My apologies, I quoted the wrong person.  I meant to respond to this
comment from Bob:

The mass differential between 2 Si-28 (27.9769) and Fe-56 at a.m. of
> 55.93494 is not very much.   It may be that Si fusion is involved in the
> Indian steel plant.
>

Eric



On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If transmutation is always accompanied by meson production, then the area
>> around the electric furnace might have an elevated background radiation
>> profile. Four tone of transmutation would imply a huge number of muons
>> produced on a daily basis.
>>
>
> If you go this route, you will have to address Narayanaswamy's own
> admission that [1]:
>
> A simple calculation shows (see Appendix A) that corresponding to 4.27
>> tons of metal transmutation [comprising the production of both silicon and
>> iron], the power generated should have been the equivalent of the total
>> thermal power generated by a couple of thousand 1 GWe nuclear power
>> stations in one 24 hr day! This may truly be termed as an astronomical
>> number!  Thus if indeed the Silcal transmutation claims are confirmed it
>> would clearly point to the operation of new Science which is even more
>> bizarre than claimed by most other LENR experiments!
>
>
> 2000 GWe * 24 hours = 1.7e17 J.  By comparison, the bomb that fell on
> Nagasaki in 1945 had about (84 TJ = 8.4e13 J) [2].  That means that if
> Narayanaswamy's calculation in Appendix A is correct, the energy output in
> a 24-hour period would have been equivalent to (1.7e17 J / 8.4e13 J = 2023
> "Fat Man" bombs), or 1.4 nuclear bombs per minute.  All in a smelting
> facility in Coimbatore, India, that was very successful and made a decent
> profit.
>
> This possibility takes us into the hoary but cute Vortex violation-of-COE
> discussions.
>
> Eric
>
>
> [1] https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/951-narayanaswamy-corrected-
> extended-abstract-17th-sept-2016-pdf/
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TNT_equivalent
>

Reply via email to