You should ask the people that are at this time developping it, and Lydia, how they will handle this. Because they will, it's in the Wikibase DataModel, the same as qualifiers.
We will probably be provided with options on how we want to handle ranks, unknown values and so on when we will build a query in Wikibase. 2015-04-23 12:27 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > Hoi, > Yes you get both results at best and maybe arbitrarily only one never mind > which one. It requires a query engine that is so smart that it is no longer > the kind of query engine I know exists. > Thanks, > GerardM > > > > On 23 April 2015 at 12:18, Thomas Douillard <thomas.douill...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You should read the helpages Gerard sometimes :) >> >> This is on the Wikidata plan since the beginning, it is usable since the >> beginning, and it will be queryable ... I really don't understand what >> bothers you. >> >> 2015-04-23 12:12 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hoi, >>> For me it is obvious ... this search for perfection is an enemy of what >>> is good in Wikidata. It destroys the results of queries. It is not usable >>> and it is only of use in a very small percentage of cases. >>> >>> Compare it with the "female mayor" question. Our issue is that we have >>> not enough data in the first place and we should concentrate on making >>> things easier to comprehend not weigh it down with the balast of >>> discussions elsewhere. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 23 April 2015 at 11:56, Thomas Douillard <thomas.douill...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In wikidata, the absence of a claim about something cannot mean the >>>> claim has no couterpart in reality, as Wikidata is an will always be >>>> incomplete. >>>> >>>> For example if we have a series, maybe finished, maybe unfinished, we >>>> wil have claims that says: >>>> >>>> Episode 2 follows Episode 1 >>>> Episode 3 follows Episode 2 >>>> ... >>>> >>>> If for some reason we're sure that the series is other, we can state >>>> no value follows Episode 2 >>>> >>>> Which means "We're sure the series is other". >>>> >>>> Otherwise this means "Wikidata do not know", for some reason there >>>> could be a following episode but noone updated Wikidata yet, for example. >>>> >>>> 2015-04-23 11:33 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hoi, >>>>> Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? >>>>> Having a "no value" is imho understanding only a complication of saying >>>>> nothing... Why not say nothing in the first place ? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> GerardM >>>>> >>>>> On 22 April 2015 at 21:52, Markus Krötzsch < >>>>> mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Thomas, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 22.04.2015 20:06, Thomas Douillard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, there is items about Wikibase data model in Wikidata (created by >>>>>>> me, >>>>>>> but not only) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I understand correctly, they could be cited in the semantic web as >>>>>>> https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q19798647 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "No value" is exactly that: not a value. It should not be confused >>>>>> with a (definite) value that is used with claims (as the item description >>>>>> seems to suggest). The reason why we introduced "no value" was to be able >>>>>> to say this without resorting to a "special value" to represent this. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can also find some rationale about this in our article "Wikidata: >>>>>> a free collaborative knowledgebase" (see >>>>>> https://ddll.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Article4002/en). Basically, the >>>>>> main point is that, if you are querying for two people with a common >>>>>> child, >>>>>> you wouldn't want to get pairs of people who both have "novalue" as a >>>>>> value >>>>>> for "child". The same is true for "some value" (sometimes referred to as >>>>>> "unknown value") -- again, if this would be a definite "special" value, >>>>>> and >>>>>> be treated like a value in queries, it would lead to wrong results. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Markus >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> (If they are kept /o\) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom² >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>>>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
