He has Ubnt up there, not Canopy FSK.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: > Not in our experience...we have not had great success migrating from FSK > 100 series to ePMP. Noise floor SNR sucks. > > Regards, > Chuck > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> We're on a tower with a basically dead WISP that has 3 sectors of 2.4ghz >> up there. It's 10 year old equipment so not even sure what brand. Anyway, >> we placed 4 sectors of Ubiquiti 2.4 gear on 10 MHz channels with RF Armor >> on all sectors. We found that channels 1 and 11 were best so we did channel >> 1 on North and south sector and channel 11 on east and west so they're back >> to back. The back to back sectors are separated by a solid water tank/tower >> but they still see each other at -55 which is hotter than I thought they >> would be with Armor and the water tank. >> >> Anyway, we don't get the best of performance due to self interference as >> well as interference from the old WISP equipment. In your experience with >> ePMP, would we see a noticeable improvement going to ePMP 2.4 gear and >> syncing it all for channel reuse on the back to back sectors? Would this >> also give us the added benefit that we would reduce adjacent channel >> interference with ourselves because all sectors would transmit and receive >> with each other? >> >> Thank you >> >> -- >> Darin Steffl >> Minnesota WiFi >> www.mnwifi.com >> 507-634-WiFi >> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook >> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >> > >
