Hi, Al. 

 

This is exactly what we are doing here at SSU. We did this for a couple
of reasons. One is that our procedures change more often than our
policies. Second, our policies are approved by the Board of Trustees,
while our procedures are approved by the President. We not only broke
procedures away from policies, we subdivided them by topic. Take a look
at our website to see how we have done this. My only issue with this
system is that it is very labor intensive. 

 

http://shawnee.edu/leadership/policies/policies_numeric.aspx

 

Sarah L. Brown, M.B.A., RP

Legal Assistant /Public Records Officer

Office of General Counsel

Shawnee State University

Portsmouth, OH 45662

Phone: (740) 351-3046
http://shawnee.edu/offices/general-counsel/

 

CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION              This e-mail and any files
transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use
of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  This communication
may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege.  If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this
e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing,
or copying of this e-mail and any file attachments is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately notify the General Counsel's Office by telephone at
740.351.3283 or by reply mail to the sender.  You must destroy the
original transmission and its contents. 

P Think Green!  Before printing this e-mail, ask the question... is it
necessary?

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan
Sibert
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:55 AM
To: Institutional policy-related discussions
Subject: RE:[acupa-l] Editing or Revising policies versus procedures

 

I am also interested in knowing what "usual" practice is in this area -
and possibly in expanding the discussion slightly.

 

When this position was created at UNG (and I was thrust into it) I was
given a template which combined a policy with its procedure(s) in a
single document.  As I have worked towards implementation, I saw this as
a potential problem area since procedures would be changed more
frequently that their underlying policy.

 

What we (just last week) decided to do was to split the procedures out
into separate documents, with a link in each document tying it to the
other.  Each document will now contain its own update log.

 

Any discussion of how someone has implemented this variation (problems
discovered, lessons learned, etc.) would also be appreciated.

 

 

Alan 

Alan Sibert

University Policies Coordinator

 

UNIVERSITY of  

  NORTH GEORGIA

 

Physical Address:    60 West Main Street / Room 239

Mailing Address:      82 College Circle

                              Dahlonega, GA 30597

 

706-867-2558 (Office)

678-485-1765 (Cell)

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Hornsby, Eunice
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 8:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [acupa-l] Editing or Revising policies versus procedures

 

Hello all.

 

For those of you who have a combined document - policy and procedure -
do you allow separate update dates (edit, revision) for each of those
sections (policy/procedure), or when a document is updated, do you
change both dates?  In the past, we've had folks update both dates, and
I'm leaning towards going the other way.  So I figured I'd ask to see if
there is a "usual" practice out there.

 

-Eunice

Eunice Hornsby, Ph.D. 
Policy and Training Director
The Ohio State University
Office of University Compliance and Integrity 
1543 N. High St., Columbus, OH 43201-2190
614-292-8728 Office
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  compliance.osu.edu
<http://compliance.osu.edu>  osu.edu/policies/
<http://www.osu.edu/policies/>   

 

 

ATTN: Please be aware that when you respond to an ACUPA-L e-mail, the
reply will be distributed to the ENTIRE e-listing of members. If you do
NOT want to send an e-mail to everyone, please reply directly to the
individual who initiated the query (their e-mail address appears in the
"From" line of their original e-mail). 

If you wish to remove yourself from the ACUPA e-mail list, please go to
this web address and fill out the form. We will remove you from the list
within 24 hours during normal business hours. 

http://www.acupa.org/MembershipForm_Discontinue.html 

ATTN: Please be aware that when you respond to an ACUPA-L e-mail, the
reply will be distributed to the ENTIRE e-listing of members. If you do
NOT want to send an e-mail to everyone, please reply directly to the
individual who initiated the query (their e-mail address appears in the
"From" line of their original e-mail). 

If you wish to remove yourself from the ACUPA e-mail list, please go to
this web address and fill out the form. We will remove you from the list
within 24 hours during normal business hours. 

http://www.acupa.org/MembershipForm_Discontinue.html 

________________________________

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4355 / Virus Database: 3882/7350 - Release Date:
04/16/14

<<image001.png>>

Reply via email to