No this is a girl from KY.  

From: Cassidy B. Larson 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 12:55 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political

Is that the daughter in law who lives in the UK?  If so, wondering if location 
sways her views at all. 



  On Jul 20, 2020, at 12:18 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:

  I love arguing with my kids.  I will pick any position or even swap sides mid 
argument.  Their spouses have finally figured out that I just love the debate.  
But the main thing I get out of it is exposure the new ideas.  They get a dose 
of reality.  One daughter in law refused to believe that one could exist on 
$1000/month.  They one of my sons informed her that he lived on less than that 
for several years.  Same daughter in law thought I should be paying all my 
employees a minimum wage of $15.  I told her that most of my employees do make 
that or more, but entry level jobs would not exist if they had to do so.  Then 
she got on me for paying so low the employees could not afford healthcare.  I 
informed her that we do provide health care.  She stopped talking for a few 
minutes that afternoon...

  From: Brian Webster
  Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 12:10 PM
  To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political

  I didn’t assume that you were Adam. I pose questions or viewpoints for the 
wider audience. Too often I am seeing polarizing views all over from people who 
have never stopped to quietly consider the other side or multiple sides to an 
issue. Put the shoe on the other foot has been lost as a concept. The instant 
gratification society has lost their ability to have a little pause and 
consider mentality (part of getting old I guess). Whenever I have a chance to 
politely discuss situations with others and pose some other possibilities in a 
situation, most people will be courteous and say I guess I had never considered 
that point, or I was not aware of that fact. When I also listen to their 
perspective on the same topic it gives me other points to think about that I 
may not have known or thought about. I am not one to have any illusions that I 
can change a person’s beliefs or core values, but I do try and at least get a 
person to pause and try to consider a different viewpoint or facts. I have no 
aspirations or delusions that  I can get people to think the way I do or 
believe that I am right on any particular topic. My upbringing and life 
experiences form a different outlook than any other person and I believe every 
other person I meet has experienced life in their own way that forms their own 
outlook.
   
  Wow I am sounding like some old coger rocking on the porch……..
   
  Thank you,
  Brian Webster
   
  From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
  Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 1:49 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political
   
  I would definitely not approve of a CHAZ/CHOP type thing in my neighborhood.  
I'm not sure what I would do about it.  I suppose I'd probably show up to their 
meetings and say bad things to them.  Then they'd call me a fascist or 
something.  We'd have to see where it went from there.

  The executive order I referred to was signed by the president on June 26th.  
It was titled  “Protecting American Monuments, Memorials, and Statues and 
Combating Recent Criminal Activity"

  I don't know what those federal agencies did in the absence of that specific 
order.  Maybe they waited for an order?

  Please don't think I'm outraged.  Quite the opposite.  I don't think anything 
could possibly outrage me anymore because I'm sick and tired of outrage.









