SNR requirements for both ePMP and 450 (at decent modulation) are higher than they are for FSK. I think this may be the problem that you will run into.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not in our experience...we have not had great success migrating from FSK > 100 series to ePMP. Noise floor SNR sucks. > > Have you tried migrating from 2.4 FSK too 2.4 450 at a very noisy > site? Have a site I need more capacity at and frequency options are > limited. > > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> We're on a tower with a basically dead WISP that has 3 sectors of > 2.4ghz up there. It's 10 year old equipment so not even sure what brand. > Anyway, we placed 4 sectors of Ubiquiti 2.4 gear on 10 MHz channels with RF > Armor on all sectors. We found that channels 1 and 11 were best so we did > channel 1 on North and south sector and channel 11 on east and west so > they're back to back. The back to back sectors are separated by a solid > water tank/tower but they still see each other at -55 which is hotter than > I thought they would be with Armor and the water tank. > >> > >> Anyway, we don't get the best of performance due to self interference > as well as interference from the old WISP equipment. In your experience > with ePMP, would we see a noticeable improvement going to ePMP 2.4 gear and > syncing it all for channel reuse on the back to back sectors? Would this > also give us the added benefit that we would reduce adjacent channel > interference with ourselves because all sectors would transmit and receive > with each other? > >> > >> Thank you >
