Nope, they're targeting the left now. Turns out it wasnt ever about trump
in Portland nor BLM. Which is why all that started under the nations first
black president. Sow the seeds of divisiveness and you shall reap those
rewards, plentifully. Epic, simply epic. Electing the king and queen of
locking black folks up, will be rewarded to the white elitists as expected.

It's going to be a humorous 2 years

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020, 8:41 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> I wonder, have the Portland riots magically ceased?
>
> *From:* Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2020 7:38 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Silence is deafening..
>
> isnt it amazing the difference between a direct quote and enemy media
> spin?
>
> doesnt matter, leftist wingbats dont care, those tools still say trump
> called all mexicans rapists, mental prowess isnt one of their strengths
>
> same with 100s of pieces of mail not equating more than a single unknown
> ballot
>
> "we gottem this time for sure" says the zealots in the helmets on both
> teams as the load into their shortbusses
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 8:34 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Here's the Washington Examiner covering the same order
>> <https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/barr-authorizes-doj-to-look-into-only-substantial-allegations-of-voting-irregularities-in-the-2020-election?utm_medium=email&_hsmi=99440973&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9McecxSafWgTD0JAgy75Ycqh-CxkGtU1L_k5rrFjTXv_X0Xfcf0wuZqjujFnO5R0kd40qa3voIH8QbjU8VStyMcKPKNQ&utm_content=99440973&utm_source=hs_email>by
>> Barr.  There's a very different tone here.  It sounds as if the order was
>> intended to limit the scope of investigations to only situations where the
>> allegation seems plausible and the scale of the alleged fraud could have
>> actually affected the outcome of an election.
>>
>> Quote from Bill Barr's order, requoted from above article:
>>
>> ""You are the most senior leaders in the United States Department of
>> Justice and I trust you to exercise great care and judgment in addressing
>> allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities. While serious
>> allegations should be handled with great care, specious, speculative,
>> fanciful, or far-fetched claims should not be a basis for initiating
>> federal inquiries.””
>>
>>
>> On 11/9/2020 7:38 PM, justsumname wrote:
>>
>> this thing is just getting started, gents.   It's only Monday.
>>
>>
>> https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-ag-barr-authorizes-federal-prosecutors-pursue-substantial-allegations-voting-irregularities-2020-election-certified/
>>
>> RealClearPolitics un-calls Pennsylvania for Biden.   The state is grey on
>> their map, now.   Was Blue yesterday.
>>
>> I do not understand the vitriol against Mr Trump.   He's been an
>> excellent President for all Americans.
>> No I didn't ask... I can read everyone's comments, and I have.   For
>> years.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:16 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I wish they could invent a secure method to vote online.  But it has to
>>> be resistant to buying and selling votes.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2020, at 3:52 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> It's pretty straight forward to verify integrity of the vote. We have
>>> already dont it with covid test results. We are blind ballot meaning no one
>>> can see who you voted for. Covid result eliminated anyone's ability to
>>> claim their vote was stolen or manipulated since you can check your results
>>> with your code. You can do the same without recording a name.
>>> If there is any question of validity in a count, it can be verified,
>>> fairly quickly.
>>>
>>> Covid built us a system to have a secure vote. Inadvertant side effects
>>> are the best side effects.
>>> You register, you are assigned your key. Your registration can be
>>> verified legitimate. You can even vote online. The tracing infrastructure
>>> can be used to canvass a contested district for verification of vote
>>> accuracy.
>>>
>>> This is the last election where fraud can be claimed... inadvertant, as
>>> is most of the left's mistakes
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020, 12:20 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The advantage to that is that the records will probably last a long
>>>> time. OTOH, storage might become an issue.
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/9/2020 10:16 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In our county, we have to quarry a stone tablet, cart it down to the
>>>> office, make an X with a tar crayon, and be able to lift on to the ballet
>>>> cart to have the vote count.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 10:10 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Our county typically uses touchscreen machines for in-person voting,
>>>>> both early and day-of.  (A paper tape record is also printed out and can 
>>>>> be
>>>>> verified by the voter)  Obviously these are very quick to process.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Early voting sites were open for 15 days prior to the election.  In
>>>>> addition, there was one early voting site open 40 days prior to the
>>>>> election, but it used paper ballots.  Basically you filled out the same
>>>>> form as a mail-in ballot, sealed it, and dropped it in a box.  That’s how 
>>>>> I
>>>>> voted and I was disappointed that was the process, I thought they would
>>>>> scan them through a “tabulator” as the last step, just like back when we
>>>>> used paper ballots for day-of voting.  I expected as the last step before
>>>>> leaving I would feed the paper ballot into a scanner.  Instead I sealed it
>>>>> in an envelope and dropped it in a box.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All the paper ballots including early in-person and mail-in were
>>>>> required to sit in the locked boxes until something like 7am on election
>>>>> day before they could start processing them.  This was apparently also the
>>>>> case in many battleground states.  They weren’t even allowed to open the
>>>>> envelopes, uncrease the forms, check signatures, nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 9, 2020 9:52 AM
>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Silence is deafening..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In our county (and I have no idea if this is the norm in the rest of
>>>>> the state), they count them as they come in, but hold the results in a
>>>>> secure area until the close of the in-person polls. Ballots that are
>>>>> postmarked (if they were mailed) up until the day of the election will be
>>>>> accepted for a certain amount of time, but I don't know how long that is.
>>>>>
>>>>> We also have an online ballot tracking system. After we dropped our
>>>>> ballots off, we could go to a ballot status web site that told us (1) if
>>>>> the ballot had been received, and (2) if it had been accepted. It took 48
>>>>> hours for our ballots to show up in that system. I presume if our ballots
>>>>> had not been accepted, there is some sort of mechanism to go fix that, but
>>>>> I've never had to use it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>>
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/9/2020 7:25 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, some states are doing exactly that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Adam Moffett
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 9, 2020 8:09 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Silence is deafening..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Scan them as they go, but don't publish the ongoing count.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/8/2020 4:45 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think vote by mail and scan them as they arrive is the way to go.
>>>>> That way when the polls close you have an immediate count.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Bill Prince
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 8, 2020 2:38 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Silence is deafening..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole punch card voting "system"  was doomed from the beginning. I
>>>>> remember using it when I lived in Santa Clara County  30 years ago or so.
>>>>> Even when you punched out a hole properly, the chads would sometime stick
>>>>> or hang on a corner.
>>>>>
>>>>> For quite some time now, we've been using the paper ballots where you
>>>>> fill in the square or the circle.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've also been registered as a permanent absentee for over a decade.
>>>>> When I voted (almost a month ago now), we filled out our ballots at the
>>>>> kitchen counter, and took them to a drop box the next day when we were
>>>>> running errands in town. The actual act of "voting" (if you want to call 
>>>>> it
>>>>> that) took less than 1 minute as we just dropped the ballots off at one of
>>>>> dozens of drop boxes all over the county.Our county has (IIRC) 39 drop
>>>>> boxes for a population of ~~ 750,000, or about 1 drop box for every 20,000
>>>>> people.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pennsylvania still hasn't started counting the late arrival absentee
>>>>> ballots. All of the ones they've counted so far arrived before November 3,
>>>>> but for reasons I don't understand were not allowed to be counted until
>>>>> after the day-of voting. From the things I've read, there are only about
>>>>> 85,000 of them, and they are unlikely to do anything but extend Biden's
>>>>> cushion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I (for one) would be in favor of uniform voting/counting standards.
>>>>> Perhaps it would be a violation of state's rights, but on the other hand,
>>>>> there would be a lot less confusion when the time for voting comes around.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>>
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/8/2020 11:08 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop the vote in Pennsylvania but keep counting in Arizona.  It’s a
>>>>> Maxwell’s Demon approach.  Open the door when it helps me, close the door
>>>>> when it helps the other guy.
>>>>>
>>>>> That’s probably why the Supremes stopped the recounts in Bush v Gore,
>>>>> the Gore camp wanted to keep looking for errors but only in the counties
>>>>> where they thought it would help them.  But also the votes had already 
>>>>> been
>>>>> counted (and recounted).  And there was the original Florida Man, some guy
>>>>> named Hanging Chad?  And the phone call and the retraction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Democrats to this day take it as gospel that Gore was robbed.  That
>>>>> does not bode well for half the country moving on from this election.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 8, 2020 12:02 PM
>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Silence is deafening..
>>>>>
>>>>> In Michigan we're demanding a recount. In Wisconsin we're demanding a
>>>>> decount. In Georgia it's opposites day.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LmFVEi5Jd0
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>>
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/7/2020 8:27 PM, justsumname wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The declaration that Biden has won is premature.   This thing hasn't
>>>>> really gotten started yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Judges don't hold court on the weekends.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 6:40 PM Jaime Solorza <
>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes good movie.
>>>>>
>>>>> More akin to today is Seven Days in May...March, Douglas, Lancaster...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020, 4:22 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Founding Fathers didn’t account for the rise of political parties,
>>>>> which came soon enough.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College#Original_plan
>>>>>
>>>>> Somehow I’m reminded of the movie The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.
>>>>> Set in the fading days of the old west with territories becoming states 
>>>>> and
>>>>> deciding who to elect as their representatives.  Should it be Jimmy 
>>>>> Stewart
>>>>> the righteous lawyer, or Lee Marvin the outlaw gang leader?  The old
>>>>> fashioned idea that you sent the brightest and best educated person to
>>>>> Washington to represent you.  Hah!  Politicians are not held in great
>>>>> esteem today, and we would probably vote for Liberty Valance.  I assume
>>>>> everyone has seen the movie.  It’s an old John Ford western, in fact he
>>>>> shot it in B&W, but it’s a must see.  Look at the cast – Jimmy Stewart,
>>>>> John Wayne, Lee Marvin, Vera Miles, Andy Devine, Edmond O’Brien, John
>>>>> Caradine, Lee Van Cleef.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:46 PM
>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: The Silence is deafening..
>>>>>
>>>>> The three-fifths compromise was enacted long before California existed.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-fifths_Compromise
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>>
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/7/2020 12:54 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Uhhhh. No. The EC was created so that California has the same voice
>>>>> power as Rhode Island.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 7, 2020, at 3:17 PM, Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>> Could have been over on Tuesday if we didn't have the silly Electoral
>>>>> College shenanigans; which actually evolved from the crazy slave is 3/5 of
>>>>> a person nonsense. Here we are ~~ 250 years later and we're still dealing
>>>>> with decisions we made about slaves.
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>>
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/7/2020 11:15 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We have spoken.
>>>>>
>>>>> Righteous Indignation
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lewis Bergman
>>>> 325-439-0533 Cell
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to