Take a look at the third party test results. http://pesn.com/2014/04/29/9602478_Solar-Hydrogen-Trends_revolutionizing-all-energy/SHT_performance%20_test.pdf
I could not find how long this test ran. On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 12:07 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 2 May 2014 16:28:20 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> How much energy does it take to make TETA? Its an old radioactive > >> chelating agent and not cheap used in decontamination. However, it > >> production costs may have improved since the time we used it > >> > > > >US $20-22 / *Liter* *( FOB Price)* > >800 Liters *(Min. Order)* > > > >The economic flaw in this system is the cost of the consumables. > > I wonder if they have taken into account all possible sources of energy in > the > system? The temperatures available during cavitation would likely catalyze > any > chemical reaction that was energetically possible, and then there is the > energy > from ultrasound generators etc. as well. > I don't expect that the latter would contribute much, however the chemical > energy could be considerable. I would like to see a proper accounting, > especially given the claim that they can get 1 kg H2 from 1 kg H2O. That > claim > is most likely a simple mistake, but might be true if the Hydrogen is also > coming from other chemicals in the mix. > In order for it to be true for only water, they would have to be > converting all > the Oxygen into Hydrogen too, which apparently is what they believe is > happening. If so, then they are being extraordinarily wasteful. In order to > split Oxygen into Hydrogen you need to supply roughly the binding energy of > Oxygen which is about 127,000,000 eV. Having spent 127,000,000 eV > converting > Oxygen into Hydrogen, they then get back about 12 eV in chemical energy, > when > the Hydrogen is burnt using atmospheric oxygen, about 1 part in 10 million > of > the energy input. They might do better to find a means of tapping the > original > energy source more directly. ;) > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
