You should read the helpages Gerard sometimes :)

This is on the Wikidata plan since the beginning, it is usable since the
beginning, and it will be queryable ... I really don't understand what
bothers you.

2015-04-23 12:12 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>:

> Hoi,
> For me it is obvious ... this search for perfection is an enemy of what is
> good in Wikidata. It destroys the results of queries. It is not usable and
> it is only of use in a very small percentage of cases.
>
> Compare it with the "female mayor" question. Our issue is that we have not
> enough data in the first place and we should concentrate on making things
> easier to comprehend not weigh it down with the balast of discussions
> elsewhere.
> Thanks,
>       GerardM
>
> On 23 April 2015 at 11:56, Thomas Douillard <thomas.douill...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In wikidata, the absence of a claim about something cannot mean the claim
>> has no couterpart in reality, as Wikidata is an will always be incomplete.
>>
>> For example if we have a series, maybe finished, maybe unfinished, we wil
>> have claims that says:
>>
>> Episode 2 follows Episode 1
>> Episode 3 follows Episode 2
>> ...
>>
>> If for some reason we're sure that the series is other, we can state
>> no value follows Episode 2
>>
>> Which means "We're sure the series is other".
>>
>> Otherwise this means "Wikidata do not know", for some reason there could
>> be a following episode but noone updated Wikidata yet, for example.
>>
>> 2015-04-23 11:33 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hoi,
>>> Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? Having
>>> a "no value" is imho understanding only a complication of saying nothing...
>>> Why not say nothing in the first place ?
>>> Thanks,
>>>      GerardM
>>>
>>> On 22 April 2015 at 21:52, Markus Krötzsch <
>>> mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>
>>>> On 22.04.2015 20:06, Thomas Douillard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, there is items about Wikibase data model in Wikidata (created by
>>>>> me,
>>>>> but not only)
>>>>>
>>>>> If I understand correctly, they could be cited in the semantic web as
>>>>> https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q19798647
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "No value" is exactly that: not a value. It should not be confused with
>>>> a (definite) value that is used with claims (as the item description seems
>>>> to suggest). The reason why we introduced "no value" was to be able to say
>>>> this without resorting to a "special value" to represent this.
>>>>
>>>> You can also find some rationale about this in our article "Wikidata: a
>>>> free collaborative knowledgebase" (see
>>>> https://ddll.inf.tu-dresden.de/web/Article4002/en). Basically, the
>>>> main point is that, if you are querying for two people with a common child,
>>>> you wouldn't want to get pairs of people who both have "novalue" as a value
>>>> for "child". The same is true for "some value" (sometimes referred to as
>>>> "unknown value") -- again, if this would be a definite "special" value, and
>>>> be treated like a value in queries, it would lead to wrong results.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Markus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> (If they are kept /o\)
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom²
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to