"when the elections are nocking on the door, every one is so keen to
expose themselves as a well-wishers of disabled."

I don't know if the above statement is true.  But I would be delighted
if it is true as it would mean that we, the disabled, are considered
as a vote bank by the political parties.  Once that happens, we can be
hopeful of our voices being heard.  But I doubt whether  the above
statement is true.

On 2/22/14, Sanchit Katiyar <katiyarsanchit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the government is so keen to bring the new disabilities in the
> perview of law, what did it do in the last ten years? When the
> amendments were proposed in the PWD act of 1995, why did the
> government close its eyes to the amendments? when the elections are
> nocking on the door, every one is so keen to expose themselves as a
> well-wishers of disabled. it is nothing but a political stunt.
>
> Given the current scenario, it is the best option to include new
> disabilities in the PWD act, 1995 through the Ordinance and let them
> be benefitted. but for the long run, let the parliamentary committee
> to do its work.
>
> one thing is very clear that once this retrograde bill becomes an act
> through an ordinance, then this bill be passed in the parliament also.
> we will have to wait another 25 years to get our demands be included
> in the new bill.
>
> We will not let this retrograde bill be enacted as a law through a
> biased Ordinance. Biased in the sense that some people are trying to
> earn political points through this ordinance.
>
> "nobody will give you rights, you have to take them."
>
> On 2/22/14, abid...@gmail.com <abid...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> AN URGENT CLARIFICATION:
>>
>> Friends,
>>
>> Before all of you go into a collective frenzy, please read my statement
>> below.
>>
>> The issue of an Ordinance was brought up by Lok Sansad vis a vis their
>> remaing Bills. In their speech before Shri Rahul Gandhi, they made this
>> demand. Somehow the Disability Rights Bill got mixed up there.
>>
>> My own view was and is that the concept of an Ordinance is not a very
>> good
>> idea in a democracy. It is certainly not a preferred option.
>>
>> However, if MSJE initiates a process and if the UPA Government decides to
>> bring an Ordinance, especially to placate the groups of neglected,
>> marginalised disabilities and the deaf people who are in an urgent need
>> to
>> enjoy their rights, then I for one will not oppose it either.
>>
>> So, the sum total is as follows: One, bringing an Ordinance is not my
>> idea
>> or that of DRG. Two, as of now, I am neither for it nor against it.
>> Three,
>> for sure, we (DRG) are not going to agitate for it.
>>
>> With good wishes,
>>
>> Javed Abidi
>> 22.2.2014
>>
>> Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: vishal M <vishalcse2...@gmail.com>
>> Sender: "AccessIndia" <accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:14:02
>> To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues
>> concerning   the disabled.<accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
>> Reply-To: "AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues
>>      concerning the disabled." <accessindia@accessindia.org.in>
>> Subject: Re: [AI] Protest against promised ordinance to clear RPD Bill at
>>  AICC Office today
>>
>> These days the government decisions are based on the inclination of Mr.
>> Rahul Gandhi towards any issue. Whether its about increasing the number
>> of
>> attempts in UPSC, One Rank one pension thing or scrapping of the
>> amendment
>> in RPA. Mr. Javed Abidi has also resorted to Rahul Gandhi now for an
>> ordinance route.
>> I think a protest at Rahul Gandhi's house and a meeting with him will do
>> good to the cause.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vishal
>> On Feb 22, 2014 11:03 AM, "avinash shahi" <shahi88avin...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mr Javed Abidi what do yu want?
>>> if this Bill would have truly been consensus Bill, all parties had
>>> passed it consentually. But ironically, they understood the huge
>>> ramification and referred it to a standing committee but you who claim
>>> yourself as a disability activist still harping hard for its passage
>>> by hook and crook to earn political points.
>>> you have unnecessarily wasted our time and misleeded media. but we
>>> have always fought for our rights and will not let this retrograde
>>> Bill be passed through an ordinance
>>> If you are honestly concerned about newly included categories,consider
>>> this suggestion seriously. Ask your gandhis (Mother and Son)to bring
>>> an amendment to existing PWD 1995 act via an ordinance and incorporate
>>> provisions where all benefits and services be available to newly
>>> included disabled categories also. let standing committee do its job
>>> for ensuring true inclusion and providing rights in consonance with
>>> UNCRPD for all sections which India has ratified.
>>> Hope this makes sense...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Avinash Shahi
>>> M.Phil Research Scholar
>>> Centre for The Study of Law and Governance
>>> Jawaharlal Nehru University
>>> New Delhi India
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility
>>> of
>>> mobile phones / Tabs on:
>>>
>>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Search for old postings at:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send a message to
>>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
>>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>>
>>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>>> please visit the list home page at
>>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Disclaimer:
>>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>>> the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its
>>> veracity;
>>>
>>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the
>>> mails
>>> sent through this mailing list..
>>>
>>
>>
>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility
>> of
>> mobile phones / Tabs on:
>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> Search for old postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a message to
>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please
>> visit the list home page at
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> Disclaimer:
>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>> the
>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>>
>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the
>> mails
>> sent through this mailing list..
>>
>>
>> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility
>> of
>> mobile phones / Tabs on:
>> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> Search for old postings at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a message to
>> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
>> with the subject unsubscribe.
>>
>> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes,
>> please
>> visit the list home page at
>> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>>
>>
>> Disclaimer:
>> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of
>> the
>> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>>
>> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the
>> mails
>> sent through this mailing list..
>>
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Sanchit Katiyar.
>
> E-Mail:
> katiyarsanchit...@gmail.com
>
> Skype ID:
> sanchit.katiyar11
>
> facebook:
> http://www.facebook.com/sanchit.katiyar.5
>
> Mobile:
> +919013816320.
> +919456616244.
>
>
>
> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
> mobile phones / Tabs on:
> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to
> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
> visit the list home page at
> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>
> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
> sent through this mailing list..
>


-- 
G. Vamshi
Mobile: +91 9949349497
Skype: gvamshi81

www.retinaindia.org
>From darkness unto light



Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to