It is fairly simple why. The only unbiased observer, the paid expert
ERV Penon, says the plant worked.
Rossi took IH to court, where the facts will be made known, because IH
failed to pay him what they had agreed on. It wasn't IH taking Rossi to
court. You have it backwards.
On 8/12/2016 10:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
What I don't understand is why there are not ongoing criminal
investigations for Rossi, Fabian and Penon, the fraudulent gang,
instead of only civil law implications.
It is likely that Rossi and company activities were criminal and not
just bad business practices.
It saddens me to say this about my Italian compatriots but all the
evidence points to the fact that Rossi did it again: another criminal
scam.
Giovanni
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com
<mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com
<mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
But this is the point: You can't prove that we live in an
Objective Universe. You can't prove that you're not in some
computer simulation . . .
True. But you don't have to prove it. You just have to show it is
very likely, with the fewest entities (Ockham's razor). Science is
not about absolutes, or perfect assurance.
Some philosophers of science go so far as to say that whether
something is objectively true in the real world does not even
matter, as long as it is true as far as you can tell, or more true
than any rival hypothesis. You can't tell if it is "really" true,
and it doesn't matter. True enough is good enough.
- Jed
