Hoi,
That does not clarify it. So what would we say ... it is in dispute sure
but the way we work is that we have a child as a known person. So sources
may dispute to their hearts content.. It is a relation that goes both
ways.. How do we say novalue because it has to be a person ... "John Doe"
does not apply.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 23 April 2015 at 11:37, Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de>
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? Having
> a
> > "no value" is imho understanding only a complication of saying nothing...
> > Why not say nothing in the first place ?
>
> It is important for cases like the following for example: Source A
> says "X had a child" and source B says "X had no child".
>
>
> Cheers
> Lydia
>
> --
> Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
> Product Manager for Wikidata
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
> Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
> 10963 Berlin
> www.wikimedia.de
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
>
> Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
> unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
> Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
