Products change and get upgraded. And you honestly cannot compare a
version ago product with what is the current released version.
Historic is just that...
SUS (WSUS 1.0) sucked as well.. that doesn't mean that WSUS 2.0 is just
as sucky or perfect... but that it's the next version and each one these
days should stand on it's own.
Oh and there's a WSUS 3.0 being discussed...
Timo Ed wrote:
Brian, I cannot comment on the latest versions of SMS, but I can say
that I was extremely unimpressed with SMS 1.2. The product was badly
designed and didn't work. I assume its a lot better these days, but
historically SMS was not a option worthy of consideration.
In addition, I believe the licencing costs are considerably higher
than many of the other options available. I recall small site
installations costing over US$50K.
Rgds,
Tim
On 5/2/06, Brian Desmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm missing why nobody has mentioned SMS - www.microsoft.com/sms.
<snip>
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
