SMS 2003 is light years different than 1.2 or even 2.0. Its certainly worth another evaluation, especially with feature packs like Operating System Deployment and Mobile Device management packs.
SMS is one of those products you get out of it what you put into it. Tim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timo Ed Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Asset Inventory (OT) Brian, I cannot comment on the latest versions of SMS, but I can say that I was extremely unimpressed with SMS 1.2. The product was badly designed and didn't work. I assume its a lot better these days, but historically SMS was not a option worthy of consideration. In addition, I believe the licencing costs are considerably higher than many of the other options available. I recall small site installations costing over US$50K. Rgds, Tim On 5/2/06, Brian Desmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm missing why nobody has mentioned SMS - www.microsoft.com/sms. <snip> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
