Forrest,
 I have learned that specifically the 3.6Ghz Medusa doesnt do POE at all. It only accepts direct dc hookup. Which leads me to this question since it also needs sync and requires cmm5 can I still use the packetflux rack injector unit
to provide the sync needed since it is the same as the CMM5 just no POE.

I am sure someone from cambium could enlighten us if I am incorrect on this.
Thanks
Dave


On 10/03/2018 10:28 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
I have the new 3.65 medusa on my mind.... plus I'm a bit tired.

The 48V 2.5A power supplies will run 2 non 3.65 medusa radios each. If you jumper the boards so 2 radios run off of each power supply you'll be fine (the AF24 is a similar quantity of power).

But, a bulk supply is probably a better idea if you can find one in your right form factor.



On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:07 AM Eric Muehleisen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I've been using CTM2's for nearly a decade, but they do not
    support 450m. CMM5 is waaay to expensive for what it does and is
    clunky. I've been looking at Packetflux's RackInjector's.

    I'm not familiar with PacketFlux products and need clarity on
    something. See attached. I need to power (3) 450m AP's and a(1)
    AF24. I also need physical spares for each unit. Is the attached
    parts list correct or am I missing something?

    Thanks!
-- AF mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>





--
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to