Yeah, noooo more fiberglass dishes. We only use the metal ones from KP
and they have the correct holder for them.
On 10/03/2018 12:58 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Yes, I meant the 5 GHz version. It’s just that the 450b has higher
xmt power than other 5 GHz variants, higher I think than the 3.65 SM,
so I’m not sure why the 3.65 SM needs cooling fins. Maybe just to
justify the higher price? It’s a pain when putting it in the 27RD
fiberglass reflector dishes because it doesn’t fit in the holder. It
does look fancy though.
*From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Dave
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 3, 2018 12:41 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux noob
I have not seen a PMP450b in 3.65 yet?
Keep in mind the power issue is only related to the PMP450M 3.65 not
the 5Ghz one.
On 10/03/2018 12:25 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Well, so much for just swapping out a 450i AP for a 450m AP using
the same cabling. Cambium always seems to enjoy making our lives
difficult. So we have to keep changing our wiring and powering
schemes as we go from 100 series to 430, 450, 450i, and 450m. Yikes.
I wonder if the 3.65 version uses more power because of higher
regulatory xmt power, either as a Part 90 device or in the future
as a Part 96 device?
I’ve never quite figured out why a 3.65 SM is heavy and has
cooling fins on the back, yet a 450b mid gain SM I think has
higher xmt power and fits in the antenna feedtube.
*From:*AF <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Dave
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 3, 2018 11:28 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux noob
Forrest,
I have learned that specifically the 3.6Ghz Medusa doesnt do POE
at all. It only accepts direct dc hookup.
Which leads me to this question since it also needs sync and
requires cmm5 can I still use the packetflux rack injector unit
to provide the sync needed since it is the same as the CMM5 just
no POE.
I am sure someone from cambium could enlighten us if I am
incorrect on this.
Thanks
Dave
On 10/03/2018 10:28 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
I have the new 3.65 medusa on my mind.... plus I'm a bit tired.
The 48V 2.5A power supplies will run 2 non 3.65 medusa radios
each. If you jumper the boards so 2 radios run off of each
power supply you'll be fine (the AF24 is a similar quantity of
power).
But, a bulk supply is probably a better idea if you can find
one in your right form factor.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:07 AM Eric Muehleisen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I've been using CTM2's for nearly a decade, but they do
not support 450m. CMM5 is waaay to expensive for what it
does and is clunky. I've been looking at Packetflux's
RackInjector's.
I'm not familiar with PacketFlux products and need clarity
on something. See attached. I need to power (3) 450m AP's
and a(1) AF24. I also need physical spares for each unit.
Is the attached parts list correct or am I missing something?
Thanks!
--
AF mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
*Forrest Christian*/CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT
59602
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/>
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
<http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
--
--
--
--
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
