Yes, that's what they meant; the idea being, if it was really fusion,
there would be deadly radiation that would have killed everyone around.
In addition, if it /were/ to be true, in the hands of the wrong people
could be dangerous for our planet.
My next paragraph in the article was:
/Sigh./
/The very much alive Mr. Godes does believe this is a nuclear reaction,
but to quote Nobel Laureate Julian Schwinger, whose 1991 A Progress
Report paper you can down-load from the Brillouin Energy website, ”The
circumstances of cold fusion are not those of hot fusion.”
/
http://coldfusionnow.org/funding-dam-breaks-for-brillouin-boiler-that-uses-water//
/
It is these attitudes that make it vitally important to have all
segments of society onboard to support this clean and /safe/ form of
dense energy.
Ruby/
/
On 9/18/12 3:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ruby <r...@hush.com <mailto:r...@hush.com>> wrote:
/One possible private donor seeking a technical evaluation was
informed by a //National Science Foundation//member (whose review
entailed “a quick scan” of the Brillouin Energy website) that it
was “quite possible they had created the ‘instant death’ version
of cold fusion”. / "
What do you think they meant by that?!? That is a strange thing to
say. Did they mean the cell might produce a fatal dose of radiation?
If it could do that, it probably would have in the years they were
working on it. They would be dead already.
Maybe it means instant death to the skeptical point of view.
- Jed
--
Ruby Carat
r...@coldfusionnow.org <mailto:r...@coldfusionnow.org>
United States 1-707-616-4894
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org <http://www.coldfusionnow.org>
