Everything will compared to FSK Canopy, but then again, the throughput is worthless.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Hogg" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:10:34 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Will ePMP work better in heavy interference 2.4ghz Not in our experience...we have not had great success migrating from FSK 100 series to ePMP. Noise floor SNR sucks. Regards, Chuck On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Darin Steffl < [email protected] > wrote: Hey guys, We're on a tower with a basically dead WISP that has 3 sectors of 2.4ghz up there. It's 10 year old equipment so not even sure what brand. Anyway, we placed 4 sectors of Ubiquiti 2.4 gear on 10 MHz channels with RF Armor on all sectors. We found that channels 1 and 11 were best so we did channel 1 on North and south sector and channel 11 on east and west so they're back to back. The back to back sectors are separated by a solid water tank/tower but they still see each other at -55 which is hotter than I thought they would be with Armor and the water tank. Anyway, we don't get the best of performance due to self interference as well as interference from the old WISP equipment. In your experience with ePMP, would we see a noticeable improvement going to ePMP 2.4 gear and syncing it all for channel reuse on the back to back sectors? Would this also give us the added benefit that we would reduce adjacent channel interference with ourselves because all sectors would transmit and receive with each other? Thank you -- Darin Steffl Minnesota WiFi www.mnwifi.com 507-634-WiFi Like us on Facebook
