Jed, you ignore with easiness the reproducibility problem Cna you tell me the rtae of success NOW say at SKINR, ENEA, Coolescence and others?
Re the ERv report it has 600000 pages, you have seen 352 daily reports not 8448 hourly ones and not the results for 506880 minutes (approx) When the litigation story will be over and i am still here, I will organize a course of Technology Awakening for people now on the level of Exhibit 5 of IH. peter On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > mre cells with death after (no) heat. >> > > I do not know what this sentence means. Perhaps you are saying that Pd-D > does not produce heat after death. That's incorrect. It does. There is no > input power, so the COP is infinite. > > > >> probably not true for Ti- very abundent element have worked with it. For >> CF remeber Scaramuzzi and our friend Chino has done a lot with Ti. >> Au is Au and has it s place in electromivvcs. >> So please do not mention PD based commercial energy sources. >> > > You have not given any technical or practical reason why Pd-D cannot be > commercialized. If these other metals work, there would be no reason to use > Pd. But if they do not, and Pd is the only choice, it can produce a > significant fraction of our energy. Fleischmann was correct about that, and > you are wrong. > > > >> Re the Exh 1, surely i have it and what you are missing is the hourly and >> the recorded data which will make you smarter and will determine you to not >> pontificate. >> > > As far as I know, there is no hourly data. > > Anyone can see that Penon and Rossi stuffed imaginary numbers into these > spreadsheets. One-hour data that agrees with this would also be imaginary. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
