> As mentionned OpenBTS laurent's decomposition demod seems to be way
> better than the current one (from the limited testing I did). Another
> benefit is that you can exploit CUDA _a_lot_ for the first stage of a
> multi ARFCN receiver. (when you do the math you'll see that things fit
> together nicely and you end up with a bunch of complex MACs and at the
> output you have N channels of I/Q samples pre-multiplied for
> laurent's).

i am currently implementing a freq_xlating_fir_filter_ccf and a
fractional_interpolator_cc in cuda. next would be the viterbi decoder.
is this not the optimal algorithm to implement?

_______________________________________________
A51 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51

Reply via email to