"At this point I would say only a fool would bet against Rossi." Yeah, you talk the talk, but ...
Kinda like Rossi, I guess. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Truthfully, I think Andrea has so far been batting around 10%, so I give >> it that as the probability that this will actually occur. >> > > I disagree. As far as I know, every major claim he has made has turned out > to be true. He said there was an independent test, and there was, conducted > by Elforsk. Years ago he said there were independents tests in the U.S. and > a gadget running a factor in Italy for months. Many people who have no > connection to Rossi confirmed those claims, including some people who do > not get along with him. > > Rossi is a flamboyant person who says things that do not seem to make > sense. In some cases he says things about his business that are > exaggerated. He has said things about me and others that were flat-out > wrong. He sometimes gets emotional. He was very upset then the people at > NASA discovered his reactor was plugged up and not working. However, I have > never -- repeat *never* -- caught him making an experimental claim that I > now know for a fact was wrong, or a lie. > > He makes mistakes, of course. Everyone does, especially people doing > cutting edge research into unknown phenomena. That is unavoidable. I am > sure Rossi would agree. Someone said to Stan Pons: "You were half wrong > about your claims. There were no neutrons." He said something like: "In our > line of work when you are half right, you're doing great." > > At this point I would say only a fool would bet against Rossi. > > - Jed > >