  On 7/20/2020 1:32 PM, Brian Webster wrote:
Is that all they are doing? I do not know and do not expect anyone who is not 
directly involved in the activities to know at this stage, but it is very 
plausible that they are doing what is within their authority. Speculation by 
the media is not in itself reason either. Fact is people should do their due 
diligence and try to find out their own facts. Leaving that job up to a 
journalist and hanging your hat, opinion, and perception on a journalist these 
days probably not the wisest plan of action. But if a person wants to have an 
echo chamber opinion, they should go ahead and pick the media outlet that 
supports their point of view and stick with them. All media outlets these days 
have a major bias like we have never seen before. One side or the other, 
doesn't matter. Journalistic integrity is not what it used to be yet it would 
seem most of society is quick to question everything and everyone except the 
media.  I know that if I lived in this area I would expect my constitutional 
rights to be protected as a citizen with freedom of movement in those 
neighborhoods and have access to my place of business or residence. A 
government letting a whole region of a city be taken over like what happened in 
Seattle is absurd. That was an invasion and take over plain and simple. 
Protests are one thing, occupying a place and keeping cops out and not having 
100% agreement by all those in the occupied area is nothing short than an act 
of war and at minimum domestic terrorism. Plain and simple. If you do not 
believe that, seriously ask yourself if you would be ok if that happened to you 
on your own property or property you own for your place of business. That is a 
hostage/kidnap situation. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of your own happiness 
has been taken away. Blocking you from police, fire or EMS protection is 
shameful and illegal. Any politician that does not look at things that way is a 
puppet and hypocrite, especially when they have their own guards and security 
protecting them. At least in Portland the Feds starting not to allow that to 
happen in the Federal park or give them any more base of operations to try and 
accomplish that in that city. The word "occupy" is always thrown around by 
pacifists in a different context about our worldwide military presence than how 
they support it for these types of protests, it's not any different in 
definition on our own soil even if you do agree with the political position or 
cause. No other person should be able to take control like that and deny you 
the rights you are provided in this country.  I guess my point is, don't let 
just one type of information intake form your outrage. Speak to others that may 
have different input and knowledge (but please do it in a civil way and with 
the intent to listen not just answer back). This Portland situation likely 
started from just clearing the park and then massive outrage flames were fanned 
based on people not realizing that they were on federal land in the first place 
and those officers were there to protect the property and enforce those laws. 
Executive orders......not a fan of them. They can easily be misused and usually 
a plan of last resort when there is political deadlock. An executive order that 
says protect federal property? I would expect that every federal officer knows 
that is their job. Heck every military person knows that is their job. The 
first general order of a sentry is "to take charge of this post and all 
government property in view". Was it an actual executive order issued or was it 
more of a memo with the president reminding people that is what needs to be 
done. Rioting and tearing down statues and defacing federal (and by default 
taxpayer) property seems very divisive at this point. Letting things devolve to 
more than that when the group has "Occupy" in their name and cause should be 
treated as such and not considered just a protest. Their intent is stated in 
the name. Thank you,Brian Webster  -----Original Message-----From: AF 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam MoffettSent: Monday, July 
20, 2020 12:55 PMTo: [email protected]: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political It 
doesn't all stem from clearing a park.  That might not be what you're trying to 
say, but it could be read that way. The reason people are pointing a finger at 
the current administration is there was an executive order signed a few weeks 
ago ordering federal agencies to protect federal property, and that seems to be 
a direct response to the ongoing protests.  They can bring in this variety of 
agencies because the Homeland Security Act of 2002 allows them to deputize 
other federal agents to assist: 
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/politics/federal-agents-portland-arrests.html
 So the justification is protecting federal property, but is that all they're 
doing?  No political motivations of any kind here? And while I'm sure that they 
have the legal authority for all of this, isn't it ok to ask whether they 
should?   On 7/20/2020 12:04 PM, Brian Webster wrote:In Portland part of the 
protest and occupy movement protesters were trying to camp out in a FEDERAL 
PARK downtown. This attempt to occupy federal property has not happened in 
other cities that I am aware of and hence the different agencies involved. That 
Park director requested more federal law enforcement help in getting the people 
off the park grounds and not allow them to camp there. This was not a case of 
the black helicopters coming and federal officers taking over local law 
enforcement authority from the locals. If was Federal Law Enforcement 
protecting federal property. In ALL law enforcement agencies it is not unusual 
for plain clothes officers, detectives etc. to have unmarked vehicles and use 
them when making arrests. This is hardly unusual police activity if you look at 
the whole picture. Local law enforcement does this type of thing all of the 
time. If these federal officers had identified people who committed a crime on 
federal property and then fled, they are within their law enforcement powers to 
directly pursue and apprehend them even if the apprehension is not on federal 
property. Local and state officers have the same powers. It's not typically 
used but it's not unheard of for say a police officer to pursue someone who 
they believe has committed a felony and cross a state line. That officer is 
fully empowered to make that arrest in the other state. It has happened many 
times and the laws have been upheld to allow for this. There are also still the 
power to effect a citizen's arrest as well. Nobody likes to do it because it 
gets messy legally after the fact but that is still allowed in this country. 
Before people get outraged at what the press is telling them is happening, they 
should take a step back and gather their own facts and knowledge and not be so 
quick to accept some "experts" statements. You all know how bad a journalist 
can butcher up a technical article on stuff we do and work with, what makes us 
think they are any smarter in the field of law or medicine? 
https://kval.com/news/local/police-remove-occupy-portland-campers-from-park?fbclid=IwAR0dSQqKXj_ikwqmSfvMvvPtOVoFVhGjwrH126Lhiomx3iZXlxTUGtT2S7E
 "This morning, at request and at the lead of the US Federal Protective 
Service, the Portland Police helped remove campers at Shrunk Plaza, which is 
federal property across the street from Chapman Square," Adams wrote. "The 
campers who were arrested - an estimated 8 to 10 people - at Shrunk Plaza were 
detained by federal police and cited under US federal law. Initial reports 
indicate arrests were completed in a peaceful manner."   Thank you,Brian 
Webster  -----Original Message-----From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ken HohhofSent: Monday, July 20, 2020 11:41 AMTo: 'AnimalFarm 
Microwave Users Group'Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political I don't think I'd 
like it if Obama had dispatched federal troops to "Republican-led cities" 
claiming they are stupidly and conservatively run. It also doesn't make me 
comfortable having Ken Cuccinelli driving this.  Not a guy who should have the 
power to send troops to your city for political reasons, or any reason.  Andy 
Taylor would make him keep his one bullet in his shirt pocket.  -----Original 
Message-----From: AF mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Larry 
SmithSent: Monday, July 20, 2020 10:20 AMTo: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
mailto:[email protected]: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political The US Border Patrol 
is a part of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. --Larry 
[email protected] On Mon July 20 2020 10:14, Ken Hohhof wrote:I thought I 
read they admitted to being Customs & Border Patrol, atleast in Portland.  But 
yes other reports say that a force wasassembled from various federal agencies 
so maybe also US Marshals.   They have been using border patrol in questionable 
ways for awhile,like setting up roadblocks on highways hundreds of miles from 
any border.     From: AF mailto:[email protected] On Behalf Of Bill 
PrinceSent: Monday, July 20, 2020 9:56 AMTo: [email protected]: Re: 
[AFMUG] OT - political   The National Guard is a state resource. I think he can 
request it, butI'm not sure he can command it. What I read, they were US 
Marshals, and other unidentified federalresources. 
bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>  On 7/20/2020 7:41 AM, [email protected] 
mailto:[email protected]  wrote: Yeah, you gotta wonder what their orders were. 
Doesn’t a president normally activate the National Guard when extrahelp is 
needed? These guys were – what?  Homeland Security?  ICE?   From: Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 8:35 AM To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - political   Hitler tactics by Bunker Boy...there , I 
said it.   On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 2:49 PM <[email protected]mailto:[email protected] 
>wrote: Not trying to break lent, but I am lacking understanding.   What are 
the young white kids rioting about in Portland?   I am from Oregon, I remember 
protests in the 60s and 70s over Vietnam.I also remember a line of State Police 
walking through a park downtownand busting heads of those that did not clear 
out.  Actually one of myfirst telco bosses had been one of those State Bull 
Cops.   Are young white kids just aching for a chance at anarchy?  I don’t get 
it. Misbehaving while trying to wrap some kind of noble cause around youis 
pretty childish. --AF mailing [email protected] 
mailto:[email protected]://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com     
_____--AF mailing 
[email protected]http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com     

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  -- 
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to