We have looked at this, but alignment would be a real issue (and ensuring proper separation, etc...)...We are still kicking around some different options. Though we are getting a lot of good feedback already on long links with AF5.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Eric Kuhnke via Af <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like a pro grade AF5 connectorized, for use with a pair of the 3' > Jirous high performance antennas. Each link would need 4 dishes but you'd > be able to go a lot further than the current af5 antenna size. > On Dec 10, 2014 10:05 PM, "Mathew Howard via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> PtMP based on the airfiber in 3.65ghz would seem like a good fit, with >> the new rules that are (hopefully) coming... >> >> licensed also seems like an obvious place to go with airfiber. >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Af [[email protected]] on behalf of Josh Reynolds via Af [ >> [email protected]] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:42 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >> >> I'd be incredibly surprised if they didn't do a ptmp. >> >> Not sure a revamped 24GHz is in consideration when there's so many other >> bands they could release equipment for. >> >> Maybe licensed? Hrmmmm... >> >> One can hope, right? >> >> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >> >> On 12/10/2014 08:19 PM, Colin Stanners via Af wrote: >> >> I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the >> 100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit >> backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well. >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd guess there's going to be... a least 3 AirFiber products released >>> in the next 12-18 months. >>> >>> If not sooner. >>> >>> Now... what would those be? >>> >>> Hrmmmmmmmmm..... >>> >>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>> >>> On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: >>> >>> I don’t know what you are talking about. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds via Af >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding) is >>> silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing nothing. >>> >>> :P >>> >>> josh reynolds :: chief information officer >>> >>> spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com >>> >>> On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: >>> >>> I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all the 802.11ac >>> vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules. The 450 is able to provide a >>> better performance within the new environment so there will still be a >>> differentiator. The only question if it’s worth the difference. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt via Af >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM >>> *To:* Josh Luthman via Af >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >>> >>> >>> >>> .AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or not. Others >>> do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to keep customers and >>> applications where 450 does not meet the price point. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 04:00 >>> *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether Cambium would >>> be >>> fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a company do >>> when >>> it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one starts to >>> outshine >>> the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark? (mbps - even .AC >>> ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc). >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac. >>> > >>> > >>> > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 01:39 >>> > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > I hope Cambium is listing on this point. >>> > >>> > Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at 10 meg >>> price >>> > point. >>> > >>> > They are about to have more competition from lot of other vendors too. >>> > >>> > Tushar >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On >>> Behalf Of Peter Kranz via Af >>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. >>> > >>> > > Yes no maybe. >>> > >>> > I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light the >>> competitive >>> > fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of speed >>> licenses. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>
