The writer said there was "No evidence". There obviously was.
You can claim it was wrong but not that there was no evidence.
Where is the piping drawing necessary to figure out who is right?
On 8/25/2016 9:51 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
"The power calculations depend on the steam being dry, and there's
no evidence it was."
No evidence? How about 102.8C @ atmospheric pressure, according
to the gauges?
It is not possible this was at atmospheric pressure. If that is what
the gauge showed, it was wrong. I have heard the gauge did not show this.
"They also depend on the flow meter reading accurately, and
there's no evidence that it did."
No evidence? A sealed, factory calibrated meter doesn't count?
A factory calibration will not help if the meter is the wrong type and
it is used in a pipe half full of water. A factory calibration can
only show that the meter will work right when it is used correctly.
- Jed
