In a message dated 2/28/09 1:15:16 AM, [email protected] writes:
> Please quote me accurately. I didn't say "good and bad qualities." I > wrote, "such as qualities that can be evaluated as 'good' in a work" > and "The raw material that leads to 'good' and 'bad' predicates reside > in the objects." > Michael, check your posting of 1:15 am on Feb 28. The following is a copy-and-paste from that posting: "I believe it is possible to speak of good and bad qualities in things, and these qualities are independent of the perceiver's/interpreter's set of standards for such things. They raw material that leads to "good" and "bad" predicates reside in the objects, not exclusively in our heads." ************** You're invited to Hollywood's biggest party: Get Oscars updates, red carpet pics and more at Moviefone. (http://movies.aol.com/oscars-academy-awards?ncid=emlcntusmovi00000001)
