I imagine it also has my name/face with a lot of holes from darts.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Aaron Schneider via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > So do we. :D > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore via Af > *Sent:* Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:48 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > We have a whole wall for you... ;) > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh god has my white board turned into a black board? > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ben Moore via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have a running Mike list ;) > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey, hey, hey. > > I may have been very vocal about wanting a change of direction on > something (and countless other things, I'm sure). Wait, do you have a count > there? A whiteboard with tally marks for each time I've been "bold" > regarding some UBNT position or product? Hrm.. Anyway, but I also commend > when good and when the one thread kept going after we had the concession > from Robert... I asked everyone (more than once) to close the thread. We > got what we wanted, now shut up. > > As you noticed, I'm like that to other manufacturers a well. ;-) > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Ben Moore via Af" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:36:53 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > Does it matter if he asked? Mike has been naughty this year... ;-) > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:30 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Have you asked Santa? :) > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Sent:* Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:39 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > I want a bigger AF5. :-\ > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Keefe John via Af" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:36:35 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > Maybe it could be an integrated solution with only one 'dish' vs the > dogbone design. I'm sure a lot of people would appreciate a smaller > AF5--even if it had less throughput/distance. > > Keefe > > On 12/11/2014 8:29 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote: > > via license? *ducking* > > It could be lower end hardware, though I don't know how the costs of > design and manufacture change. Lower throughput may allow for smaller, > cheaper processors. Smaller processors use less power, so smaller power > supply? I'm no engineer, so I can't tell you how much this would or would > not change the price. > > Something that only does 10 MHz wide? > > I don't know their cost to manufacture, so I don't know how low they can > go with the existing hardware and still make money. > > > > On the license front, I think people don't like the Cambium license system > because the base unit is too slow and there are too many units. I think > Gino's got something with a $1k 200 meg unit. Would be great for (business) > customer installs. Maybe just one license to go from Lite to Full? Two > things to keep track of, not several. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Gino Villarini via Af" <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:20:01 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > I asked this and got a negative response… UBNT should work o AF24 2 with 1 > Gig capacity and a AF24Lite for 200-500 Mbps capacity for $1k link > > > > > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > President > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > www.aeronetpr.com > > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > > *From: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 9:27 AM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > Could they increase the QAM on the current AF24 to match that of the AF5 > and at least do 1 gigabit FDX on the current shipping hardware? Not sure > how increasing QAM levels work in FPGA land. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Colin Stanners via Af" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:19:46 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the > 100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit > backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well. > > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'd guess there's going to be... a least 3 AirFiber products released in > the next 12-18 months. > > If not sooner. > > Now... what would those be? > > Hrmmmmmmmmm..... > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: > > I don’t know what you are talking about. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding) is > silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing nothing. > > :P > > josh reynolds :: chief information officer > > spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com > > On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: > > I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all the 802.11ac > vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules. The 450 is able to provide a > better performance within the new environment so there will still be a > differentiator. The only question if it’s worth the difference. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM > *To:* Josh Luthman via Af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > .AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or not. Others > do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to keep customers and > applications where 450 does not meet the price point. > > > > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 04:00 > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > > > > An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether Cambium would be > fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a company do when > it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one starts to outshine > the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark? (mbps - even .AC > ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc). > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac. > > > > > > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 01:39 > > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> > > > > I hope Cambium is listing on this point. > > > > Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at 10 meg price > > point. > > > > They are about to have more competition from lot of other vendors too. > > > > Tushar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On Behalf > Of Peter Kranz via Af > > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > > > Yes no maybe. > > > > I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light the > competitive > > fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of speed > licenses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
