We have a running Mike list ;) On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey, hey, hey. > > I may have been very vocal about wanting a change of direction on > something (and countless other things, I'm sure). Wait, do you have a count > there? A whiteboard with tally marks for each time I've been "bold" > regarding some UBNT position or product? Hrm.. Anyway, but I also commend > when good and when the one thread kept going after we had the concession > from Robert... I asked everyone (more than once) to close the thread. We > got what we wanted, now shut up. > > As you noticed, I'm like that to other manufacturers a well. ;-) > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Ben Moore via Af" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:36:53 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > Does it matter if he asked? Mike has been naughty this year... ;-) > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:30 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Have you asked Santa? :) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:39 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >> >> I want a bigger AF5. :-\ >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Keefe John via Af" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:36:35 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >> >> Maybe it could be an integrated solution with only one 'dish' vs the >> dogbone design. I'm sure a lot of people would appreciate a smaller >> AF5--even if it had less throughput/distance. >> >> Keefe >> >> On 12/11/2014 8:29 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: >> >> via license? *ducking* >> >> It could be lower end hardware, though I don't know how the costs of >> design and manufacture change. Lower throughput may allow for smaller, >> cheaper processors. Smaller processors use less power, so smaller power >> supply? I'm no engineer, so I can't tell you how much this would or would >> not change the price. >> >> Something that only does 10 MHz wide? >> >> I don't know their cost to manufacture, so I don't know how low they can >> go with the existing hardware and still make money. >> >> >> >> On the license front, I think people don't like the Cambium license >> system because the base unit is too slow and there are too many units. I >> think Gino's got something with a $1k 200 meg unit. Would be great for >> (business) customer installs. Maybe just one license to go from Lite to >> Full? Two things to keep track of, not several. >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Gino Villarini via Af" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:20:01 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >> >> I asked this and got a negative response… UBNT should work o AF24 2 >> with 1 Gig capacity and a AF24Lite for 200-500 Mbps capacity for $1k link >> >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> President >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> www.aeronetpr.com >> @aeronetpr >> >> >> >> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 9:27 AM >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >> >> Could they increase the QAM on the current AF24 to match that of the >> AF5 and at least do 1 gigabit FDX on the current shipping hardware? Not >> sure how increasing QAM levels work in FPGA land. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Colin Stanners via Af" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:19:46 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >> >> I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the >> 100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit >> backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well. >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd guess there's going to be... a least 3 AirFiber products released >>> in the next 12-18 months. >>> >>> If not sooner. >>> >>> Now... what would those be? >>> >>> Hrmmmmmmmmm..... >>> >>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>> >>> On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: >>> >>> I don’t know what you are talking about. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds via Af >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding) is >>> silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing nothing. >>> >>> :P >>> >>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>> >>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>> >>> On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: >>> >>> I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all the 802.11ac >>> vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules. The 450 is able to provide a >>> better performance within the new environment so there will still be a >>> differentiator. The only question if it’s worth the difference. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt via Af >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM >>> *To:* Josh Luthman via Af >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >>> >>> >>> >>> .AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or not. Others >>> do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to keep customers and >>> applications where 450 does not meet the price point. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 04:00 >>> *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether Cambium would >>> be >>> fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a company do >>> when >>> it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one starts to >>> outshine >>> the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark? (mbps - even .AC >>> ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc). >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac. >>> > >>> > >>> > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 01:39 >>> > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > I hope Cambium is listing on this point. >>> > >>> > Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at 10 meg >>> price >>> > point. >>> > >>> > They are about to have more competition from lot of other vendors too. >>> > >>> > Tushar >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On >>> Behalf Of Peter Kranz via Af >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >>> > >>> > > Yes no maybe. >>> > >>> > I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light the >>> competitive >>> > fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of speed >>> licenses. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >
