In order to be commercially viable, the Godes reactor must move to a high temperature hydrogen gas phase reactor. If enough R&D funding is available to do this, why go public.
A few months ago, Godes went public when he needed more R&D funds. This strategy worked and he got the additional funding he needs to move forward. Addition publicity is a distraction at this juncture. This type of attention is not helpful in the successful commercialization of his product. Cheers: Axil On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote: > If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the > poster child for CF/LENR?! And why hasn't the CF/LENR research community > exhaustively investigated the system and built working models that would > show, irrefutably, that CF/LENR is real? In following this list I've read > about scores of theoretical systems and theories that it seems no one has > actually made work reliably and here you're claiming the Godes/McKubre > system not only works but works reliably! > > Can anyone explain why this system isn't being refined and promoted at the > very least as proof of CF/LENR? > > [mg] > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >> >> Is this the first paper in which one group has reported100% success in >>> multiple tests (over 150)? >>> >> >> Yup, it may be. I do not recall seeing such a high success rate before. >> >> There may have been a few poorly documented reports of 100% success that >> I suspected were 100% instrument artifacts. I seem to recall some, but I do >> not remember who made these claims. They did not publish a paper. I do not >> remember uploading anything like that. I think I would remember it. >> >> Normally I would be very suspicious of an effect that appears every time, >> on demand. But when it comes from a a top-notch lab such as SRI I am not >> going to worry about it. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
