions have nothing to do with calorimetry and they are none of > my business, and none of your business either. If I did hear anything about > such things, I would not say a word about them. This is a technical > problem. It is not about company water-cooler gossip. You will not learn > the COP of this machine by asking nosy questions about business contracts. > > > >> As Rossi claims, why was everything OK until it was time to pay the money? >> > > Rossi claims?!? Rossi has claimed he had a production line set up when > there was no such thing. He claims he spent hours inside a 1 MW reactor in > a shipping container, when that would kill him in 10 minutes. He has > claimed countless ridiculous things. Ignore his claims. Everything was NOT > okay, as I have said many times before. > > > >> Did IH confront the ERV about their concerns? Did they prepare any >> documentation describing their concerns? >> > > Whether they did or not has no bearing on calorimetry. > > > >> If this documentation exists, get its ID so it can be located in the >> trial docket. >> > > I.H. has not filed a docket yet. Did you not notice that, Mr. Pretend > Lawyer? > > - Jed > >
