TB: Please cite any post whereby I called them any names. TB: "So far, all I have experienced is a smoke enema."
Fri 1/15/2010 8:21 PM TB: "... calorimetry is the only way to quantify the output of the Orbomination" Tue 1/5/2010 8:20 AM MI: regarding the upcoming Demo#1... Where you replied TB: "Where Sean McCarthy will try to convince you that the I^2 x R losses should not be included in the Orbo's energy balance equation." MI: Snide remark... Total conjecture on your part, and he didn't do any such thing, did he? Thu 12/31/2009 5:46 PM TB: A fool and his money MI: Another snide remark... You're full of them, aren't you! I could go back another week or two, but I think that's enough for now. The other problem I have is that you make all kinds of confident statements as if they were fact; as if you had first hand knowledge that it was true, when it is obvious you have no way of determining if they are indeed true! Thu 12/31/2009 6:55 PM TB: The Steorn motor cannot lift the string which would hold the weight. MI: how do you know it can't lift the string? Have you built one and tried it? Did Sean tell you that? No one knows, except Steorn, how much torque this technology can produce. I've seen some replication attempts that accelerate a rotor that weighs at least .25 to .5 pound to several thousand RPMs in under 30 to 40 seconds. The torque comes from the rotor PMs attraction to the core... And you having worked with plenty of PMs, rare earth ones I would imagine, you know how string the B-fld can be... Very difficult to pull two small 1/2 inch round cylindrical magnets apart once they are within about 1/8 inch. Sat 1/16/2010 8:25 PM TB: Steorn has no idea how much energy is consumed by the bearings' heat and the windage heat. He has not done calorimetry. He is conjecturing. Since there is really no way to measure heating due to windage or bearings without calorimetry his conjecture is unfounded. MI: Again, how the hell do you know what experiments they have done over the last several years??? You expect him to come out and tell you everything the first time round... Well, sorry to disappoint you, but he's getting the info out there in a methodical way. How do you know they haven't done Calorimetry??? Perhap's they have and the results were 3:1, so he reported that result, but not how they got it. Has anyone asked? Yes, and his reply was that that is what they intend to show on Demo#3, done by a German company with expertise in calorimetry. What more do you want? TB: He SAYS he will perform calorimetry in the future which means he has not performed it in the past. MI: Say what???? It means NO SUCH THING... "I will have a beer on Wednesday" does not even imply that I have never had a beer. You simply cannot draw that confident, no-qualifier conclusion from the statement about doing a calorimetry test in the future. What I see in your posts, TB, is overconfident, arrogant intelligence... And you wonder why you were banned? Probably not the first time, eh? Can you say, "Clueless"? Perhaps you should learn to ask questions minus the snide, derogatory remarks. -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Back EMF: Sean may be right On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mark Iverson <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > So Sean saying that > they've already done the calorimetry and determined it empirically > would not help you one bit --- you would still call them liars and scammers! Please cite any post whereby I called them any names. AAMOF I defended against those who do call them scammers. You must have a problem with the language. Please cite any post on any list whereby Sean says they HAVE performed calorimetry. Doesn't exist. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.147/2628 - Release Date: 01/16/10 23:35:00
