I think George is young as well, but I've never met him, only Cesare and Larry 
(though obviously Larry isn't there anymore). 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Mark Radabaugh via Af" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:23:58 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 


Um... who are you calling old? Josh just started shaving last week. (Ok - I'm 
kidding, but I'm pretty sure he is under 30). 


And dammit - I've earned the right to be a crotchety old man and screw it - I'm 
going to enjoy it. 


Mark 






On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:13 PM, Mike Hammett via Af < [email protected] > wrote: 


Canopy guys seem to like it one way and one way only. Crotchety old men... 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Luthman via Af" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:10:43 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 


What exactly is the problem with adding tools to make it easier to access??? 
Just add the features that people want, if you don't like 'em don't use 'em! 


</thread> 






Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Mark Radabaugh via Af < [email protected] > wrote: 
<blockquote>


Because we install 10, 15, sometimes 20 CPE a day. It's a pain in the ass 
having to McGiver your way into them every time. Sure we auto-configure a lot 
of it, but there are still have to get into them to look at signal strength and 
such during the install or when troubleshooting. 


Mark 




<blockquote>

On Dec 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Mike Hammett via Af < [email protected] > wrote: 


Why do you need to access CPE that aren't directly accessible multiple times a 
day? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Ken Hohhof via Af" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:06:44 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 




But I don’t think he’s talking how a skilled person could MacGyver it, but 
rather a session list right there in the GUI with every subscriber listed by 
name, and you click on the name and shazzam, you are logged into that SM. 

Like one of many things that pisses me off about my $10K Purewave basestation 
is you can see a list of CPE MAC addresses by subscriber name, but if you want 
to see any stats or change the config for that subscriber, you have to find him 
by his MAC address, not by name. The expensive piece of crap equipment has all 
the information to make your life easy, but no, it acts like a glorified MIB 
browser. They even rolled out an NMS that I assumed would add this level of 
intelligence, but no. 

So yes in a pinch you could probably get there through some MAC telnet tricks. 
But with the AP proxy feature, it’s one click and boom. If you don’t find it 
useful, fine. Most of us use it multiple times every day. It’s a cool feature. 





From: Mathew Howard via Af 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:50 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 



If there's a mac-telnet package out there for linux, you kind of have to wonder 
why it isn't already in airOS... and ePMP, for that matter. it seems like it 
would be pretty simple to add and incredibly useful. 




From: Af [ [email protected] ] on behalf of Mike Hammett via Af [ 
[email protected] ] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:45 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 




I never really had a need for it. I now no longer have any PMP devices on my 
network. 

Now that I deploy any new Mikrotik wireless either, but if you can get to any 
Mikrotik device on that layer 2 segment, you can get to the rest. Router, AP, 
CPE, doesn't matter. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Steve D via Af" < [email protected] > 
To: "af" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:01:01 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 


Mike, 


You sound like you're trying to excuse it for not being there instead of just 
embracing a good feature that works? Yes, there are ways around, BUT, the 
Canopy AP-SM proxy *just works*. No thinking about how to get to that SM is 
required, if you can get to the AP then you can get to the SM - end of story. 



-Steve D 


On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Mike Hammett via Af < [email protected] > wrote: 
<blockquote>


Use the CLI to fix whatever's wrong with accessing the GUI? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Bill Prince via Af" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:34:41 AM 


Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 


Possibly a little simpler with similar results. It gets you a CLI on the target 
client. The proxy is nice because you can run the web gui. 
--
bp
<part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com> On 12/18/2014 8:03 AM, 
Mike Hammett via Af wrote: 

<blockquote>

With Mikrotik you can mac-telnet or mac-winbox to anything on that layer 2 
segment. That sounds more useful than this proxy. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "Vlad Sedov via Af" mailto:[email protected] 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:11:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 


One thing that makes it so bullet-proof on Canopy, is the internal network 
between the AP and the SMs (169.254.101.x) which is what makes the proxy so 
smooth. With ePMP and UBNT, you're still at the mercy of having the right IP 
address set in the SM before you can manage it (even when connecting from the 
AP). 
We sorely miss this feature in ePMP, and it makes NMS mapping a major 
headache.. We don't pre-map SMs before they go out into the field, so with 
ePMPs, I have to create a static ARP entry for the 192.168.0.2 address in the 
closest Mikrotik router, and use the Tik proxy to get into the SM.. Change IP, 
delete ARP, rinse, repeat. 

Click-through is a cruel joke without the proxy. I really, really hope it gets 
properly implemented. 

Vlad 

On 12/18/2014 7:18 AM, Josh Luthman via Af wrote: 

<blockquote>

How are you doing it with Ubnt? Can't the same be done with epmp? 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Dec 18, 2014 8:06 AM, "Mark Radabaugh via Af" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


For our install method proxy access (or some means of remote access to a 
minimally configured CPE) is a must have. The installers do NOT have to get out 
a computer or otherwise access the device. Power it up, point it at the tower, 
listen for signal, call the office for a signal quality check and go. 
Everything regarding CPE programming can be done remotely. 

This can be done with Ubnt as well by SSH to the AP's and then to the CPE but 
it's not as clean as Canopy. 

No way at all that I know of with ePMP. 

Mark 



<blockquote>

On Dec 17, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Steve D via Af < [email protected] > wrote: 


Use it all the time. Between it and installer color code field techs can't 
FUBAR an install. When our larger networks were vlan'd years ago that made the 
process super safe. 
One of the "best features" of the canopy platform in my book. It annoys me 
working on 802.11 crap when I see a tech has typo'd something like an IP or 
vlan. 
On Dec 17, 2014 7:30 PM, "Bill Prince via Af" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


Me too. 

I don't know how many times I've used it, but it's more than I have finger to 
count on. 

--
bp
<part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com> On 12/17/2014 7:08 PM, 
George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af wrote: 

<blockquote>

No, rather just have it. 

On 12/17/2014 9:07 PM, Josh Luthman via Af wrote: 

<blockquote>

Rather have it and not need it then need it and not have it. 
Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 
On Dec 17, 2014 9:55 PM, "Mike Hammett via Af" < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


I used it a couple times on my Canopy gear, but it was never a show-stopper to 
not have it. 

This brings me to a new post... 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



From: "George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:30:14 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP proxy 

OK Cambium ePMP dudes and chicks, I am disappointed. I thought you guys 
had Canopy-like SM "click-thru" access, aka LUID proxy. But this is not 
the case on 2.3.3. All you give me is a URL with the IP of the SM. 
Informational helpful, yes, operationally helpful, no. 

I'm guessing you need an RF private network like exists on Canopy to 
make this work. Please do it. 




</blockquote>


</blockquote>


</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>

</blockquote>




        
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
www.avast.com 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>

</blockquote>

</blockquote>

</blockquote>


Reply via email to