Rick,
You pose some interesting questions. I'd like to add another one...
Does anyone have any metrics comparing 4D Server as a web server
versus 4D Standalone (e.g. 4D Runtime Classic). I'd think the 'user
interface' adds some overhead, but I've not done any real world
testing in this regard.
We have installed 4D Servers in the past, just so they can be run as
a service, but it seems we end up running them as normal apps. I
certainly prefer windows servers over mac servers.
Just my ramblings ;)
James.
On 13 Sep 2005, at 18:24, Rick Hazey wrote:
I'm curious what versions of 4D people are using in a production
environment. In my case, any Active4D site I build will be exposed
to the internet, so I'm inclined to use 4D Server so I can run it
as service/daemon.
Is there any other advantage to using 4D Server over straight 4D?
Or vice versa? Any advantage to using Windows over Mac? Or vice versa?
What about maintenance? Any advantages to updating using 4D client
over straight 4D? I'm thinking of changes to the structure or
methods in this case.
Comments and suggestions would be appreciated.
_______________________________________________
Active4D-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev
Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
_______________________________________________
Active4D-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev
Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
