In a message dated 2/27/09 3:05:17 PM, [email protected] writes:
> I should say these are not mere devil's advocate arguments. I sincerely > believe these things. The very things in Johnson or Shakespeare that give me > > pleasure might bore or disgust the next person. "Well, you shouldn't be > bored! You > should be transported like me! And if I am transported, it can only be > because > there is good art there. Thus do I prove good art exists!" > In the course of denying that it is possible to say something is "good art" you have assumed that "good art" is not boring or disgusting,that it transports one, and that it gives pleasure. Explain please. Kate Sullivan ************** Get a jump start on your taxes. Find a tax professional in your neighborhood today. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=Tax+Return+Preparation+%26+Filing&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000004)
