Hands f-ing down. You need sync for that project. I'd also suggest better sectors (assuming you did the Airmax + RF armor). The key is FTB in this situation. I think the RF elements have gotten good praise in 2.4 GHz.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys, > > We're on a tower with a basically dead WISP that has 3 sectors of 2.4ghz > up there. It's 10 year old equipment so not even sure what brand. Anyway, > we placed 4 sectors of Ubiquiti 2.4 gear on 10 MHz channels with RF Armor > on all sectors. We found that channels 1 and 11 were best so we did channel > 1 on North and south sector and channel 11 on east and west so they're back > to back. The back to back sectors are separated by a solid water tank/tower > but they still see each other at -55 which is hotter than I thought they > would be with Armor and the water tank. > > Anyway, we don't get the best of performance due to self interference as > well as interference from the old WISP equipment. In your experience with > ePMP, would we see a noticeable improvement going to ePMP 2.4 gear and > syncing it all for channel reuse on the back to back sectors? Would this > also give us the added benefit that we would reduce adjacent channel > interference with ourselves because all sectors would transmit and receive > with each other? > > Thank you > > -- > Darin Steffl > Minnesota WiFi > www.mnwifi.com > 507-634-WiFi > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >
