It's just more schroedinger e-cat news. Until it happens, observation of the event occurs, and the probability wave form collapses into reality - it can go either way. The eCat may live or the eCat may die.
Truthfully, I think Andrea has so far been batting around 10%, so I give it that as the probability that this will actually occur. Or if it does, it will be probably leave many questions open. I think this 'test' is also an excuse as to why he's not doing the other long term test that they talked about with the swedish scientists. Whatever happened to that? On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:32 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Apart from the planned six month test by the scientists that tested the > E-Cat for Elforsk May 2013, it seems there will be another six month test > in the US. > > > 1. Andrea Rossi > September 4th, 2013 at 6:30 > PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=816&cpage=8#comment-788897> > > Frank Acland: > As we said, a 6 months long validation test had to be made, and I > repeated that validation of the E-Cat is in course. As always, I will not > give any specific information regarding the validation test in course, with > exception of the fact that this test will last more than 6 months. The > results will be published after the test will have been completed, whatever > the results, positive or negative. > I do not know where the publication will be made, because it does not > depend on me. Also this long run test is being performed by an indipendent > commettee, financed by institutions totally indipendent from us. Obviously > the location in which the test is in course will be disclosed in the > publication that will be made. I can only say that it is in the USA factory > of a Customer. The E-Cats under test have been manufactured completely in > the USA, in the factory of the US Manufacturer, indipendently from me: > therefore also the manufacturing has been made by an indipendent- from- me > party. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > >
