On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Randy wuller <rwul...@freeark.com> wrote:
> ** > Joshua: > > > First, telling us how the majority of observers feel about the report is > clearly beyond your knowledge. As Eric suggested making those claims > without proof (poll, census, etc.) is not only unscientific it is > undoubtedly just self serving on your part. > Garbage. Everyone, including skeptics, repeatedly sings about the revolution this would bring if real. And many people have seen the claims, now. If they believed them, they would not ignore it. > The scientific community passed up the opportunity to investigate this > science long ago and are now at the mercy of the entrepreneur, if it is > real. > Nah, they gave it far more attention than it deserved, and concluded there was nothing there, and moved on. > > One thing I am certain about is that you don't speak for the scientific > community. > You're right about that. I'm only expressing what is common sense to all but the true believers.
