In view of these results, my customer has just instructed me to configure Apache in front of 4D on Windows so I now have about a day (!?! :) ) to learn something about Apache rewrites and come up with a proof of concept prototype.
Setting up apache for Active4D has been documented on the wiki:
http://wiki.aparajitaworld.com/A4D-Apache+Configuration
I'm not sure however if it will make any difference since 4D is still at the end of the line (for dynamic pages anyway). The question is whether 4D (Windows) error threshold will just be the same in response to proxy forwarding by Apache as it is when serving directly.
The error threshold will be the same, however most pages tend to be made up of a single dynamic content request and many static content requests. So moving the static content to apache will significantly reduce the number of requests that reach 4D.
Regards, Aparajita www.aparajitaworld.com "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
