Also, how come Rossi isn't buying pizza? http://cold-fusion.ca/rossi-pledges-free-pizza-and-beer-306000
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:42 AM, blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>wrote: > It's just more schroedinger e-cat news. Until it happens, observation of > the event occurs, and the probability wave form collapses into reality - it > can go either way. The eCat may live or the eCat may die. > > Truthfully, I think Andrea has so far been batting around 10%, so I give > it that as the probability that this will actually occur. Or if it does, > it will be probably leave many questions open. > > I think this 'test' is also an excuse as to why he's not doing the other > long term test that they talked about with the swedish scientists. > Whatever happened to that? > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:32 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> Apart from the planned six month test by the scientists that tested the >> E-Cat for Elforsk May 2013, it seems there will be another six month test >> in the US. >> >> >> 1. Andrea Rossi >> September 4th, 2013 at 6:30 >> PM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=816&cpage=8#comment-788897> >> >> Frank Acland: >> As we said, a 6 months long validation test had to be made, and I >> repeated that validation of the E-Cat is in course. As always, I will not >> give any specific information regarding the validation test in course, >> with >> exception of the fact that this test will last more than 6 months. The >> results will be published after the test will have been completed, >> whatever >> the results, positive or negative. >> I do not know where the publication will be made, because it does not >> depend on me. Also this long run test is being performed by an indipendent >> commettee, financed by institutions totally indipendent from us. Obviously >> the location in which the test is in course will be disclosed in the >> publication that will be made. I can only say that it is in the USA >> factory >> of a Customer. The E-Cats under test have been manufactured completely in >> the USA, in the factory of the US Manufacturer, indipendently from me: >> therefore also the manufacturing has been made by an indipendent- from- me >> party. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> >
