I haven't done anything with ePMP in 2.4ghz yet, but I can't imagine it's going to be any worse than ubnt... sync will at least fix your self-interference.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > He has Ubnt up there, not Canopy FSK. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not in our experience...we have not had great success migrating from FSK >> 100 series to ePMP. Noise floor SNR sucks. >> >> Regards, >> Chuck >> >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> We're on a tower with a basically dead WISP that has 3 sectors of 2.4ghz >>> up there. It's 10 year old equipment so not even sure what brand. Anyway, >>> we placed 4 sectors of Ubiquiti 2.4 gear on 10 MHz channels with RF Armor >>> on all sectors. We found that channels 1 and 11 were best so we did channel >>> 1 on North and south sector and channel 11 on east and west so they're back >>> to back. The back to back sectors are separated by a solid water tank/tower >>> but they still see each other at -55 which is hotter than I thought they >>> would be with Armor and the water tank. >>> >>> Anyway, we don't get the best of performance due to self interference as >>> well as interference from the old WISP equipment. In your experience with >>> ePMP, would we see a noticeable improvement going to ePMP 2.4 gear and >>> syncing it all for channel reuse on the back to back sectors? Would this >>> also give us the added benefit that we would reduce adjacent channel >>> interference with ourselves because all sectors would transmit and receive >>> with each other? >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> -- >>> Darin Steffl >>> Minnesota WiFi >>> www.mnwifi.com >>> 507-634-WiFi >>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook >>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >>> >> >> >
